IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login

Citations for "Weak and Strong Monotone Comparative Statics"

by Shannon, Chris

For a complete description of this item, click here. For a RSS feed for citations of this item, click here.
as in new window

  1. Aliprantis, Charalambos D. & Harris, David & Tourky, Rabee, 2007. "Riesz estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 431-456, February.
  2. Sunanda Roy & Tarun Sabarwal, 2008. "On the (non-)lattice structure of the equilibrium set in games with strategic substitutes," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 161-169, October.
  3. Edlin, Aaron S. & Shannon, Chris, 1998. "Strict Monotonicity in Comparative Statics," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 201-219, July.
  4. CALCIANO, Filippo L., 2007. "Games with complementarities," CORE Discussion Papers 2007016, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  5. Agliardi, Elettra, 2000. "A generalization of supermodularity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 251-254, September.
  6. Leonard J Mirman & Olivier F. Morand & Kevin L. Reffett, 2004. "A Qualitative Approach to Markovian Equilibrium in Infinite Horizon Economies with Capital," Levine's Bibliography 122247000000000224, UCLA Department of Economics.
  7. Hector Chade & Edward Schlee, 2008. "Optimal Insurance with Adverse Selection," Levine's Working Paper Archive 122247000000002175, David K. Levine.
  8. Kukushkin, Nikolai S., 2011. "Monotone comparative statics: Changes in preferences vs changes in the feasible set," MPRA Paper 31612, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  9. Roy, Sunanda & Sabarwal, Tarun, 2012. "Characterizing stability properties in games with strategic substitutes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 337-353.
  10. AMIR, Rabah, 2004. "Ordinal versus cardinal complementarity : the case of cournot oligopoly," CORE Discussion Papers 2004036, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  11. Luís Santos-Pinto, 2009. "Asymmetries in Information Processing in a Decision Theory Framework," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 66(4), pages 317-343, April.
  12. Randy Silvers, 2006. "The Value of Information in an Agency Model with Moral Hazard," Economics Series 2006_22, Deakin University, Faculty of Business and Law, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance.
  13. Jonathan Levin & Susan Athey, 2001. "The Value of Information in Monotone Decision Problems," Working Papers 01003, Stanford University, Department of Economics.
  14. Manjira Datta & Leonard J. Mirman & Olivier F. Morand & Kevin L. Reffett, 2002. "Monotone Methods for Markovian Equilibrium in Dynamic Economies," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-086/2, Tinbergen Institute.
  15. McAdams, David, 2002. "Isotone Equilibrium in Games of Incomplete Information," Working papers 4248-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
  16. Roy, Sunanda & Sabarwal, Tarun, 2005. "Monotone Comparative Statics for Games with Strategic Substitutes," MPRA Paper 4709, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 04 Sep 2007.
  17. Kukushkin, Nikolai S., 2010. "On the existence of most-preferred alternatives in complete lattices," MPRA Paper 27504, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  18. Manjira Datta & Kevin L. Reffett, 2005. "Isotone Recursive Methods: the Case of Homogeneous Agents," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-012/2, Tinbergen Institute.
  19. Manjira Datta & Leonard J. Mirman & Olivier F. Morand & Kevin L. Reffett, 2002. "Monotone Methods for Markovian Equilibrium in Dynamic Economies," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 02-086/2, Tinbergen Institute.
  20. Daron Acemoglu & Martin Kaae Jensen, 2012. "Robust Comparative Statics in Large Dynamic Economies," Levine's Working Paper Archive 786969000000000507, David K. Levine.
  21. Randy Silvers, 2006. "The Value of Information in a Principal-Agent Model with Moral Hazard: The Ex Ante Contracting Case," Economics Series 2006_23, Deakin University, Faculty of Business and Law, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance.
  22. AMIR, Rabah, 2003. "Supermodularity and complementarity in economics: an elementary survey," CORE Discussion Papers 2003104, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  23. Andrew Monaco & Tarun Sabarwal, 2012. "Games with Strategic Heterogeneity," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 201240, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2012.
  24. Kukushkin, Nikolai S., 2012. "Cournot tatonnement and potentials," MPRA Paper 43188, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  25. Manjira Datta & Kevin L. Reffett, 2005. "Isotone Recursive Methods: the Case of Homogeneous Agents," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-012/2, Tinbergen Institute.
  26. Manjira Datta & Leonard Mirman & Olivier F. Morand & Kevin Reffett, 2001. "Monotone Methods for Distorted Economies," Working papers 2001-03, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
  27. Kevin Reffett & Manjira Datta & Leonard Mirman & Olivier Morand, . "Monotone Methods for Markovian Equilibrium in Dynamic Economies," Working Papers 2133476, Department of Economics, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University.
  28. Kukushkin, Nikolai S., 2013. "Approximate Nash equilibrium under the single crossing conditions," MPRA Paper 44320, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  29. Schlee, Edward E., 2001. "Buyer experimentation and introductory pricing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 347-362, March.
  30. Nikolai Kukushkin, 2013. "Monotone comparative statics: changes in preferences versus changes in the feasible set," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 1039-1060, April.
  31. Kultti, Klaus & Salonen, Hannu, 1997. "Undominated Equilibria in Games with Strategic Complementarities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 98-115, January.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.