IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v12y1995i2p183-192.html

Returns from research in economies with policy distortions: hybrid sorghum in Sudan

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed M. Ahmed
  • William A. Masters
  • John H. Sanders

Abstract

Conventional estimates of the economic return to agricultural research use market prices for the values of products and inputs; on this basis, economic rates of return are typically well above the cost of capital, suggesting that more investment in research would be socially desirable. But these estimates may be incorrect if, as is often the case, market prices are distorted by market failures or government policies and hence do not reflect social values. This paper presents a simple, partial‐equilibrium methodology with which to improve the measurement of social returns to research by taking account of multiple distortions in the market prices of products, inputs and foreign exchange. The method also takes account of variation in domestic and world prices, making a product tradable in some years and nontradable in others. The method is applied to the case of Hageen‐Dura 1 (HD‐1), Sub‐Saharan Africa's first commercially successful hybrid sorghum. HD‐1 was released in the Sudan in 1983. From the start of research in 1979 to 1992, the HD‐1 breeding program had an estimated IRR of 97% when all major policies in the sorghum market, the fertilizer market, and the exchange rate are taken into account. The high rate of return to HD‐1 research was due to the program's low cost and rapid payoff, pointing to the potential value of small adaptive research programs, taking full advantage of foreign technology and genetic material to produce locally‐appropriate crosses in a short period of time. Even in the highly distorted economies of Africa, such programs can yield very high payoffs.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed M. Ahmed & William A. Masters & John H. Sanders, 1995. "Returns from research in economies with policy distortions: hybrid sorghum in Sudan," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 12(2), pages 183-192, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:12:y:1995:i:2:p:183-192
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.1995.tb00362.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1995.tb00362.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1995.tb00362.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mokoena, M.R. & Townsend, R.F. & Kirsten, J.F., 1999. "Cattle Improvement Schemes In South Africa: Measuring The Returns To Research Investments," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 38(01).
    2. Ahmed, Mohamed A.M. & Shideed, Kamel & Mazid, Ahmed, 2010. "Returns to Policy-Oriented Agricultural Research: The Case of Barley Fertilization in Syria," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1462-1472, October.
    3. William A. Masters & Touba Bedingar & James F. Oehmke, 1998. "The impact of agricultural research in Africa: aggregate and case study evidence," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 19(1-2), pages 81-86, September.
    4. Frisvold, George B. & Sullivan, John & Raneses, Anton, 2003. "Genetic improvements in major US crops: the size and distribution of benefits," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 109-119, March.
    5. Maredia, Mywish K. & Byerlee, Derek & Pee, Peter, 2000. "Impacts of food crop improvement research: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 531-559, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:12:y:1995:i:2:p:183-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.