IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diedps/82021.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Navigating through an external agenda and internal preferences: Ghana's national migration policy

Author

Listed:
  • Segadlo, Nadine

Abstract

In the context of international migration from African countries to Europe, the EU widely applies the strategy of curbing irregular migration. EU efforts focus on combating the root causes of migration and flight as well as achieving African compliance on return and re-admission. This approach ignores the interests of the countries of origin. It also undermines what countries of origin do to deal with migration in their own states. In West Africa, the regional organisation ECOWAS strongly promotes migration management, and introduced the 2008 ECOWAS Common Approach on Migration with guidelines for migration governance in the region. Ghana, as one of the first ECOWAS member states, adopted a National Migration Policy (NMP) in 2016. The country has a long history of migration, has experienced different migration trends and is affected by various streams of migration. As little is known about the country's policy responses to migration, this study investigates migration policy-making in Ghana. It specifically examines the case of the NMP for Ghana and aims at uncovering stakeholder involvement in the policy-making process as well as its determinants. Guided by an analytical framework derived from theoretical considerations of the advocacy coalition framework, the interconnection of institutions, actors and ideas and an extensive literature review, the study uses a qualitative approach. The results are based on 14 weeks of field research in Ghana in which 40 experts were interviewed. Together with an analysis of a plethora of secondary data the study finds that when deciding to get involved in the policy-making process for the NMP for Ghana, stakeholders tend to be led by their interests and the resources they possess, as these are what their power is based on. The research further reveals that the NMP does not primarily address a perceived problem related to migration within Ghana, that is to say the internal migration flows from deprived to less deprived areas. Rather it largely pursues the interests of the EU, who is the main financer of the policy, to foster migration control. The results of the study therefore suggest that in the policy formulation process for Ghana's NMP, internal interests were outweighed by the external agenda of the EU.

Suggested Citation

  • Segadlo, Nadine, 2021. "Navigating through an external agenda and internal preferences: Ghana's national migration policy," IDOS Discussion Papers 8/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:82021
    DOI: 10.23661/dp8.2021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/231448/1/1750175312.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23661/dp8.2021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Arthur, 1991. "Interregional migration of labor in Ghana, West Africa: Determinants, consequences and policy intervention," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 20(2), pages 89-103, December.
    2. Lindsay Whitfield, 2010. "The State Elite, s and Policy Implementation in Aid-dependent Ghana," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 721-737.
    3. Grimble, Robin & Wellard, Kate, 1997. "Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 173-193, October.
    4. Castillejo, Clare, 2019. "The influence of EU migration policy on regional free movement in the IGAD and ECOWAS regions," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2019, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Castillejo, Clare, 2017. "The European Union Trust Fund for Africa: what implications for future EU development policy?," Briefing Papers 5/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Government of India, 2017. "National Health Policy 2017," Working Papers id:11664, eSocialSciences.
    7. Jasmin Beverwijk & Leo Goedegebuure & Jeroen Huisman, 2008. "Policy change in nascent subsystems: Mozambican higher education policy 1993–2003," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 41(4), pages 357-377, December.
    8. Villamor, Grace B., 2006. "The rise of protected area policy in the Philippine forest policy: An analysis from the perspective of Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 162-178, November.
    9. Joseph Taabazuing & Frederick Armah & Jenna Dixon & Isaac Luginaah, 2012. "The relationship between traditional authorities and decentralized structures in Ghana: conflicting roles or a struggle for power and legitimacy," International Journal of Development and Conflict, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, vol. 2(3), pages 1250017-125.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stamm, Andreas & Strupat, Christoph & Hornidge, Anna-Katharina, 2021. "Global access to COVID-19 vaccines: Challenges in production, affordability, distribution and utilisation," IDOS Discussion Papers 19/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Lundsgaarde, Erik, 2021. "The EU-UNDP partnership and added value in EU development cooperation," IDOS Discussion Papers 20/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    3. Bante, Jana & Helmig, Felix & Prasad, Lara & Scheu, Lea Deborah & Seipel, Jean Christoph & Senkpiel, Helge & Geray, Markus & von Schiller, Armin & Sebudubudu, David & Ziaja, Sebastian, 2021. "E-government and democracy in Botswana: Observational and experimental evidence on the effects of e-government usage on political attitudes," IDOS Discussion Papers 16/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Auktor, Georgeta Vidican & Loewe, Markus, 2021. "Subsidy reforms in the Middle East and North Africa: Strategic options and their consequences for the social contract," IDOS Discussion Papers 12/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Domínguez, J. Carlos, 2021. "Identity and discourse within diverse international networks: The Managing Global Governance network seen through the lens of thematic oral history," IDOS Discussion Papers 14/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    2. Tajul Masron & Mduduzi Biyase & Talent Zwane & Thomas Udimal & Frederich Kirsten, 2023. "Ecological footprint and population health outcomes: an analysis of E7 countries," Economics Working Papers edwrg-07-2023, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, South Africa, revised 2023.
    3. Shawhan, Daniel L. & Picciano, Paul D., 2019. "Costs and benefits of saving unprofitable generators: A simulation case study for US coal and nuclear power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 383-400.
    4. Shu Yan & Lizi Pan & Yan Lu & Juan Chen & Ting Zhang & Dongzi Xu & Zhaolian Ouyang, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Drug Supply in China: A Bibliometric Analysis of Drug Reform Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Bozena Wielgoszewska & Alex Bryson & Monica Costa-Dias & Francesca Foliano & Heather Joshi & David Wilkinson, 2021. "Exploring the Reasons for Labour Market Gender Inequality a Year into the Covid-19 Pandemic: Evidence from the UK Cohort Studies," DoQSS Working Papers 21-23, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    6. Shi, Wunan & Wouters, Olivier J. & Liu, Gordon & Mossialos, Elias & Yang, Xiuyun, 2020. "Association between provincial income levels and drug prices in China over the period 2010–2017," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    7. Yu, Bing & Xu, Linyu, 2016. "Review of ecological compensation in hydropower development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 729-738.
    8. Anne Hardy & Leonie J. Pearson, 2016. "Determining Sustainable Tourism in Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Katie Adamek & Sarah Bardin & So O'Neil & Dara Lee Luca, "undated". "Accelerating Teen Pregnancy Prevention in Phillips County, Arkansas and Coahoma County, Mississippi," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 7fda86cbb1bf4303a84f466e8, Mathematica Policy Research.
    10. Schouten, Greetje & Leroy, Pieter & Glasbergen, Pieter, 2012. "On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: The Roundtables on Responsible Soy and Sustainable Palm Oil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 42-50.
    11. Raphael Hoerler & Fabian Haerri & Merja Hoppe, 2019. "New Solutions in Sustainable Commuting—The Attitudes and Experience of European Stakeholders and Experts in Switzerland," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Saint Ville, Arlette S. & Hickey, Gordon M. & Phillip, Leroy E., 2017. "How do stakeholder interactions influence national food security policy in the Caribbean? The case of Saint Lucia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 53-64.
    13. Han, Lu & Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias & Opsahl, Tore, 2018. "The social network of international health aid," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 67-74.
    14. Burieva Nigora Hasanovna, 2019. "Models of Financing and Organization of Health Care System-International Experience," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 5(5), pages 7-12, July.
    15. Carolina Cortes-Herrera & Graciela Artavia & Silvia Quiros-Fallas & Eduardo Calderon-Calvo & Astrid Leiva & Josue Vasquez-Flores & Fabio Granados-Chinchilla, 2023. "Analysis of Minerals in Foods: A Three-year Survey from Costa Rican Market Products," Journal of Food Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, January.
    16. Victoria S S Wong & Lauro Nathaniel Avalos & Michael L Callaham, 2019. "Industry payments to physician journal editors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-11, February.
    17. Jordi Ripollés & Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso, 2021. "African Asylum Seekers in Europe: The Interplay between Foreign Aid and Governance in Origin Countries," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 829-865, November.
    18. Ya-Ling Lin & Wen-Yi Chen & Shwn-Huey Shieh, 2020. "Age Structural Transitions and Copayment Policy Effectiveness: Evidence from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Kyeong-Rae Kim & Jae-Eun Park & So-Young Lim & Ho Kim & Il-Tae Jang & Kwang-Yeol Lee, 2020. "Effects of Nutrition on Osteoarthritis in Women Over the 50 Years: Using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) Data," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(7), pages 1-29, June.
    20. Oluyomi A. Osobajo & David Moore, 2017. "Who is Who? Identifying the Different Sub-groups of Secondary Stakeholders within a Community: A Case Study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Communities," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 188-209, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:82021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.