IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/pubcho/v39y1982i2p319-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research revisited — A rejoinder

Author

Listed:
  • Vernon Ruttan

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Vernon Ruttan, 1982. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research revisited — A rejoinder," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 319-329, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:39:y:1982:i:2:p:319-329
    DOI: 10.1007/BF00162124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00162124
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF00162124?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger N. Rose, 1980. "Supply Shifts and Research Benefits: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(4), pages 834-837.
    2. Edwin Mansfield & John Rapoport & Anthony Romeo & Samuel Wagner & George Beardsley, 1977. "Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 91(2), pages 221-240.
    3. R. K. Lindner & F. G. Jarrett, 1980. "Supply Shifts and the Size of Research Benefits: Reply," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(4), pages 841-844.
    4. Norton, George W. & Davis, Jeffrey S., 1979. "Review Of Methods Used To Evaluate Returns To Agricultural Research," Staff Papers 13520, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    5. Davis, Jeffrey S. & Peterson, Willis L., 1981. "The Declining Productivity of Agricultural Research," Evaluation of Agricultural Research, Proceedings of a Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, May 12-13, 1980, Miscellaneous Publication 8 49025, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
    6. Davis, Jeffrey S., 1981. "The Relationship Between the Economic Surplus and Production Function Approaches for Estimating Ex-Post Returns to Agricultural Research," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 49(02), pages 1-11, August.
    7. Zvi Griliches, 1958. "Research Costs and Social Returns: Hybrid Corn and Related Innovations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66, pages 419-419.
    8. William S. Wise & Elisabeth Fell, 1980. "Supply Shifts and the Size of Research Benefits: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(4), pages 838-840.
    9. Vernon Ruttan, 1980. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 529-547, January.
    10. Ruttan, Vernon W., 1980. "Agricultural Research And The Future Of American Agriculture," Staff Papers 13561, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    11. R. K. Lindner & F. G. Jarrett, 1978. "Supply Shifts and the Size of Research Benefits," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(1), pages 48-58.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roseboom, Johannes & Rutten, Hans, 1998. "The transformation of the Dutch agricultural research system: An unfinished agenda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 1113-1126, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Harris & Alan Lloyd, 1991. "The Returns to Agricultural Research and the Underinvestment Hypothesis ‐ A Survey," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 24(3), pages 16-27, July.
    2. Radhakrishnan, Manju & Islam, Nazrul & Ward, Glynn, 2009. "Measuring the benefits from R&D investment beyond the farm gate: the case of the WA wine industry," 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia 48169, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    3. John B. Horowitz & Michael A. Karls & Juan Sesmero & T. Norman Van Cott, 2023. "Beyond Simple Profit Maximization in Uncertain Markets: How Innovation and Entry Change Supply Curves and Producer Surplus," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 38(Summer 20), pages 55-77.
    4. Vere, David T. & Sinden, Jack A. & Campbell, M.H., 1980. "Social Benefits of Serrated Tussock Control in New South Wales," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(03), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Davis, Jeff & Bantilan, Ma Cynthia S. & Nedumaran, Swanikannu & Charyulu, Deevi Kumara, 2014. "The importance of disaggregation for understanding research impacts and modelling adoption," 2014 Conference (58th), February 4-7, 2014, Port Macquarie, Australia 165820, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Miller, Gay & Rosenblatt, Joseph & Hushak, Leroy, 1987. "The Effects Of Supply Shifts On Producers Surplus," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 270116, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Alston, Julian M. & Freebairn, John W. & James, Jennifer S., 2004. "Levy-funded research choices by producers and society," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(1), pages 1-32.
    8. Edwards, Geoff W. & Freebairn, John W., 1982. "The Social Benefits from an Increase in Productivity in a Part of an Industry," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(02), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Fox, Glenn, 1985. "Social Rates Of Return To Public Investment In Agricultural Research And The Underinvestment Hypothesis: An Agnostic View," Staff Papers 14054, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    10. A. C. Herruzo, 1992. "Producer Benefits From Technology Induced Supply Shifts In The Ec Cotton Regime," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 56-63, January.
    11. Hall, Bronwyn H. & Mairesse, Jacques & Mohnen, Pierre, 2010. "Measuring the Returns to R&D," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1033-1082, Elsevier.
    12. Widmer, Lorne & Fox, Glenn & Brinkman, George, 1987. "The Rate of Return to Beef Cattle Research in Canda," Working Papers 244821, University of Guelph, Department of Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    13. Parton, Kevin A. & O'Brien, Melissa J., 2013. "A Farm-Level Approach to Examining Supply Shifts and Research Benefits," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 147088, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    14. Demont, Matty & Tollens, Eric, 2001. "Uncertainties Of Estimating The Welfare Effects Of Agricultural Biotechnology In The European Union," Working Papers 31828, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centre for Agricultural and Food Economics.
    15. T. J. P. Voon, 1992. "A Cross‐Commodity Appraisal Of Demand‐Raising Research Benefits: Pork And Chicken In Australia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 243-247, May.
    16. Frisvold, George B. & Sullivan, John & Raneses, Anton, 2003. "Genetic improvements in major US crops: the size and distribution of benefits," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 109-119, March.
    17. Brennan, John P. & Godyn, Dirk L. & Johnston, Brian G., 1989. "An Economic Framework for Evaluating New Wheat Varieties," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 57(01-02-03), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Will Martin & Julian M. Alston, 1997. "Producer Surplus without Apology? Evaluating Investments in RD," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 73(221), pages 146-158, June.
    19. E. Pasour & Marc Johnson, 1982. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research revisited," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 301-317, January.
    20. Cooke, Stephen C. & Sundquist, W. Burt, 1987. "Cost Structures, Productivities and the Distribution of Technology Benefits Among Producers for Major U.S. Field Crops," Evaluating Agricultural Research and Productivity, Proceedings of a Workshop, Atlanta, Georgia, January 29-30, 1987, Miscellaneous Publication 52 50020, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:39:y:1982:i:2:p:319-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.