IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v55y2024i4p677-689.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing United States cattle producers use of livestock risk protection

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher N. Boyer
  • Karen L. DeLong
  • Andrew P. Griffith
  • Charles C. Martinez

Abstract

United States cattle producers have various government‐sponsored programs to protect against weather and disease related risks, but livestock risk protection (LRP) insurance is the only program that protects against price risk. However, adoption of LRP insurance is low even though cattle price declines are the primary cause of economic loss, and LRP premium subsidies have recently been increased. Therefore, the objective of this study is to explore how informational nudges about receiving an indemnity payment, LRP contract characteristics, and individual risk preferences affect the use of LRP. Producer survey results were estimated using a Cragg model to determine the factors affecting producers’ likelihood of purchasing LRP and the number of head they would insure. Producers were more likely to purchase 100% LRP coverage and would also insure more head at 100% coverage when compared to lower coverage levels. We found providing information on the probability of receiving an indemnity did not impact LRP purchasing decisions. However, counter to expectations, producers were more likely to buy LRP when the randomly provided cattle prices in the survey were successively increasing each month, and if participants considered themselves more willing to take risks in their cattle operation. Results provide insights into behavioral factors affecting LRP participation which could help inform future insurance policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher N. Boyer & Karen L. DeLong & Andrew P. Griffith & Charles C. Martinez, 2024. "Factors influencing United States cattle producers use of livestock risk protection," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(4), pages 677-689, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:55:y:2024:i:4:p:677-689
    DOI: 10.1111/agec.12838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12838
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/agec.12838?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boyer, Christopher N. & Lambert, Dayton M. & Griffith, Andrew P. & Clark, Christopher D., 2022. "Factors Influencing Use and Frequency of Rotational Grazing for Beef Cattle in Tennessee," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(2), pages 394-406, May.
    2. Chad E. Hart & Bruce A. Babcock & Dermot J. Hayes, 2001. "Livestock Revenue Insurance," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(6), pages 553-580, June.
    3. Ruiqing Miao & Madhu Khanna & Haixiao Huang, 2016. "Responsiveness of Crop Yield and Acreage to Prices and Climate," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(1), pages 191-211.
    4. Thomas Dohmen & Armin Falk & David Huffman & Uwe Sunde & Jürgen Schupp & Gert G. Wagner, 2011. "Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants, And Behavioral Consequences," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 9(3), pages 522-550, June.
    5. Belasco, Eric J. & Taylor, Mykel R. & Goodwin, Barry K. & Schroeder, Ted C., 2009. "Probabilistic Models of Yield, Price, and Revenue Risks for Fed Cattle Production," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(1), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Cragg, John G, 1971. "Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 39(5), pages 829-844, September.
    7. McKENDREE, MELISSA G.S. & TONSOR, GLYNN T. & WOLF, CHRISTOPHER A., 2018. "Animal Welfare Perceptions Of The U.S. Public And Cow-Calf Producers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(4), pages 544-578, November.
    8. repec:ags:aaea22:335429 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Glynn Tonsor & Ted Schroeder, 2011. "Multivariate forecasting of a commodity portfolio: application to cattle feeding margins and risk," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(11), pages 1329-1339.
    10. McKendree, Melissa G.S. & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Schulz, Lee L., 2021. "Management of Multiple Sources of Risk in Livestock Production," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 75-93, February.
    11. Christopher N. Boyer & Eunchun Park & Karen L. DeLong & Andrew Griffith & Charles Martinez, 2023. "Feeder and fed cattle purchases of livestock risk protection," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 83(4/5), pages 720-733, September.
    12. Nathan P. Hendricks & Aaron Smith & Daniel A. Sumner, 2014. "Crop Supply Dynamics and the Illusion of Partial Adjustment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1469-1491.
    13. Fields, Deacue & Gillespie, Jeffrey, 2008. "Beef Producer Preferences and Purchase Decisions for Livestock Price Insurance," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(3), pages 789-803, December.
    14. Luisa Menapace & Gregory Colson & Roberta Raffaelli, 2016. "A comparison of hypothetical risk attitude elicitation instruments for explaining farmer crop insurance purchases," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(1), pages 113-135.
    15. Lambert, Dayton M. & Clark, Christopher D. & Medwid, Laura J. & Hawkins, Shawn A. & McClellan, Hannah A., 2020. "Best pasture management practice adoption and sediment abatement," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 204-221, May.
    16. Boyer, Christopher N. & Griffith, Andrew P., 2023. "Subsidy Rate Changes on Livestock Risk Protection for Feeder Cattle," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(1), January.
    17. Daniel Hellerstein & Nathaniel Higgins & John Horowitz, 2013. "The predictive power of risk preference measures for farming decisions -super-†," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 40(5), pages 807-833, December.
    18. Merritt, Meagan G. & Griffith, Andrew P. & Boyer, Christopher N. & Lewis, Karen E., 2017. "Probability Of Receiving An Indemnity Payment From Feeder Cattle Livestock Risk Protection Insurance," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(3), pages 363-381, August.
    19. Jisang Yu & Aaron Smith & Daniel A Sumner, 2018. "Effects of Crop Insurance Premium Subsidies on Crop Acreage," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 100(1), pages 91-114.
    20. Burdine, Kenneth H. & Halich, Greg, 2014. "Payout Analysis of Livestock Risk Protection Insurance for Feeder Cattle," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2014, pages 1-14.
    21. Jeffrey Gillespie & Seon‐Ae Kim & Krishna Paudel, 2007. "Why don't producers adopt best management practices? An analysis of the beef cattle industry," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 36(1), pages 89-102, January.
    22. Collin Weigel & Laura A. Paul & Paul J. Ferraro & Kent D. Messer, 2021. "Challenges in Recruiting U.S. Farmers for Policy‐Relevant Economic Field Experiments," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 556-572, June.
    23. David C. Hall & Thomas O. Knight & Keith H. Coble & Alan E. Baquet & George F. Patrick, 2003. "Analysis of Beef Producers' Risk Management Perceptions and Desire for Further Risk Management Education," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 430-448.
    24. Johansson, Robert & Effland, Anne & Coble, Keith, 2017. "Falling Response Rates to USDA Crop Surveys: Why It Matters," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 7, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:ags:aaea22:335429 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Boyer, Christopher N. & DeLong, Karen L. & Griffith, Andrew P. & Martinez, Charles, 2024. "Examining how Risk Preferences and Information Affect Livestock Risk Protection Use," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343568, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Griffith, Andrew P. & Boyer, Christopher N. & Kane, Ian, 2022. "Literature Review: Price Risk Management Contributions to Economic Sustainability in the Cattle Industry," Extension Reports 322767, University of Tennessee, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Boyer, Christopher N. & Griffith, Andrew P., 2023. "Subsidy Rate Changes on Livestock Risk Protection for Feeder Cattle," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(1), January.
    5. McKendree, Melissa G.S. & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Schulz, Lee L., 2021. "Management of Multiple Sources of Risk in Livestock Production," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(1), pages 75-93, February.
    6. Cui, Xiaomeng, 2020. "Climate change and adaptation in agriculture: Evidence from US cropping patterns," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Rosch, Stephanie D., 2017. "Risk Attitudes of US Agricultural Producers," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258025, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Filiptseva, Anna & Filler, Günther & Odening, Martin, 2023. "Compensation schemes for plant quarantine pest costs: A case study for Germany," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1381-1395.
    9. Fabio G., Santeramo & Ilaria, Russo & Emilia, Lamonaca, 2022. "Italian subsidised crop insurance: what the role of policy changes," MPRA Paper 115299, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Rommel, Jens & Hermann, Daniel & Müller, Malte & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2016. "Comparing The Predictive Power Of Risk Elicitation Instruments: Experimental Evidence From German Farmers," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244759, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    11. Ruishi Si & Xueqian Zhang & Yumeng Yao & Qian Lu, 2022. "Risk Preference, Health Risk Perception, and Environmental Exposure Nexus: Evidence from Rural Women as Pig Breeders, China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 151-178, July.
    12. Robert Finger & David Wüpper & Chloe McCallum, 2023. "The (in)stability of farmer risk preferences," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 155-167, February.
    13. McKendree, Melissa G.S. & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Schulz, Lee, 2017. "Feedlot operators’ decision making regarding price and animal health risk," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258462, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Filiptseva, Anna & Filler, Günther & Odening, Martin, 2022. "Compensation Options for Quarantine Costs in Plant Production," 62nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 7-9, 2022 329595, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    15. Vigani, Mauro & Khafagy, Amr & Berry, Robert, 2024. "Public spending for agricultural risk management: Land use, regional welfare and intra-subsidy substitution," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    16. Sophie Massin & Antoine Nebout & Bruno Ventelou, 2018. "Predicting medical practices using various risk attitude measures," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(6), pages 843-860, July.
    17. Catia Batista & Janis Umblijs, 2016. "Do migrants send remittances as a way of self-insurance?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 68(1), pages 108-130.
    18. CARPENTIER, Alain & GOHIN, Alexandre & SCKOKAI, Paolo & THOMAS, Alban, 2015. "Economic modelling of agricultural production: past advances and new challenges," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(1), March.
    19. Alper Demirdogen & Emine Olhan & Mehmet Hasdemir, 2022. "Heterogeneous impact of agricultural support policies: evidence from Turkey," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 12203-12225, October.
    20. Caroline Roussy & Aude Ridier & Karim Chaïb, 2014. "Adoption d’innovations par les agriculteurs : rôle des perceptions et des préférences," Post-Print hal-01123427, HAL.
    21. Loughrey, J. & Thorne, F. & Kinsella, A. & Hennessy, T. & O'Donoghue, C. & Vollenweider, X., 2015. "Market risk management and the demand for forward contracts among Irish dairy farmers," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 4(4), July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:55:y:2024:i:4:p:677-689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.