Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Net Campaign Contributions, Agricultural Interests, and Votes on Liberalizing Trade with China

Contents:

Author Info

Abstract

We consider the potential influence of contributions from interest groups to political rivals in the voting behavior of US legislators on international trade policy issues. Our application addresses the determinants of the Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China decision, and focuses particular attention on the agriculture/agribusiness lobby. A simultaneous voting-net contributions model suggests that these contributions were very effective relative to organized labor and other corporate groups, despite their relatively small dollar value. Possible explanations arising from differences in targeting strategies are explored.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: ftp://repec.bus.usu.edu/RePEc/uth/wpaper/DEFWP2011-02.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Utah State University, Department of Economics and Finance in its series Working Papers with number 201102.

as in new window
Length: 31 pages
Date of creation: 20 Jan 2011
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:uth:wpaper:201102

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 3565 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-3565
Phone: 1-435-797-2314
Fax: 1-435-797-2314
Web page: http://huntsman.usu.edu/economicsandfinance/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Trade policy; agricultural political economy; binary choice models; China;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. David Orden, 1994. "Agricultural Interest Groups and the North American Free Trade Agreement," NBER Working Papers 4790, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  2. Gawande, Kishore & Hoekman, Bernard, 2006. "Lobbying and agricultural trade policy in the United States," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3819, The World Bank.
  3. Jacob N. Arendt, 2002. "Endogeneity and Heterogeneity in LDV Panel Data Models," 10th International Conference on Panel Data, Berlin, July 5-6, 2002, International Conferences on Panel Data D6-1, International Conferences on Panel Data.
  4. Dana L. Hoag & Thomas G. Field, 1999. "Political and Economic Factors Affecting Agricultural PAC Contribution Strategies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(2), pages 397-407.
  5. Amemiya, Takeshi, 1978. "The Estimation of a Simultaneous Equation Generalized Probit Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 46(5), pages 1193-1205, September.
  6. Baldwin, Robert E & Magee, Christopher S, 2000. " Is Trade Policy for Sale? Congressional Voting on Recent Trade Bills," Public Choice, Springer, Springer, vol. 105(1-2), pages 79-101, October.
  7. Christian Hansen & Jerry Hausman & Whitney Newey, 2006. "Estimation with many instrumental variables," CeMMAP working papers, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies CWP19/06, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
  8. Pauline Abetti, 2008. "Congressional voting on DR-CAFTA: the ineffectiveness of environmental lobbying," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 11-20.
  9. Benjamin Liebman & Kara M. Olson, 2004. "The Returns from Rent-Seeking: Campaign Contributions, Firm Subsidies, and the Byrd Amendment," International Trade, EconWPA 0408003, EconWPA.
  10. Laffont, J.-J., 1999. "Political Economy, Information and Incentives," Papers, Toulouse - GREMAQ 99.516, Toulouse - GREMAQ.
  11. Baban Hasnat & Charles Callahan, 2002. "A political economic analysis of Congressional voting on permanent normal trade relations of China," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(7), pages 465-468.
  12. James E. Rauch & Vitor Trindade, 1999. "Ethnic Chinese Networks in International Trade," NBER Working Papers 7189, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  13. Pauline Abetti, 2008. "Congressional voting on DR-CAFTA: the ineffectiveness of environmental lobbying," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 11-20.
  14. Yogesh Uppal, 2010. "Estimating Incumbency Effects In U.S. State Legislatures: A Quasi-Experimental Study," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 180-199, 07.
  15. Oberholzer-Gee, Felix & Waldfogel, Joel, 2005. "Strength in Numbers: Group Size and Political Mobilization," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 48(1), pages 73-91, April.
  16. Stock, James H & Wright, Jonathan H & Yogo, Motohiro, 2002. "A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(4), pages 518-29, October.
  17. Levitt, Steven D, 1994. "Using Repeat Challengers to Estimate the Effect of Campaign Spending on Election Outcomes in the U.S. House," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 102(4), pages 777-98, August.
  18. Yatchew, Adonis & Griliches, Zvi, 1985. "Specification Error in Probit Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 67(1), pages 134-39, February.
  19. Omer Gokcekus & Richard Fishler, 2006. "The Cotton Influence Index: An Examination of U.S. Cotton Subsidies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(2), pages 299-309.
  20. Stratmann, Thomas, 1992. "Are Contributions Rational? Untangling Strategies of Political Action Committees," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 100(3), pages 647-64, June.
  21. Newey, Whitney K., 1987. "Efficient estimation of limited dependent variable models with endogenous explanatory variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 231-250, November.
  22. Fisher, Robert C. & Gokcekus, Omer & Tower, Edward, 2002. "'Steeling' House Votes at Low Prices for the Steel Import Quota Bill of 1999," Working Papers, Duke University, Department of Economics 02-24, Duke University, Department of Economics.
  23. Roberto Rigobon & Thomas M. Stoker, 2007. "Estimation With Censored Regressors: Basic Issues," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1441-1467, November.
  24. Stratmann, Thomas, 1995. "Campaign Contributions and Congressional Voting: Does the Timing of Contributions Matter?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 77(1), pages 127-36, February.
  25. Lohmann, Susanne, 1995. " Information, Access, and Contributions: A Signaling Model of Lobbying," Public Choice, Springer, Springer, vol. 85(3-4), pages 267-84, December.
  26. Rigobon, Roberto & Stoker, Thomas M., 2009. "Bias From Censored Regressors," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 27(3), pages 340-353.
  27. Chappell, Henry W, Jr, 1982. "Campaign Contributions and Congressional Voting: A Simultaneous Probit-Tobit Model," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 64(1), pages 77-83, February.
  28. Laffont, Jean-Jacques, 1999. "Political economy, information and incentives1," European Economic Review, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 43(4-6), pages 649-669, April.
  29. Rivers, Douglas & Vuong, Quang H., 1988. "Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 347-366, November.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uth:wpaper:201102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (John Gilbert).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.