IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itse23/277998.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exploring the killer domains to create new value: A Comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos

Author

Listed:
  • Lim, Chulmin
  • Rowsell, Joe
  • Kim, Seongcheol

Abstract

Diversifying business portfolios and creating new value has been considered essential strategy for telcos to survive and grow. In this sense, telcos need to find a promising industry called killer domains and concentrate on these to reduce the risk of business diversification. However, few studies have tried to develop criteria for identifying the killer domains applicable to a diverse industrial environment. Therefore, this study aims to explore the killer domains for Canadian and Korean telcos by developing comprehensive evaluation criteria. This study adopted the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method and surveyed 23 telecommunication experts in Canada and 22 in Korea. From the data analysis, this study found that expected benefit is the most important criterion in decision-making for a telco's business diversification, followed by resource fit and the expected cost. In addition, there were no significant differences in the relative importance of alternative domains in Korea. However, in Canada, digital healthcare was the most crucial domain for Canadian telcos, followed by the security and immersive content industry. The result of this study provides implications for practitioners' and policymakers' decision-making regarding business diversification strategies in the telecommunication industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Lim, Chulmin & Rowsell, Joe & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Exploring the killer domains to create new value: A Comparative case study of Canadian and Korean telcos," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 277998, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itse23:277998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/277998/1/Lim-et-al.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balmer, Roberto E. & Levin, Stanford L. & Schmidt, Stephen, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence Applications in Telecommunications and other network industries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).
    2. David Flacher & Hugues Jennequin, 2008. "Is Telecommunication Regulation efficient? An International Perspective," Post-Print hal-00194618, HAL.
    3. Michael Enowbi Batuo, 2015. "The role of telecommunications infrastructure in the regional economic growth of Africa," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 49(1), pages 313-330, January-M.
    4. Andre P. Liebenberg & David W. Sommer, 2008. "Effects of Corporate Diversification: Evidence From the Property–Liability Insurance Industry," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 75(4), pages 893-919, December.
    5. Paul Westhead & Deniz Ucbasaran & Mike Wright, 2005. "Decisions, Actions, and Performance: Do Novice, Serial, and Portfolio Entrepreneurs Differ?," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 393-417, October.
    6. Huu Thanh Vu & Nguyen Minh Ha, 2021. "A Study on the Relationship Between Diversification and Firm Performance Using the GSEM Method," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(1), pages 85-107, January.
    7. Inderst, Roman & Peitz, Martin, 2012. "Network investment, access and competition," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 407-418.
    8. David J. Teece, 2003. "Towards an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Essays In Technology Management And Policy Selected Papers of David J Teece, chapter 15, pages 419-446, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. Megan Emfosi Meena & Jiaying Geng, 2022. "Dynamic Competition in Telecommunications: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    10. Petra Maresova & Ladislav Hajek & Ondrej Krejcar & Michael Storek & Kamil Kuca, 2020. "New Regulations on Medical Devices in Europe: Are They an Opportunity for Growth?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Cornelius Hafner, 2021. "Diversification in family firms: a systematic review of product and international diversification strategies," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 529-572, April.
    12. Montgomery, Cynthia A. & Hariharan, S., 1991. "Diversified expansion by large established firms," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 71-89, January.
    13. Kai He & Nan Zhu, 2022. "Strategic emerging industry layout based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation: A case study of Sichuan province," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-28, March.
    14. Sara Quach & Park Thaichon & Kelly D. Martin & Scott Weaven & Robert W. Palmatier, 2022. "Digital technologies: tensions in privacy and data," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 1299-1323, November.
    15. James Robins & Margarethe F. Wiersema, 1995. "A resource‐based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(4), pages 277-299.
    16. Flacher, David & Jennequin, Hugues, 2008. "Is telecommunications regulation efficient? An international perspective," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 364-377, June.
    17. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    18. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    19. Sayan Chatterjee & Birger Wernerfelt, 1991. "The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 33-48, January.
    20. Frieden, Rob, 2005. "Lessons from broadband development in Canada, Japan, Korea and the United States," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 595-613, September.
    21. Christine M. Beckman & Pamela R. Haunschild & Damon J. Phillips, 2004. "Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 259-275, June.
    22. Oriol Iglesias & Stefan Markovic & Mehdi Bagherzadeh & Jatinder Jit Singh, 2020. "Co-creation: A Key Link Between Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Trust, and Customer Loyalty," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 151-166, April.
    23. Jane Andrew & Max Baker, 2021. "The General Data Protection Regulation in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(3), pages 565-578, January.
    24. Vasudevan Ramanujam & P. Varadarajan, 1989. "Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(6), pages 523-551, November.
    25. Sylvia Chan-Olmsted & Byeng-Hee Chang, 2003. "Diversification Strategy of Global Media Conglomerates: Examining Its Patterns and Determinants," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 213-233.
    26. Massaro, Maria & Kim, Seongcheol, 2022. "Why is South Korea at the forefront of 5G? Insights from technology systems theory," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5).
    27. Jamieson Odell & Usman Ali, 2016. "ESG Investing in Emerging and Frontier Markets," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 28(2), pages 96-101, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manral, Lalit & Harrigan, Kathryn R., 2018. "The logic of demand-side diversification: Evidence from the US telecommunications sector, 1990–1996," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 127-141.
    2. Mercedes Alda, 2021. "Managers beyond borders: side-by-side management in mutual funds and pension funds," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 399-436, February.
    3. Villalonga, Belen, 2000. "Does Diversification Cause the “Diversification Discount”?," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt40v212gm, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    4. Lasse B. Lien & Peter G. Klein, 2013. "Can the Survivor Principle Survive Diversification?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1478-1494, October.
    5. M. V. Shyam Kumar, 2013. "The Costs of Related Diversification: The Impact of the Core Business on the Productivity of Related Segments," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 1827-1846, December.
    6. Alfredo Jiménez & Diana Benito-Osorio & Carmen Palmero-Cámara, 2015. "Learning from Risky Environments: Global Diversification Strategies of Spanish MNEs," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 485-509, August.
    7. van Oijen, A.A.C.J. & Hendrikse, G.W.J., 2002. "Governance Structure, Product Diversification, and Performance," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-51-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Ron Adner & Peter Zemsky, 2016. "Diversification and Performance: Linking Relatedness, Market Structure, and the Decision to Diversify," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(1), pages 32-55, March.
    9. Lin, Hsing-Er & Hsu, I-Chieh & Hsu, Audrey Wenhsin & Chung, Hsi-Mei, 2020. "Creating competitive advantages: Interactions between ambidextrous diversification strategy and contextual factors from a dynamic capability perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Rene Söllner, 2010. "Product Diversification and Labor Productivity Dispersion in German Manufacturing Industries," Jena Economics Research Papers 2010-028, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    11. Aija Leiponen, 2005. "Core complementarities of the corporation: organization of an innovating firm," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(6), pages 351-365.
    12. Bowen, H.P. & Wiersema, M., 2007. "International and product diversification: their interrelationship and impact on firm performance," Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School Working Paper Series 2007-6, Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School.
    13. Andreas Bausch & Frithjof Pils, 2009. "Product diversification strategy and financial performance: meta-analytic evidence on causality and construct multidimensionality," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 157-190, November.
    14. Elisabeth Nocker & Harry P. Bowen & Christian Stadler, 2012. "Value Chain Relatedness: Strategic Complementarities and Firm Performance," Discussion Paper Series 2012-03, McColl School of Business, Queens University of Charlotte.
    15. Alonso-Borrego, César & Forcadell, Francisco Javier, 2007. "Corporate diversification and R&D intensity dynamics," UC3M Working papers. Economics we078249, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    16. Leiponen, Aija, . "Essays in the Economics of Knowledge: Innovation, Collaboration, and Organizational Complementarities," ETLA A, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, number 31.
    17. Jaeho Choi & Anoop Menon & Haris Tabakovic, 2021. "Using machine learning to revisit the diversification–performance relationship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1632-1661, September.
    18. Marc Gruber & Ian C. MacMillan & James D. Thompson, 2013. "Escaping the Prior Knowledge Corridor: What Shapes the Number and Variety of Market Opportunities Identified Before Market Entry of Technology Start-ups?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 280-300, February.
    19. Brian S. Silverman, 1999. "Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Diversification: Toward an Integration of the Resource-Based View and Transaction Cost Economics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(8), pages 1109-1124, August.
    20. Adrian Lüthge, 2020. "The concept of relatedness in diversification research: review and synthesis," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-35, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itse23:277998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itseurope.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.