IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aiy/jnjaer/v24y2025i2p584-621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clustering of Russian Manufacturing Companies by Indicators of Their Financial Condition Using Machine Learning Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Lev A. Bulanov
  • Alexei V. Kalina
  • Vadim V. Krivorotov

Abstract

Clustering of research objects and combining them into similar groups based on a set of characteristics is an important stage in solving many tasks of socio-economic development, especially tasks related to assessing the state of the socio-economic system, as well as modeling and forecasting indicators of its future development. The purpose of this study is a relative assessment of the financial condition of large Russian manufacturing companies based on data from accounting reporting forms using clusterization methods classified as machine learning without a teacher. The results of such an assessment are subsequently supposed to be used to build a model for assessing the financial condition of companies based on one of the machine learning algorithms with a teacher. The paper offers key indicators of the financial condition of companies, on the basis of which it is proposed to perform their clusterization. They were identified as a result of the analysis of modern methods and approaches to research and assessment of competitiveness and competitive position of companies. When conducting clusterization based on the proposed set of indicators, financial reporting data from 2,249 Russian manufacturing companies based on the results of 2023 were used. Companies with a turnover of more than 2 billion rubles and a staff of more than 251 people were considered as large companies.. K-Means++, hierarchical clustering, and DBSCAN were used as clustering algorithms. In order to obtain the best result, special data preprocessing and selection of the necessary hyperparameters for clustering algorithms were carried out. The quality of the final clustering was assessed using the Davies-Bouldin (DBI) and the Calinski–Harabasz (CHI) scores. The results showed that the production companies under consideration can be combined into a relatively small number of clusters (usually no more than 3) in terms of financial condition, which opens up wide opportunities for building models of the financial condition of companies. Based on the results of using 3 clustering methods, K-Means++ turned out to be the best algorithm by a small margin, the formed centroids of which can be called the average assessment of companies with poor, normal and good financial condition. The quality of the final clustering can be assessed as good.

Suggested Citation

  • Lev A. Bulanov & Alexei V. Kalina & Vadim V. Krivorotov, 2025. "Clustering of Russian Manufacturing Companies by Indicators of Their Financial Condition Using Machine Learning Technologies," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 24(2), pages 584-621.
  • Handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:24:y:2025:i:2:p:584-621
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.2.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalaer.ru//fileadmin/user_upload/site_15934/2025/08_Bulanov_Kalina_Krivorotov.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.2.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Su-Ah & Park, Sohyun & Kwak, Minjung & Kang, Changmuk, 2025. "Examining product quality and competitiveness via online reviews: An integrated approach of importance performance competitor analysis and Kano model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Tao, Xu & Cai, Wanlin, 2025. "The impact of digital finance on export competitiveness: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. David Good & M. Nadiri & Lars-Hendrik Röller & Robin Sickles, 1993. "Efficiency and productivity growth comparisons of European and U.S. Air carriers: A first look at the data," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 115-125, June.
    4. Bilal Lotfi & Mohamed Karim, 2016. "Competitiveness Determinants of Moroccan Exports: Quantity-Based Analysis," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(7), pages 140-140, July.
    5. Akvile Cibinskiene & Daiva Dumciuviene & Viktorija Bobinaite & Egidijus Dragašius, 2021. "Competitiveness of Industrial Companies Forming the Value Chain of Wind Energy Components: The Case of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Liu, Yu-li & Tian, Li & Li, Changyan & Wu, Yanfei, 2024. "Analyzing the competitiveness and strategies of Chinese mobile network operators in the 5G era," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).
    7. Riyahi, Milad & Martín, Alvaro Gutiérrez, 2025. "Optimizing capacity expansion modeling with a novel hierarchical clustering and systematic elbow method: A case study on power and storage units in Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    8. John E. Prescott & John H. Grant, 1988. "A Manager's Guide for Evaluating Competitive Analysis Techniques," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 10-22, June.
    9. Li, Yanlai & Yu, Huiru & Shen, Zifan, 2025. "Dynamic prediction of product competitive position: A multisource data-driven competitive analysis framework from a multi-competitor perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Parkan, Celik & Wu, Ming-Lu, 1999. "Measurement of the performance of an investment bank using the operational competitiveness rating procedure," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 201-217, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vadim V. Krivorotov & Alexei V. Kalina & S.E. Erypalov, 2022. "Modern Assessment and Forecast Prospects of the Competitiveness of the World's Largest Manufacturers of Copper Products," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 21(4), pages 734-774.
    2. Chang, Yu-Hern & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2001. "Evaluating airline competitiveness using multiattribute decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 405-415, October.
    3. Fethi, Meryem Duygun & Pasiouras, Fotios, 2010. "Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(2), pages 189-198, July.
    4. Damien J. Neven & Lars-Hendrik Röller & Zhentang Zhang, 1997. "Union Power and Product Market Competition: Evidence from the Airline Industry," CIG Working Papers FS IV 97-38, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG).
    5. William R. Pratt & Gustavo A. Barboza & Matthew Brigida, 2023. "Leverage and firm value," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 52(2), July.
    6. Kozo Kiyota & Miho Takizawa, 2006. "The Shadow of Death: Pre-exit Performance of Firms in Japan," Discussion papers 06033, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    7. Jiang, Nan & Sharp, Basil, 2014. "Cost Efficiency of Dairy Farming in New Zealand: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 406-418, December.
    8. Oum, Tae Hoon & Yu, Chunyan, 1995. "A productivity comparison of the world's major airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 181-195.
    9. Jayanthi, Shekhar & Kocha, Bart & Sinha, Kingshuk K., 1996. "Competitive Analysis Of U.S. Food Processing Plants," Working Papers 14333, University of Minnesota, The Food Industry Center.
    10. Albana Berisha Qehaja & Enver Kutllovci & Justina Shiroka Pula, 2017. "Strategic Management Tools and Techniques Usage: a Qualitative Review," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 585-600.
    11. Oum, Tae Hoon & Zhang, Anming & Zhang, Yimin, 2000. "Optimal demand for operating lease of aircraft," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 17-29, January.
    12. Parkan, Celik, 2007. "Verifying OCRA's economic sense: Response to Agrell and West (2001)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 274-278, May.
    13. A. Georges Assaf & Frank W. Agbola, 2011. "Modelling the Performance of Australian Hotels: A DEA Double Bootstrap Approach," Tourism Economics, , vol. 17(1), pages 73-89, February.
    14. Ender Coskun & Abdulvahap Ozcan, 2016. "Finansal Sikinti Surecinde Sirketlerin Etkinlik Duzeylerinin Belirlenmesi," EconWorld Working Papers 16001, WERI-World Economic Research Institute, revised Apr 2016.
    15. Wei-Kang Wang & Wen-Min Lu & Yu-Han Wang, 2013. "The relationship between bank performance and intellectual capital in East Asia," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 1041-1062, February.
    16. Ahmad, Munir & Boris E., Bravo-Ureta, 1996. "Technical efficiency measures for dairy farms using panel data: a comparison of alternative model specifications," MPRA Paper 37703, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Barros, Carlos Pestana & Wanke, Peter, 2015. "An analysis of African airlines efficiency with two-stage TOPSIS and neural networks," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 44, pages 90-102.
    18. Tim Coelli & Sergio Perelman & Elliot Romano, 1999. "Accounting for Environmental Influences in Stochastic Frontier Models: With Application to International Airlines," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 251-273, June.
    19. Park, B. U. & Sickles, R. C. & Simar, L., 1998. "Stochastic panel frontiers: A semiparametric approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 84(2), pages 273-301, June.
    20. Anna Afonina & Vladimír Chalupský, 2013. "Investigation of strategic management tools and techniques," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 61(4), pages 833-840.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • C45 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Neural Networks and Related Topics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiy:jnjaer:v:24:y:2025:i:2:p:584-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Natalia Starodubets (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seurfru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.