IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/glodps/1773.html

Teachers' sick leave and summer timing: an impact evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Delgado-Cubillo, Pablo
  • Moral-Arce, Ignacio
  • Martín-Román, Ángel Luis

Abstract

In the context of the growing share of public workers in the Spanish labour force, this paper analyses opportunistic behaviour in sick leave duration and return-to-work probabilities among teachers. We use administrative microdata (2011-2019), transformed into an original monthly spell-level panel. The analysis employs a tailored regression within a difference-in-differences framework exploiting the academic calendar and comparing professional sick leaves among pre-university teachers in public and private schools. Results show that the timing of sick leave endings systematically responds to the school calendar. Public-school teachers display longer sick leave durations and lower return-to-work probabilities than private-school teachers, consistent with ex post moral hazard under more generous employment protection and sick leave coverage. Around the summer break, these differences become more pronounced: public-school teachers extend their leaves further relative to private-school teachers. Simultaneously, the usual gap in return-to-work probabilities temporarily reverses, with public-school teachers becoming more likely to end their leave immediately after summer. These patterns are especially strong among mid-career workers, women, and cases involving more subjective or difficult-to-diagnose injuries.

Suggested Citation

  • Delgado-Cubillo, Pablo & Moral-Arce, Ignacio & Martín-Román, Ángel Luis, 2026. "Teachers' sick leave and summer timing: an impact evaluation," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1773, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/341162/1/GLO-DP-1773.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Friedl, Andreas & Pondorfer, Andreas & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2020. "Gender differences in social risk taking," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Lídia Farré & Yarine Fawaz & Libertad González & Jennifer Graves, 2022. "Gender Inequality in Paid and Unpaid Work During Covid‐19 Times," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(2), pages 323-347, June.
    3. Magnus Henrekson & Mats Persson, 2004. "The Effects on Sick Leave of Changes in the Sickness Insurance System," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(1), pages 87-114, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martín-Román, Ángel L. & Moral, Alfonso & Pinillos-Franco, Sara, 2026. "Gender differences in the duration of sick leave: Economics or biology?," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    2. Andersson, Fredrik W. & Bokenblom, Mattias & Brantingson, Staffan & Brännström, Susanne Gullberg & Wall, Johan, 2011. "Sick listing—Partly a family phenomenon?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 496-502.
    3. Fevang, Elisabeth & Hardoy, Inés & Røed, Knut, 2013. "Getting Disabled Workers Back to Work: How Important Are Economic Incentives?," IZA Discussion Papers 7137, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Livia Alfonsi & Mary Namubiru & Sara Spaziani, 2024. "Gender gaps: back and here to stay? Evidence from skilled Ugandan workers during COVID-19," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 999-1046, September.
    5. Stijn Baert & Bas van der Klaauw & Gijsbert van Lomwel, 2018. "The effectiveness of medical and vocational interventions for reducing sick leave of self‐employed workers," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 139-152, February.
    6. Sonia OREFICCE & Climent Quintana-Domeque, 2021. "Gender inequality in COVID-19 times: evidence from UK prolific participants," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(2), pages 261-287, June.
    7. Per Engström & Per Johansson, 2012. "The medical doctors as gatekeepers in the sickness insurance?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(28), pages 3615-3625, October.
    8. Ana Tribin & Karen García-Rojas & Paula Herrera-Idarraga & Leonardo Fabio Morales & Natalia Ramirez-Bustamante, 2023. "Shecession: The Downfall of Colombian Women During the Covid-19 Pandemic," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 158-193, October.
    9. repec:hal:journl:hal-03627187 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Earle, Alison & Heymann, Jody, 2011. "Protecting the health of employees caring for family members with special health care needs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 68-78, July.
    11. Pons Rotger, Gabriel & Rosholm, Michael, 2020. "The Role of Beliefs in Long Sickness Absence: Experimental Evidence from a Psychological Intervention," IZA Discussion Papers 13582, IZA Network @ LISER.
    12. Jakob Alfitian & Dirk Sliwka & Timo Vogelsang, 2024. "When Bonuses Backfire: Evidence from the Workplace," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(9), pages 6395-6414, September.
    13. Nicolas R. Ziebarth & Martin Karlsson, 2014. "The Effects Of Expanding The Generosity Of The Statutory Sickness Insurance System," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 208-230, March.
    14. Blanchard, Pablo & Burdin, Gabriel & Dean, Andrés, 2025. "Property rights, sick pay and effort supply," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    15. Ayllón, Sara, 2022. "Online teaching and gender bias," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Kim, Amee & Vanheusden, Frederique J. & Rashid, Mamunur, 2025. "Factors affecting UK household financial risk-taking and their implications for consumption of financial investments," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    17. Duersch, Peter & Oechssler, Jörg & Vadovic, Radovan, 2012. "Sick pay provision in experimental labor markets," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 1-19.
    18. Fukai, Taiyo & Ikeda, Masato & Kawaguchi, Daiji & Yamaguchi, Shintaro, 2023. "COVID-19 and the employment gender gap in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    19. Gaute Torsvik & Kjell Vaage, 2014. "Gatekeeping versus Monitoring: Evidence from a Case with Extended Self-Reporting of Sickness Absence," CESifo Working Paper Series 5113, CESifo.
    20. Pouliakas, Konstantinos & Theodossiou, Ioannis, 2010. "An Inquiry Into The Theory, Causes And Consequences Of Monitoring Indicators Of Health And Safety At Work," SIRE Discussion Papers 2010-120, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    21. Larsson, Laura, 2004. "Harmonizing unemployment and sickness insurance: Why (not)?," Working Paper Series 2004:8, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • J28 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/glabode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.