IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/arerjl/31473.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration Of Agriculture And Technological Change

Author

Listed:
  • White, Fred C.

Abstract

Market structure has implication for research policies. The public sector reduced its support for technological change for poultry relative to beef and pork after poultry became integrated. However, market integration causes private sector research to be below the optimal level from society's perspective. In order to get the appropriate response from the private sector, the public sector should not reduce its support for technological change after market integration. Instead, the public sector should increase its support for research such as basic science that complements private sector research.

Suggested Citation

  • White, Fred C., 1995. "Integration Of Agriculture And Technological Change," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 24(01), pages 1-8, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:arerjl:31473
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31473/files/24010111.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.31473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. K. Lindner & F. G. Jarrett, 1978. "Supply Shifts and the Size of Research Benefits," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(1), pages 48-58.
    2. Centner, Terence J. & White, Fred C., 1989. "Protecting Investors' Intellectual Property Rights In Biotechnology," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas, Greg & Fox, Glenn & Brinkman, George L. & Oxley, Jamie & Gill, Ravinderpal & Junkins, Bruce, 2000. "An Economic Analysis Of The Return To Canadian Swine Research - 1974-1997," Working Papers 34113, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. Martinez, Steve & Zering, Kelly, 1997. "Vertical Coordination and Consumer Welfare: The Case of the Pork Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 262048, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alston, Julian M. & Freebairn, John W. & James, Jennifer S., 2004. "Levy-funded research choices by producers and society," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(01), pages 1-32.
    2. Edwards, Geoff W. & Freebairn, John W., 1982. "The Social Benefits from an Increase in Productivity in a Part of an Industry," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(02), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Brennan, John P. & Bantilan, Ma Cynthia S., 1999. "Impact of ICRISAT Research on Australian Agriculture," Research Reports 28006, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    4. David T. Vere & Randall E. Jones & Garry R. Griffith, 2003. "Economic benefits of public investment in weed management: the case of vulpia in south‐eastern Australia's temperate pasture areas," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 47(4), pages 519-539, December.
    5. Parton, Kevin A. & O'Brien, Melissa J., 2013. "A Farm-Level Approach to Examining Supply Shifts and Research Benefits," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 147088, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Vernon Ruttan, 1980. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 529-547, January.
    7. Kutschukian, Jean-Marc, 2008. "A Framework For The Economic Evaluation Of Environmental Science," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia 6026, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. Parker, Douglas D. & Zilberman, David, 1994. "The Distributional Effects Of Private Sector R&D Management: In-House And At Public Institutions," 1994 Annual Meeting, August 7-10, San Diego, California 271415, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Sureshwaran, Suresh & Thompson, C. Stassen & Henry, Mark S. & Loyd, M.I., 1990. "Economic Surplus And The Distributional Consequences Of Deregulating Tobacco Production," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Salayo, Nerissa D., 2000. "Investment Opportunities for the Shrimp Processing Industry in the Philippines: Results from a Hedonic Analysis," Discussion Papers DP 2000-12, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    11. Byerlee, Derek R. & Anderson, Jock R., 1982. "Risk, Utility and the Value of Information in Farmer Decision Making," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(03), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Pannell, D. J., 1999. "On the estimation of on-farm benefits of agricultural research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 123-134, August.
    13. Goddard, Ellen W, 1995. "Optimal Investment in Generic Advertising and Research: The Case of the Canadian Supply Managed Egg Market Under Partial Trade Liberalization," Working Papers 244802, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    14. Gardner, Bruce L., 2000. "International Trade And The Future Of American Agriculture," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 18(01), pages 1-14, March.
    15. George Verikios, 2006. "Understanding the World Wool Market: Trade, Productivity and Grower Incomes. Part 5: Relative Returns to Australian Wool Producers of On- and Off-Farm Research," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 06-23, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    16. Wilson, Clevo & Tisdell, Clem, 2001. "Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costs," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 449-462, December.
    17. Mullen, John D. & Alston, Julian M., 1995. "The Impact on the Australian Lamb Industry of Producing Larger Leaner Lamb," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(01), pages 1-19, April.
    18. A. C. Herruzo, 1992. "Producer Benefits From Technology Induced Supply Shifts In The Ec Cotton Regime," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 56-63, January.
    19. John D. Mullen & Julian M. Alston & Michael K. Wohlgenant, 1989. "The Impact Of Farm And Processing Research On The Australian Wool Industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 33(1), pages 32-47, April.
    20. Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, 2001. "Uncertainties Of Estimating The Welfare Effects Of Agricultural Biotechnology In The European Union," Working Papers 31828, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:arerjl:31473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nareaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.