Economic Surplus And The Distributional Consequences Of Deregulating Tobacco Production
Reservations on technical and theoretical grounds in the use of the consumer surplus approach to measure benefits of government programs have often appeared in the literature. Therefore, this paper uses an alternative approach in a case study to estimate the annual economic surplus created in South Carolina from deregulating tobacco production. Impacts of deregulation on cropping patterns and income on representative tobacco farms, and distribution of benefits in the economy are examined. Results of this study indicate that deregulation stimulates the economy and would increase the net value added by $5.8 million in the long run.
Volume (Year): 22 (1990)
Issue (Month): 02 (December)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.saea.org/jaae/jaae.htm|
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Epperson, J. E. & Tyan, H. L. & Carley, D. H., 1982.
"Effects of Removal of the Peanut Program on Georgia Production and Distribution of Selected Fresh Produce,"
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics,
Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(01), pages 153-159, July.
- Epperson, James E. & Tyan, Holly L. & Carley, Dale H., 1982. "Effects Of Removal Of The Peanut Program On Georgia Production And Distribution Of Selected Fresh Produce," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(01), July.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:30000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.