Disclosure is widely assumed to play an important role in corporate governance. Yet governance has not been the focus of previous academic analyses of disclosure. We consider disclosure in the context of corporate governance. We argue that disclosure is a two-edged sword. On one side, disclosure of information permits principals to make better decisions. On the other, it can create or exacerbate agency problems: The release of information has the potential to harm agents (e.g., management) either through the actions the principals take as a consequence (e.g., dismiss the agent) or because the agents care about how they are perceived (e.g., the agents have career concerns or hold equity in the firm). This can lead agents to pursue actions that are not in the principals' interests. Moreover, these problems become worse, the more precise the principals' information. We present a series of models formalizing this idea. These models lead to a number of empirical implications, both for disclosure-increasing regulations and for the relation between disclosure and governance.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics in its series Working Paper Series with number
2008-17.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: