IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v9y2025issue-4p157-171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Controlling Shareholders and Auditor-Client Relationships in Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Siti Hajar Asmah Ali

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, the National University of Malaysia)

  • Mohd Mohid Rahmat

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, the National University of Malaysia)

  • Maizatulakma Abdullah

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, the National University of Malaysia)

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between controlling shareholders (CS), auditor-client relationships (ACRs), and related party transactions (RPTs) in Malaysia, a country characterized by concentrated ownership structures and family-controlled firms. The research aims to explore how specific levels of CS ownership (23% and 33%) influence RPT practices and disclosures, and to examine the moderating role of long-term ACRs in mitigating or exacerbating RPT risks. This study employs a pooled regression analysis using a sample of 580 companies listed on Bursa Malaysia from 2014 to 2017. Data were collected from annual reports and Datastream. The study also incorporates Social Network Theory to understand the dynamics of embedded relationships between auditors and clients. The findings reveal that CS with ownership levels of 23% and 33% are positively associated with RPTs, indicating that CS use their dominant positions to engage in RPTs for personal benefit. However, CS with higher ownership (33%) exhibit more cautious behavior, suggesting a nuanced relationship between ownership levels and RPTs. Long-term ACRs improve auditors’ ability to detect and disclose RPTs, but they also mitigate the positive relationship between CS and RPTs, indicating that close ACRs may restrict CS’s ability to exploit RPTs. Despite the use of data from 2014 to 2017, the findings remain highly relevant as Malaysia’s ownership structures and governance mechanisms have not undergone significant changes in recent years. The insights provided by this study continue to reflect the current state of RPT practices and their implications in Malaysia. The findings have important implications for policymakers and regulators. This paper suggests the need for stricter oversight of RPT disclosures, particularly in firms with concentrated ownership structures. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of maintaining auditor independence and skepticism in long-term ACRs to ensure transparency and fairness in RPT disclosures.

Suggested Citation

  • Siti Hajar Asmah Ali & Mohd Mohid Rahmat & Maizatulakma Abdullah, 2025. "The Role of Controlling Shareholders and Auditor-Client Relationships in Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Malaysia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(4), pages 157-171, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:p:157-171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-9-issue-4/157-171.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/the-role-of-controlling-shareholders-and-auditor-client-relationships-in-related-party-transactions-evidence-from-malaysia/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paligorova, Teodora & Xu, Zhaoxia, 2012. "Complex ownership and capital structure," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 701-716.
    2. Stijn Claessens & Simeon Djankov & Joseph P. H. Fan & Larry H. P. Lang, 2002. "Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(6), pages 2741-2771, December.
    3. AKM Waresul Karim & Tony van Zijl, 2013. "Efficiency and opportunism in auditor quality choice in emerging audit services markets," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 241-256, July.
    4. AKM Waresul Karim & Tony van Zijl, 2013. "Efficiency and opportunism in auditor quality choice in emerging audit services markets," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 241-256, July.
    5. Saibal Ghosh, 2011. "Firm ownership type, earnings management and auditor relationships: evidence from India," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 26(4), pages 350-369, April.
    6. repec:eme:maj000:maj-05-2018-1896 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Bertrand, Marianne & Johnson, Simon & Samphantharak, Krislert & Schoar, Antoinette, 2008. "Mixing family with business: A study of Thai business groups and the families behind them," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 466-498, June.
    8. Anita Abigail & Christiana Dharmastuti, 2022. "The impact of related party transactions on firm value in Indonesia: moderating role of good corporate governance," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 2135208-213, December.
    9. Habib, Ahsan & Muhammadi, Abdul Haris & Jiang, Haiyan, 2017. "Political Connections and Related Party Transactions: Evidence from Indonesia," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 45-63.
    10. Krista Fiolleau & Kris Hoang & Karim Jamal & Shyam Sunder, 2013. "How Do Regulatory Reforms to Enhance Auditor Independence Work in Practice?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 864-890, September.
    11. Rana Ahmad Baker & Ali Al‐Thuneibat, 2011. "Audit tenure and the equity risk premium: evidence from Jordan," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 5-23, March.
    12. Azizkhani, Masoud & Daghani, Reza & Shailer, Greg, 2018. "Audit Firm Tenure and Audit Quality in a Constrained Market," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 167-182.
    13. González-Díaz, Belén & García-Fernández, Roberto & López-Díaz, Antonio, 2015. "Auditor tenure and audit quality in Spanish state-owned foundations," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 115-126.
    14. Mark Kohlbeck & Brian W. Mayhew, 2017. "Are Related Party Transactions Red Flags?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 900-928, June.
    15. Liew Chee Yoong & Ervina Alfan & S.Susela Devi, 2015. "Family Firms, Expropriation and Firm Value: Evidence from Related Party Transactions in Malaysia," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 49(5), pages 139-152, Special I.
    16. Wang, Hong-Da & Cho, Chia-Ching & Lin, Chan-Jane, 2019. "Related party transactions, business relatedness, and firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 411-425.
    17. Brandon Ater & Christine Gimbar & J. Gregory Jenkins & Gabriel Saucedo & Nicole S. Wright, 2019. "Audit roles and the review process: workpaper preparers’ and reviewers’ differing perspectives," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(4), pages 438-461, May.
    18. Nemiraja Jadiyappa & L. Emily Hickman & Ram Kumar Kakani & Qambar Abidi, 2021. "Auditor tenure and audit quality: an investigation of moderating factors prior to the commencement of mandatory rotations in India," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(5), pages 724-743, August.
    19. Kee‐Hong Bae & Jun‐Koo Kang & Jin‐Mo Kim, 2002. "Tunneling or Value Added? Evidence from Mergers by Korean Business Groups," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(6), pages 2695-2740, December.
    20. Hwang, Sunwoo & Kim, Woochan, 2016. "When heirs become major shareholders: Evidence on pyramiding financed by related-party sales," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 23-42.
    21. Hoang, Ha & Antoncic, Bostjan, 2003. "Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 165-187, March.
    22. Aharony, Joseph & Wang, Jiwei & Yuan, Hongqi, 2010. "Tunneling as an incentive for earnings management during the IPO process in China," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-26, January.
    23. Dody Hapsoro & Tiara Rani Santoso, 2018. "Does Audit Quality Mediate the Effect of Auditor Tenure, Abnormal Audit Fee and Auditor's Reputation on Giving Going Concern Opinion?," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(1), pages 143-152.
    24. Friedman, Eric & Johnson, Simon & Mitton, Todd, 2003. "Propping and tunneling," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 732-750, December.
    25. Sa’adiah Munir & Norman Mohd Saleh & Romlah Jaffar & Puan Yatim, 2013. "Family Ownership, Related-Party Transactions and Earnings Quality," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 9(1), pages 129-153.
    26. Rana Ahmad Baker & Ali Al‐Thuneibat, 2011. "Audit tenure and the equity risk premium: evidence from Jordan," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(1), pages 5-23, March.
    27. Saibal Ghosh, 2011. "Firm ownership type, earnings management and auditor relationships: evidence from India," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(4), pages 350-369, April.
    28. McCracken, Susan & Salterio, Steven E. & Gibbins, Michael, 2008. "Auditor-client management relationships and roles in negotiating financial reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(4-5), pages 362-383.
    29. Morck, Randall & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W., 1988. "Management ownership and market valuation : An empirical analysis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 293-315, January.
    30. Lucie Courteau & Roberto Di Pietra & Paolo Giudici & Andrea Melis, 2017. "The role and effect of controlling shareholders in corporate governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(3), pages 561-572, September.
    31. Ball, Fiona & Tyler, Jonathan & Wells, Peter, 2015. "Is audit quality impacted by auditor relationships?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 166-181.
    32. Morck, Randall & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W., 1988. "Management ownership and market valuation," Scholarly Articles 29407535, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    33. repec:eme:maj000:maj-12-2020-2957 is not listed on IDEAS
    34. Aghazadeh, Sanaz & Hoang, Kris, 2020. "How does audit firm emphasis on client relationship quality influence auditors’ inferences about and responses to potential persuasion in client communications?," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    35. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    36. Kohlbeck, Mark & Mayhew, Brian W., 2010. "Valuation of firms that disclose related party transactions," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 115-137, March.
    37. Garcia-Blandon, Josep & Argiles, Josep Ma, 2015. "Audit firm tenure and independence: A comprehensive investigation of audit qualifications in Spain," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 82-93.
    38. William F., Messier & Robertson, Jesse C. & Simon, Chad A., 2015. "The effects of client management concessions and ingratiation attempts on auditors' trust and proposed adjustments," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 80-90.
    39. repec:eme:maj000:02686901111124666 is not listed on IDEAS
    40. Habib, Ahsan & Muhammadi, Abdul Haris & Jiang, Haiyan, 2017. "Political connections, related party transactions, and auditor choice: Evidence from Indonesia," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bansal, Shashank & Singh, Harminder, 2023. "Does market competition foster related party transactions? Evidence from emerging market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Mohd Mohid Rahmat & Kamran Ahmed & Gerald J. Lobo, 2020. "Related Party Transactions, Value Relevance and Informativeness of Earnings: Evidence from Four Economies in East Asia," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 1-42, March.
    3. Sumon Kumar Bhaumik & Andros Gregoriou, 2010. "‘Family’ Ownership, Tunnelling And Earnings Management: A Review Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(4), pages 705-730, September.
    4. Kang, Hyung Cheol & Anderson, Robert M. & Eom, Kyong Shik & Kang, Sang Koo, 2017. "Controlling shareholders' value, long-run firm value and short-term performance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 340-353.
    5. Khosa,Amrinder & Ahmed,Kamran & Henry,Darren, 2019. "Ownership Structure, Related Party Transactions, and Firm Valuation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108492195, Enero-Abr.
    6. Kang, Minjung & Lee, Ho-Young & Lee, Myung-Gun & Park, Jong Chool, 2014. "The association between related-party transactions and control–ownership wedge: Evidence from Korea," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 272-296.
    7. Kinshuk Saurabh, 2023. "Expropriation mechanisms, corporate governance, and cross-border acquisitions by Indian firms," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 395-409, December.
    8. Randall Morck, 2011. "Finance and Governance in Developing Economies," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 375-406, December.
    9. Bernard Yeung & Randall Morck & Daniel Wolfenzon, 2004. "Corporate Governance, Economic Entrenchment and Growth," Working Papers 04-21, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    10. Randall Morck, 2009. "The Riddle of the Great Pyramids," NBER Working Papers 14858, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Weidong Zhang & Jenny Jing Wang & Guomin Luo & Yanqi Sun, 2021. "Tunnelling in asset‐injecting private placements: evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5501-5522, December.
    12. Agnihotri, Arpita & Bhattacharya, Saurabh, 2019. "Internationalization, related party transactions, and firm ownership structure: Empirical evidence from an emerging market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 340-352.
    13. Connelly, J. Thomas & Limpaphayom, Piman & Nagarajan, Nandu J., 2012. "Form versus substance: The effect of ownership structure and corporate governance on firm value in Thailand," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1722-1743.
    14. Yen, Tze-Yu & Andre, Paul, 2007. "Ownership structure and operating performance of acquiring firms: The case of English-origin countries," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 59(5), pages 380-405.
    15. Sviatoslav Moskalev & Seung Park, 2010. "South Korean Chaebols and Value-Based Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 49-62, March.
    16. Tong, Wilson H.S. & Yu, Wayne W., 2012. "A corporate governance explanation of the A-B share discount in China," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 125-147.
    17. Jean Jinghan Chen & Peng Cheng & Xinrong Xiao, 2011. "Related party transactions as a source of earnings management," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 165-181.
    18. Yung, Kenneth & Jian, Yi, 2017. "Effects of the shareholder base on firm behavior and firm value in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 370-385.
    19. Randall Morck & Lloyd Steier, 2005. "The Global History of Corporate Governance: An Introduction," NBER Chapters, in: A History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers, pages 1-64, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Chauhan, Yogesh & Dey, Dipanjan Kumar & Jha, Rajneesh Ranjan, 2016. "Board structure, controlling ownership, and business groups: Evidence from India," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 63-83.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:issue-4:p:157-171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.