IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/jfinec/v20y1988ip377-417.html

The effect of poison pill securities on shareholder wealth

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Goergen, Marc & Manjon, Miguel C. & Renneboog, Luc, 2008. "Recent developments in German corporate governance," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 175-193, September.
  2. Alexandra Lai & Raphael Solomon, 2006. "Ownership Concentration and Competition in Banking Markets," Staff Working Papers 06-7, Bank of Canada.
  3. Beatty, Anne, 1995. "The cash flow and informational effects of employee stock ownership plans," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 211-240, June.
  4. James Forjan & Bonnie Van Ness, 2003. "An Investigation of Poison Pill Securities, Long-Term Debt, and the Wealth of Shareholders," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 18(2 Y), pages 17-22.
  5. Ana Isabel Fernandez & Silvia Gomez, 1997. "La adopción de acuerdos estatutarios antiadquisición. Evidencia en el mercado de capitales español," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 21(1), pages 129-138, January.
  6. Kenneth A. Borokhovich & Kelly R. Brunarski & Yvette Harman & James B. Kehr, 2005. "Dividends, Corporate Monitors and Agency Costs," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 40(1), pages 37-65, February.
  7. Gigante, Gimede & Angioni, Ottavio, 2023. "The impact of preventive takeover defences on corporate financial performance: Evidence from the US," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
  8. Veld, C.H., 1991. "Motives for the use of equity-warrants by Dutch companies," Other publications TiSEM 65df228c-ddcd-4604-882e-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  9. Thomas P. Boehm & Ramon P. DeGennaro, 2011. "A discrete choice model of dividend reinvestment plans: classification and prediction," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 215-229, June.
  10. Forjan, James M., 1999. "The wealth effects of shareholder-sponsored proposals," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 61-72, June.
  11. Prokop, Jacek, 2002. "Taktyki defensywne przeciwko przejęciom," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2002(11-12), November.
  12. Comment, Robert & Schwert, G. William, 1995. "Poison or placebo? Evidence on the deterrence and wealth effects of modern antitakeover measures," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 3-43, September.
  13. Cotter, James F. & Shivdasani, Anil & Zenner, Marc, 1997. "Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 195-218, February.
  14. Vicente Cuñat & Mireia Giné & Maria Guadalupe, 2020. "Price and Probability: Decomposing the Takeover Effects of Anti‐Takeover Provisions," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(5), pages 2591-2629, October.
  15. Molin, Johan, 1996. "Optimal deterrence and inducement of takeovers: An analysis of poison pills and dilution," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 102, Stockholm School of Economics.
  16. Souther, Matthew E., 2016. "The effects of takeover defenses: Evidence from closed-end funds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 420-440.
  17. Mulherin, J. Harold & Poulsen, Annette B., 1998. "Proxy contests and corporate change: implications for shareholder wealth," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 279-313, March.
  18. Strickland, Deon & Wiles, Kenneth W. & Zenner, Marc, 1996. "A requiem for the USA Is small shareholder monitoring effective?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 319-338, February.
  19. Denis, David J. & Serrano, Jan M., 1996. "Active investors and management turnover following unsuccessful control contests," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 239-266, February.
  20. Bebchuk, Lucian A. & Cohen, Alma, 2005. "The costs of entrenched boards," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 409-433, November.
  21. Jandik, Tomas & Makhija, Anil K., 2005. "Debt, debt structure and corporate performance after unsuccessful takeovers: evidence from targets that remain independent," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 11(5), pages 882-914, October.
  22. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997. "A Survey of Corporate Governance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-783, June.
  23. Sikes, Stephanie A. & Tian, Xiaoli (Shaolee) & Wilson, Ryan, 2014. "Investors׳ reaction to the use of poison pills as a tax loss preservation tool," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 132-148.
  24. Peter M. Clarkson & Allen Craswell & Prue Mackenzie, 2008. "The Effect of Board Independence on Target Shareholder Wealth," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(2), pages 135-148, June.
  25. Henry Tosi, 2008. "Quo Vadis? Suggestions for future corporate governance research," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 12(2), pages 153-169, May.
  26. Krishnan Maheswaran & Sean Pinder, 2005. "Australian evidence on the determinants and impact of takeover resistance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 45(4), pages 613-633, December.
  27. Jandik, Tomas & Makhija, Anil K., 2004. "Debt, Debt Structure and Corporate Performance after Unsuccessful Takeovers: Evidence from Targets that Remain Independent," Working Paper Series 2005-6, Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics.
  28. Danielson, Morris G. & Karpoff, Jonathan M., 2006. "Do pills poison operating performance?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 536-559, June.
  29. Danielson, Morris G. & Karpoff, Jonathan M., 1998. "On the uses of corporate governance provisions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 347-371, December.
  30. Peer C. Fiss & Mark T. Kennedy & Gerald F. Davis, 2012. "How Golden Parachutes Unfolded: Diffusion and Variation of a Controversial Practice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1077-1099, August.
  31. James M. Mahoney & Joseph T. Mahoney, 1993. "Abstract," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(1), pages 17-31, January.
  32. Zeng, James Si, 2021. "Does regulation of defensive tactics with mandatory rules benefit shareholders? Evidence from event studies in China," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
  33. Heron, Randall A. & Lie, Erik, 2015. "The effect of poison pill adoptions and court rulings on firm entrenchment," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 286-296.
  34. Nanda, Vikram & Yun, Youngkeol, 1996. "Financial innovation and investor wealth: A study of the poison put in convertible bonds," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 1-22, December.
  35. Jordan Schoenfeld, 2020. "Contracts Between Firms and Shareholders," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 58(2), pages 383-427, May.
  36. Al Dah, Bilal, 2018. "Monitoring or empowering CEOs? The moderating effect of shareholder rights," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 502-515.
  37. Lamoreaux, Phillip T. & Litov, Lubomir P. & Mauler, Landon M., 2019. "lead Independent Directors: Good governance or window dressing?," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 47-69.
  38. Karpoff, Jonathan M. & Malatesta, Paul H. & Walkling, Ralph A., 1996. "Corporate governance and shareholder initiatives: Empirical evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 365-395, November.
  39. Randall Morck & Bernard Yeung, 2010. "Agency Problems and the Fate of Capitalism," NBER Working Papers 16490, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  40. Dennis, Patrick J. & Weston, James P., 2025. "Lazy dividends," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
  41. Chen, Dong, 2012. "Classified boards, the cost of debt, and firm performance," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3346-3365.
  42. Daniel Martin Katz & Michael J Bommarito II & Tyler Soellinger & James Ming Chen, 2015. "Law on the Market? Abnormal Stock Returns and Supreme Court Decision-Making," Papers 1508.05751, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
  43. Manry, David & Stangeland, David, 2003. "The United Shareholders Association Shareholder 1000 and firm performance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 353-375, June.
  44. Malhotra, Shavin & Morgan, Horatio M. & Zhu, Pengcheng, 2020. "Corporate governance and firms’ acquisition behavior: The role of antitakeover provisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 26-37.
  45. Morgan, Angela & Poulsen, Annette & Wolf, Jack & Yang, Tina, 2011. "Mutual funds as monitors: Evidence from mutual fund voting," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 914-928, September.
  46. Karpoff, Jonathan M. & Schonlau, Robert & Wehrly, Eric, 2022. "Which antitakeover provisions deter takeovers?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
  47. Goldman, Eitan & Qian, Jun, 2005. "Optimal toeholds in takeover contests," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 321-346, August.
  48. Harris, Oneil & Madura, Jeff, 2010. "Cause and effects of poison pill adoptions by spinoff units," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 307-330, July.
  49. Ryngaert, Michael & Scholten, Ralph, 2010. "Have changing takeover defense rules and strategies entrenched management and damaged shareholders? The case of defeated takeover bids," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 16-37, February.
  50. Lehn, Kenneth & Patro, Sukesh & Zhao, Mengxin, 2007. "Governance indexes and valuation: Which causes which?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 907-928, December.
  51. Kuipers, David R. & Miller, Darius P. & Patel, Ajay, 2009. "The legal environment and corporate valuation: Evidence from cross-border takeovers," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 552-567, October.
  52. Marc Goergen & Christine A. Mallin & Eve Mitleton-Kelly & Ahmed Al-Hawamdeh & Iris H-Y Chiu, 2010. "Corporate Governance and Complexity Theory," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13927.
  53. Gillan, Stuart L. & Starks, Laura T., 2000. "Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the role of institutional investors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 275-305, August.
  54. Atreya Chakraborty & Christopher F. Baum, 1997. "Poison Pills, Optimal Contracting and the Market for Corporate Control: Evidence from Fortune 500 Firms," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 393, Boston College Department of Economics.
  55. Gine, Mireia & Moussawi, Rabih & Sedunov, John, 2017. "Governance mechanisms and effective activism: Evidence from shareholder proposals on poison pills," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 185-202.
  56. Torabzadeh, Khalil M. & Roufagalas, John & Woodruff, Criss G., 2000. "Self-selection and the effects of poison put/call covenants on the reoffering yields of corporate bonds," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 139-156.
  57. Charles Chang & Paul Moon Sub Choi & Seth H. Huang, 2015. "Do Poorly Governed Acquirers Transfer Wealth to Targets in Cross-Border Acquisitions?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 44(3), pages 475-498, September.
  58. Nyberg, Sten, 1995. "Reciprocal shareholding and takeover deterrence," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 355-372, September.
  59. Haan, Marco A. & Riyanto, Yohanes, 2006. "The effects of takeover threats on shareholders and firm value," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 45-68, January.
  60. Laura Casares Field & Jonathan M. Karpoff, 2002. "Takeover Defenses of IPO Firms," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(5), pages 1857-1889, October.
  61. Burch, Timothy R., 2001. "Locking out rival bidders: The use of lockup options in corporate mergers," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 103-141, April.
  62. James M. Forjan, 1999. "The wealth effects of shareholder‐sponsored proposals," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 61-72.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.