IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joaaec/352120.html

Benefits of an Animal Traceability System for a Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreak: A Supply-Driven Social Accounting Matrix Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Man-Keun
  • Ukkestad, C. Michael
  • Tejeda, Hernan A.
  • Bailey, Deevon

Abstract

This study reports the findings for an analysis using the computer program NAADSM (North American Animal Disease Spread Model) and a supply-driven social accounting matrix to examine the impact of a hypothetical foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreak in a relatively isolated part of the United States, Utah, under various levels of livestock traceability. The analysis demonstrates that a significant regional economic impact in Utah would result from an FMD outbreak but that improved levels of traceability would be very important in helping to reduce the negative economic consequences of the outbreak.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Man-Keun & Ukkestad, C. Michael & Tejeda, Hernan A. & Bailey, Deevon, . "Benefits of an Animal Traceability System for a Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreak: A Supply-Driven Social Accounting Matrix Approach," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 49(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:352120
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.352120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/352120/files/benefits-of-an-animal-traceability-system-for-a-foot-and-mouth-disease-outbreak-a-supply-driven-social-accounting-matrix-approach.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.352120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DeeVon Bailey & Jeremy Slade, 2004. "Factors Influencing Support for a National Animal Identification System for Cattle in the United States," Working Papers 2004-09, Utah State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Bailey, DeeVon & Slade, Jeremy, 2004. "Factors Influencing Support For A National Animal Identification System In The United States," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20293, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Paarlberg, Philip L. & Hillberg, Ann & Lee, John G. & Mathews, Kenneth H., Jr., 2008. "Economic Impacts of Foreign Animal Disease," Economic Research Report 56453, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bailey, DeeVon, 2007. "Political Economy of the U.S. Cattle and Beef Industry: Innovation Adoption and Implications for the Future," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 32(3), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Schulz, Lee L. & Tonsor, Glynn T., 2010. "Cow-Calf Producer Perceptions Regarding Individual Animal Traceability," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(4), pages 659-677, November.
    3. Resende Filho, Moises de Andrade & Buhr, Brian L., 2006. "Economic Evidence of Willingness to Pay for the National Animal Identification System in the US," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25342, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Schroeder, Ted C. & Tonsor, Glynn T., 2012. "International cattle ID and traceability: Competitive implications for the US," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 31-40.
    5. Lee L. Schulz & Glynn T. Tonsor, 2010. "Cow‐Calf Producer Preferences for Voluntary Traceability Systems," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 138-162, February.
    6. Resende Filho, Moises de Andrade & Buhr, Brian L., 2008. "Sobre O Valor Econômico Do Sistema De Identificação Animal Dos Eua (Nais): Notícias A Respeito Do Mau Da Vaca Louca Afetam O Consumo De Carnes?," 46th Congress, July 20-23, 2008, Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil 112719, Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administracao e Sociologia Rural (SOBER).
    7. Feng, Siyi & Patton, Myles & Davis, John, "undated". "Market Impact of FMD Control Strategies: A UK Case Study," 91st Annual Conference, April 24-26, 2017, Royal Dublin Society, Dublin, Ireland 258658, Agricultural Economics Society.
    8. Schroeder, Ted C. & Pendell, Dustin L. & Sanderson, Michael W. & McReynolds, Sara, 2025. "Economic Impact of Alternative FMD Emergency Vaccination Strategies in the Midwestern United States," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(01), January.
    9. Peter R. Tozer & Thomas. L. Marsh & Evgeniy V. Perevodchikov, 2015. "Economic Welfare Impacts of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in the Canadian Beef Cattle Sector," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(2), pages 163-184, June.
    10. Arnaud Rault & Stéphane Krebs, 2011. "Catastrophic risk and risk management, what do we know about livestock epidemics? State of the art and prospects," Working Papers SMART 11-05, INRAE UMR SMART.
    11. Paarlberg, Philip, 2014. "Updated Estimated Economic Welfare Impacts Of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (Pedv)," Working papers 174517, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    12. Thompson, Jada M. & Pendell, Dustin L. & Boyer, Tim & Patyk, Kelly A. & Malladi, Sasidhar & Weaver, J. Todd, 2019. "Economic Impacts of Business Continuity on an Outbreak of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Minnesota Egg Laying Operations," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(2), pages 235-248, May.
    13. Leister, Amanda M. & Paarlberg, Philip L. & Lee, John G., 2015. "Dynamic Effects of Drought on U.S. Crop and Livestock Sectors," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(2), May.
    14. Costa, Rafael & Bessler, David & Rosson, C. Parr, 2015. "The Impacts of Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreaks on the Brazilian Meat Market," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 46(3), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Boisvert, Richard N. & Kay, David & Turvey, Calum G., 2012. "Macroeconomic costs to large scale disruptions of food production: The case of foot- and-mouth disease in the United States," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 1921-1930.
    16. Paarlberg, Philip L. & Seitzinger, Ann Hillberg & Lee, John G. & Haley, Mildred M., 2010. "Prioritization Of Sanitary Restrications Facing U.S. Exports Of Bovine, Porcine, And Ovine For Determination Of Surveillance Needs," Working papers 94031, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    17. Hagerman, Amy D. & Delgado, Amy H. & Schoenbaum, Melissa, 2015. "Alternative Control Strategies with Uncertain Trade Barriers for Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Feedlot Operations," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205393, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Jiang, Xiaojiao & Cassey, Andrew J. & Marsh, Thomas L., 2017. "Economic Consequences For Tree Fruit Intermediaries From Shocks," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 592-616, November.
    19. Longworth, Natasha & Jongeneel, Roel A. & Saatkamp, Helmut W., 2021. "Management of Disease-triggered Shocks in Complex Value Chains: An Ex Ante Analysis of Market Effects of HPAI Control in the Dutch Egg Supply Chain," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 12(03), September.
    20. Mellado, Aida Gonzalez, 2008. "Analysing effects of trade liberalization on household expenditure with an extended version of the GTAP model: The case of Mexico," Conference papers 331740, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:352120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.