IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aio/manmar/vxivy2016i2p299-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect Of Sales Promotion Schemes On Purchase Quantity: A Study Of Malaysian Consumers

Author

Listed:
  • Hawa JALLOW

    (Anglia Ruskin University United Kingdom)

  • Omkar DASTANE

    (School of Accounting & Business Management, FTMS Global Malaysia)

Abstract

The research aims to study the effect of sales promotion on the purchase quantity and recommend sales promotional means and methods that could improve sales for retail sector in Malaysia. The impact of coupons, bonus packages, premiums, free samples and price discount is measured on purchase quantity of Malaysian retail consumers. Empirical data is gathered from 150 respondents using self-administered questionnaire and analyzed using correlation and regression analysis to examine the relationship between variables. The findings of the study reveal that all independent variables influences purchase quantity positively and significantly while free samples and price discounts are most influential factors for Malaysian market.

Suggested Citation

  • Hawa JALLOW & Omkar DASTANE, 2016. "Effect Of Sales Promotion Schemes On Purchase Quantity: A Study Of Malaysian Consumers," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(2), pages 299-320, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:aio:manmar:v:xiv:y:2016:i:2:p:299-320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://mnmk.ro/documents/2016_02/12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Powell, Lisa M., 2009. "Fast food costs and adolescent body mass index: Evidence from panel data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 963-970, September.
    2. Mayhew, Glenn E & Winer, Russell S, 1992. "An Empirical Analysis of Internal and External Reference Prices Using Scanner Data," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(1), pages 62-70, June.
    3. Shimp, Terence A & Kavas, Alican, 1984. "The Theory of Reasoned Action Applied to Coupon Usage," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(3), pages 795-809, December.
    4. Adriana Samper & Janet A. Schwartz, 2013. "Price Inferences for Sacred versus Secular Goods: Changing the Price of Medicine Influences Perceived Health Risk," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(6), pages 1343-1358.
    5. Sigué, Simon Pierre, 2008. "Consumer and Retailer Promotions: Who is Better Off?," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(4), pages 449-460.
    6. Jonq-Ying Lee & Mark G. Brown, 1985. "Coupon Redemption and the Demand for Frozen Concentrated Orange Juice: A Switching Regression Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(3), pages 647-653.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andy Chin Woon Fook & Omkar Dastane, 2021. "Effectiveness of Loyalty Programs in Customer Retention: A Multiple Mediation Analysis," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 10(1), pages 7-32, June.
    2. R. Agus Trihatmoko, 2019. "Intensity of Sales Turnover and Promotional Expenditure and the Likelihood of New Product Success: Configurational Matrix of Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG)," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 320-328, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Priya Jha-Dang, 2006. "A Review of Psychological Research on Consumer Promotions and a New Perspective Based on Mental Accounting," Vision, , vol. 10(3), pages 35-43, July.
    2. Dang Jha Priya, 2004. "A Review of Theoretical Perspectives Applied to Sales Promotion and a New Perspective based on Mental Accounting Theory," IIMA Working Papers WP2004-03-04, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    3. Alam Kazmi, Syed Hasnain, 2015. "Developments in Promotion Strategies Review on Psychological Streams of Consumers," MPRA Paper 65424, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 May 2015.
    4. Raghubir, Priya, 2006. "An information processing review of the subjective value of money and prices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(10-11), pages 1053-1062, October.
    5. Larson, Ronald B., 1994. "DISCOUNT COUPONS: Beyond the Price Discount Effect," Promotion in the Marketing Mix: What Works, Where and Why, April 28-29, 1994, Toronto, Canada 279592, Regional Research Projects > NECC-63: Research Committee on Commodity Promotion.
    6. Sasmita Palo & Linu Charles, 2015. "Investigating Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing Intention of Salespeople," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 40(3-4), pages 302-324, August.
    7. Amy Wenxuan Ding & Shibo Li & Patrali Chatterjee, 2015. "Learning User Real-Time Intent for Optimal Dynamic Web Page Transformation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 339-359, June.
    8. Yuval Arbel & Danny Ben-Shahar & Stuart Gabriel, 2016. "Are The Disabled Less Loss Averse? Evidence From A Natural Policy Experiment," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(2), pages 1291-1318, April.
    9. Papatla, Purushottam, 1995. "A dynamic model of the advertising-price sensitivity relationship for heterogeneous consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 261-271, July.
    10. Lisa M. Powell & Frank J. Chaloupka, 2011. "Economic Contextual Factors and Child Body Mass Index," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Aspects of Obesity, pages 127-144, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Shun Yin Lam & Mark Vandenbosch & John Hulland & Michael Pearce, 2001. "Evaluating Promotions in Shopping Environments: Decomposing Sales Response into Attraction, Conversion, and Spending Effects," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 194-215, March.
    12. Noor Afzainiza Afendi & Farah Lina Azizan & Aflah Isa Darami, 2014. "Determinants of Halal Purchase Intention: Case in Perlis," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 4(5), pages 118-123, May.
    13. Popkowski Leszczyc, Peter T.L. & Qiu, Chun & He, Yongfu, 2009. "Empirical Testing of the Reference-Price Effect of Buy-Now Prices in Internet Auctions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 211-221.
    14. Fischer, Greg & Karlan, Dean & McConnell, Margaret & Raffler, Pia, 2019. "Short-term subsidies and seller type: A health products experiment in Uganda," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 110-124.
    15. Guangchao Charles Feng, 2017. "The dynamics of the Chinese film industry: factors affecting Chinese audiences’ intentions to see movies," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 658-676, October.
    16. Novak, Jiri & Bilinski, Pawel, 2018. "Social stigma and executive compensation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 169-184.
    17. Biondi, Beatrice & Cornelsen, Laura & Mazzocchi, Mario & Smith, Richard, 2020. "Between preferences and references: Asymmetric price elasticities and the simulation of fiscal policies," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 108-128.
    18. Ahrens, Steffen & Pirschel, Inske & Snower, Dennis J., 2017. "A theory of price adjustment under loss aversion," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 78-95.
    19. Puccinelli, Nancy M. & Goodstein, Ronald C. & Grewal, Dhruv & Price, Robert & Raghubir, Priya & Stewart, David, 2009. "Customer Experience Management in Retailing: Understanding the Buying Process," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 15-30.
    20. Davis, Robert & Lang, Bodo, 2012. "Modeling the effect of self-efficacy on game usage and purchase behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 67-77.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sales promotion; Purchase quantity; Malaysian Consumers; Retail;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M30 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - General
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aio:manmar:v:xiv:y:2016:i:2:p:299-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin Barbu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.