IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/phajad/358993.html

Factors Influencing the Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Cacao Farmers in Davao de Oro, Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Placencia, Shemaiah Gail P.
  • Carbonell, Alessa Keith E.
  • Digal, Larry N.
  • Balgos, Carol Q.

Abstract

With its ideal agro-climatic conditions in the “cacao belt,” the Philippines has high productivity potential for cacao. However, the country struggles to meet rising domestic and international demands with its low productivity due to pests, soil infertility, and inadequate farmer knowledge. The Davao region is the country’s top cacao producer, but some of its areas still experience low productivity. Hence, it is critical to understand the region’s production capacities and probe the underlying factors behind this. Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), the technical efficiency (TE) of cacao farmers from Davao de Oro was estimated. Tobit regression was used to analyze factors affecting TE. Findings suggest that education, farm experience, and income from cacao improve efficiency; while age, pod sleeving, number of coconut crops intercropped, subsidies, extension services, and total household income negatively impact it. This study recommends enhancing collaboration among the government, public, and private sectors to address these challenges, focusing on infrastructure, market linkage, and technical training. Formal education must also be promoted. Cacao farm rehabilitation and continuous research are also crucial in reducing risks of pest and disease infestations and further promote efficiency. Lastly, regular monitoring and assessment of these strategies are essential to ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Placencia, Shemaiah Gail P. & Carbonell, Alessa Keith E. & Digal, Larry N. & Balgos, Carol Q., . "Factors Influencing the Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Cacao Farmers in Davao de Oro, Philippines," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 22(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:phajad:358993
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.358993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/358993/files/Placencia%20et%20al_AJAD22.1_June2025.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.358993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yong-bae Ji & Choonjoo Lee, 2010. "Data envelopment analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 10(2), pages 267-280, June.
    2. Golany, B & Roll, Y, 1989. "An application procedure for DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 237-250.
    3. Coelli, Tim J., 1995. "Recent Developments In Frontier Modelling And Efficiency Measurement," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 39(3), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Coelli, Tim J. & Battese, George E., 1996. "Identification Of Factors Which Influence The Technical Inefficiency Of Indian Farmers," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 40(2), pages 1-26, August.
    5. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Puig-Junoy, Jaume & Argiles, Josep M., 2004. "The influence of management accounting use on farm inefficiency," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 5(2), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Alessandra Cepparulo & Gilles Mourre, 2020. "How and How Much? The Growth-Friendliness of Public Spending through the Lens," European Economy - Discussion Papers 132, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    3. Jaume Puig & Josep M. Argilés, 2000. "Measuring and explaining farm inefficiency in a panel data set of mixed farms," Economics Working Papers 503, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    4. OA Oyebamiji & ZS Kisava & JN Harris, 2021. "Irrigation and Productivity Empirical Insight of Farming Households in Tchien District," Current Investigations in Agriculture and Current Research, Lupine Publishers, LLC, vol. 9(2), pages 1196-1204, February.
    5. Nelson Mango & Clifton Makate & Benjamin Hanyani-Mlambo & Shephard Siziba & Mark Lundy & Caroline Elliott, 2015. "A stochastic frontier analysis of technical efficiency in smallholder maize production in Zimbabwe: The post-fast-track land reform outlook," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1117189-111, December.
    6. Liu, John S. & Lu, Louis Y.Y. & Lu, Wen-Min & Lin, Bruce J.Y., 2013. "A survey of DEA applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 893-902.
    7. repec:aer:wpaper:172 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. I. Fraser & W. Horrace, 2003. "Technical Efficiency of Australian Wool Production: Point and Confidence Interval Estimates," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 169-190, September.
    9. Dhungana, Basanta R. & Nuthall, Peter L. & Nartea, Gilbert V., 2004. "Measuring the economic inefficiency of Nepalese rice farms using data envelopment analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(2), pages 1-23.
    10. William Orlando Prieto Bustos & Joan Miguel Tejedor Estupiñán, 2019. "Eficiencia Técnica de las Instituciones Públicas Locales en Colombia," Revista de Estudios Regionales, Universidades Públicas de Andalucía, vol. 2, pages 15-41.
    11. Paolo Esposito & Emanuele Doronzo & Spiridione Lucio Dicorato, 2023. "The financial and green effects of cultural values on mission drifts in European social enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 1-29, January.
    12. Ozlem Cosgun & Amjad Umar & Dursun Delen, 2024. "Operational assessment of nursing homes at times of pandemic: an integrated DEA and machine learning approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1-40, December.
    13. Umeh, Joseph Chinedu & Asogwa, B.C., 2005. "Farm Management Dividends in a Friendly Policy Environment: The Case of Cassava Industry in Nigeria," 15th Congress, Campinas SP, Brazil, August 14-19, 2005 24268, International Farm Management Association.
    14. Banchayehu Tessema Assefa & Jordan Chamberlin & Pytrik Reidsma & João Vasco Silva & Martin K. Ittersum, 2020. "Correction to: Unravelling the variability and causes of smallholder maize yield gaps in Ethiopia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(2), pages 489-490, April.
    15. Thuzar Linn & Broos Maenhout, 2019. "The impact of environmental uncertainty on the performance of the rice supply chain in the Ayeyarwaddy Region, Myanmar," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-29, December.
    16. Navichoc, David & Alamneh, Mengistu & Mortara Batistic, Paulo & Dietz, Thomas & Kilian, Bernard, 2024. "Voluntary sustainability standards and technical efficiency of Honduran smallholder coffee producers," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    17. Gabriella De Bernardo & Gennaro Punzo & Rosalia Castellano, 2026. "Tackling negative externalities in well-being efficiency analysis: accounting for socio-economic and environmental costs," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Meili Huan & Fengxia Dong & Liang Chi, 2022. "Mechanization services, factor allocation, and farm efficiency: Evidence from China," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 1618-1639, August.
    19. Quoc Ngu Vu, 2002. "Technical Efficiency of Vietnamese Industrial SOEs and Non-SOEs," International and Development Economics Working Papers idec02-6, International and Development Economics.
    20. Konstantinos Giannakas & K. Tran & Vangelis Tzouvelekas, 1999. "On the Choice of Functional Form in Stochastic Frontiers Models: A Box-Cox Approach," Working Papers 9915, University of Crete, Department of Economics.
    21. Khush Bukhat Zahid, 2023. "Household Market Participation, Access, and Farm Productivity in AJK: Evidence from Farm Household Data," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 62(3), pages 375-394.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:phajad:358993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/searcph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.