IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/ema/worpap/2004-23.html

Environmental Policy and Growth when Inputs are Differentiated in Pollution Intensity

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Andri Brenner, 2021. "The Social Power of Spillover Effects: Educating Against Environmental Externalities," CEPA Discussion Papers 35, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
  2. Tilmann Rave & Ursula Triebswetter, 2006. "Economic impacts of environmental regulations," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 30.
  3. Bergmann, Tobias & Kalkuhl, Matthias, 2025. "Decoupling economic growth from energy use: The role of energy intensity in an endogenous growth model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
  4. Cheng, Chu-chuan & Chen, Ping-ho & Chu, Hsun & Wang, Yi-chiuan, 2024. "What growth policies protect the environment? A two-engine growth model," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
  5. Dong, Zhaoyingzi & Xia, Chuyu & Fang, Kai & Zhang, Weiwen, 2022. "Effect of the carbon emissions trading policy on the co-benefits of carbon emissions reduction and air pollution control," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
  6. Peter K. Kruse-Andersen, 2016. "Directed Technical Change and Economic Growth Effects of Environmental Policy," Discussion Papers 16-06, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
  7. Groth, Christian & Ricci, Francesco, 2011. "Optimal growth when environmental quality is a research asset," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 340-352, December.
  8. Chu, Hsun & Lai, Ching-chong & Liao, Chih-hsing, 2016. "A Note On Environment-Dependent Time Preferences," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(6), pages 1652-1667, September.
  9. Medalla, Erlinda M. & Lazaro, Dorothea C., 2005. "Does Trade Lead to a Race to the Bottom in Environmental Standards? Another Look at the Issues," Discussion Papers DP 2005-23, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  10. Ricci, Francesco, 2007. "Channels of transmission of environmental policy to economic growth: A survey of the theory," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 688-699, February.
  11. Maria A Cunha-e-Sa & Alexandra Leitao & Ana Balcao Reis, 2010. "Innovation and environmental policy: clean vs. dirty technical change," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp548, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
  12. Oscar Afonso & Ana Catarina Afonso, 2015. "Endogenous Growth Effects of Environmental Policies," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 62(5), pages 607-629, December.
  13. Xiangyang Li & Guochao Liu & Yufei Zhao & Yanhan Sun & Jianluan Guo, 2024. "Regional Green Development and Corporate Financialization: A Quasi-Natural Experiment on the Ecological Conservation and High-Quality Development of the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-19, May.
  14. Sjak Smulders & Michael Toman & Cees Withagen, 2014. "Growth Theory and “Green Growthâ€," OxCarre Working Papers 135, Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University of Oxford.
  15. Joan Canton & Ariane Labat & Anton Roodhuijzen, 2010. "An indicator-based assessment framework to identify country-specific challenges towards greener grow," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 401, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
  16. Ryo Horii & Masako Ikefuji, 2014. "Environment and Growth," DSSR Discussion Papers 21, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
  17. Jin, Wei & Zhang, ZhongXiang, "undated". "From Energy-intensive to Innovation-led Growth: On the Transition Dynamics of China’s Economy," Energy: Resources and Markets 190757, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
  18. David Hémous & Morten Olsen, 2021. "Directed Technical Change in Labor and Environmental Economics," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 571-597, August.
  19. Smulders, Sjak & Withagen, Cees, 2012. "Green growth -- lessons from growth theory," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6230, The World Bank.
  20. Burghaus, Kerstin & Funk, Peter, 2013. "Endogenous Growth, Green Innovation and GDP Deceleration in a World with Polluting Production Inputs," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 80022, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
  21. Dominique Bianco, 2022. "Does entrepreneurial behaviour matter for the strong Porter hypothesis?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(2), pages 867-876.
  22. Rauscher, Michael, 2009. "Green R&D versus end-of-pipe emission abatement: A model of directed technical change," Thuenen-Series of Applied Economic Theory 106, University of Rostock, Institute of Economics.
  23. Santiago J. Rubio, Jose L. Garcia and Jose L. Hueso, 2009. "Neoclassical Growth, Environment and Technological Change: The Environmental Kuznets Curve," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I).
  24. Dominique Bianco & Evens Salies, 2017. "The Strong Porter Hypothesis in an Endogenous Growth Model with Satisficing Managers," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(4), pages 2641-2654.
  25. Dechezlepretre, Antoine & Martin, Ralf & Mohnen, Myra, 2014. "Knowledge spillovers from clean and dirty technologies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60501, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  26. Mavi, Can Askan, 2024. "Creative destruction vs destructive destruction: A Schumpeterian approach for adaptation and mitigation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 36-53.
  27. Minoru Nakada, 2010. "Environmental Tax Reform and Growth: Income Tax Cuts or Profits Tax Reduction," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 47(4), pages 549-565, December.
  28. Can Askan Mavi, 2017. "Creative Destruction vs Destructive Destruction ? : A Schumpeterian Approach for Adaptation and Mitigation," Working Papers halshs-01455297, HAL.
  29. Itaya, Jun-ichi, 2008. "Can environmental taxation stimulate growth? The role of indeterminacy in endogenous growth models with environmental externalities," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 1156-1180, April.
  30. Hart, Rob, 2004. "Growth, environment and innovation--a model with production vintages and environmentally oriented research," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 1078-1098, November.
  31. Afonso, Oscar, 2023. "Fiscal and monetary effects on environmental quality, growth, and welfare," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 202-219.
  32. Kruse-Andersen, Peter K., 2025. "Directed technical change and economic growth effects of environmental policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
  33. Jin, Wei & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2014. "Quo Vadis? Energy Consumption and Technological Innovation," Working Papers 249494, Australian National University, Centre for Climate Economics & Policy.
  34. Walheer, Barnabé, 2018. "Labour productivity growth and energy in Europe: A production-frontier approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 129-143.
  35. Dominique Bianco, 2017. "Environmental Policy in an Endogenous Growth Model with Expanding Variety," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 127(6), pages 1013-1028.
  36. Peter K. Kruse-Andersen, 2019. "Directed Technical Change, Environmental Sustainability, and Population Growth," Discussion Papers 19-12, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
  37. Wei Jin & ZhongXiang Zhang, 2014. "Quo Vadis? Energy Consumption and Technological Innovation in China's Economic Growth," CCEP Working Papers 1412, Centre for Climate & Energy Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
  38. Carraro, Carlo & De Cian, Enrica & Nicita, Lea & Massetti, Emanuele & Verdolini, Elena, 2010. "Environmental Policy and Technical Change: A Survey," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 4(2), pages 163-219, October.
  39. Alejandro Caparrós & Richard E. Just & David Zilberman, 2015. "Dynamic Relative Standards versus Emission Taxes in a Putty-Clay Model," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(2), pages 277-308.
  40. Anton Bondarev & Alfred Greiner, 2022. "How ongoing structural change creates a double dividend: outdating of technologies and green growth," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 21(2), pages 125-160, May.
  41. Karmaker, Shamal Chandra & Hosan, Shahadat & Chapman, Andrew J. & Saha, Bidyut Baran, 2021. "The role of environmental taxes on technological innovation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
  42. Dong, Zhaoyingzi & Wang, Shaojian & Zhang, Weiwen & Shen, Huijun, 2022. "The dynamic effect of environmental regulation on firms’ energy consumption behavior-Evidence from China's industrial firms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
  43. Kruse-Andersen, Peter Kjær, 2023. "Directed technical change, environmental sustainability, and population growth," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
  44. Koesler, Simon, 2010. "Pollution externalities in a Schumpeterian growth model," ZEW Discussion Papers 10-055, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.