IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v263y2020ics0277953620304664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between provincial income levels and drug prices in China over the period 2010–2017

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Wunan
  • Wouters, Olivier J.
  • Liu, Gordon
  • Mossialos, Elias
  • Yang, Xiuyun

Abstract

In the past decade, the Chinese central government has made sweeping reforms to national pharmaceutical policies. However, provincial authorities have retained control over most drug procurement procedures, potentially leading to cross-province differences in drug prices. The objectives of this study were to (i) examine drug price trends in 31 Chinese provinces and municipalities between 2010 and 2017; (ii) evaluate the association between provincial income levels and drug prices over this period; and (iii) compare the results for Chinese state-owned, Chinese private, and multinational pharmaceutical firms. Using publicly available data on procurement prices of the drugs manufactured by the top 30 pharmaceutical firms in China (in terms of revenues), we ran a generalized country-product-dummy regression to compare drug prices across provinces over the study period. We conducted subgroup analyses to test for differences between types of firms. Between 2010 and 2017, drug prices decreased by an average of 23% across the country. The prices of drugs sold by multinational firms dropped by 32% over this period, while the prices of drugs sold by Chinese private firms declined by 28%. By contrast, the drug prices of state-owned firms went up by 11%. There were statistically significant positive associations between drug prices and provincial income levels for the full sample in 2010, 2011, and 2013. There were no significant associations in other years. Several low-income provinces paid higher procurement prices than some high-income provinces for identical medicines, especially in later study years. The lack of association between income levels and prices poses equity concerns and may place a heavier cost burden on the poor. It also suggests that China's pharmaceutical policies may be failing to balance the dual aims of drug affordability and incentives for innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Wunan & Wouters, Olivier J. & Liu, Gordon & Mossialos, Elias & Yang, Xiuyun, 2020. "Association between provincial income levels and drug prices in China over the period 2010–2017," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:263:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620304664
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953620304664
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malueg, David A. & Schwartz, Marius, 1994. "Parallel imports, demand dispersion, and international price discrimination," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3-4), pages 167-195, November.
    2. Panos Kanavos & Joan Costa-Font, 2005. "Pharmaceutical parallel trade in Europe: stakeholder and competition effects [‘First report (final) to the Committee on International Trade Law of the International Law Association on the subject o," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 20(44), pages 758-798.
    3. Erwin Diewert, 2010. "New Methodological Developments For The International Comparison Program," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 56(s1), pages 11-31, June.
    4. William Jack & Jean O. Lanjouw, 2005. "Financing Pharmaceutical Innovation: How Much Should Poor Countries Contribute?," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 19(1), pages 45-67.
    5. Robert Summers, 1973. "International Price Comparisons Based Upon Incomplete Data," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, March.
    6. D.S. Prasada Rao, 2004. "The Country-Product-Dummy Method: A Stochastic Approach to the Computation of Purchasing Power Parities in the ICP," CEPA Working Papers Series WP032004, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    7. Varian, Hal R, 1985. "Price Discrimination and Social Welfare," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(4), pages 870-875, September.
    8. Yunzhen He & Guanshen Dou & Qiaoyun Huang & Xinyu Zhang & Yingfeng Ye & Mengcen Qian & Xiaohua Ying, 2018. "Does the leading pharmaceutical reform in China really solve the issue of overly expensive healthcare services? Evidence from an empirical study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Patricia M. Danzon & Andrew W. Mulcahy & Adrian K. Towse, 2015. "Pharmaceutical Pricing in Emerging Markets: Effects of Income, Competition, and Procurement," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 238-252, February.
    10. Patricia Danzon, 1997. "Price Discrimination for Pharmaceuticals: Welfare Effects in the US and the EU," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 301-322.
    11. Jing Wu & Judy Xu & Gordon Liu & Jiuhong Wu, 2014. "Pharmaceutical Pricing: An Empirical Study of Market Competition in Chinese Hospitals," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 293-303, March.
    12. Yan Song & Ying Bian & Tianmin Zhen, 2018. "Making medicines more accessible in China: An empirical study investigating the early progress of essential medicine system," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, August.
    13. Adrian Towse & Michele Pistollato & Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz & Zeba Khan & Satyin Kaura & Louis Garrison, 2015. "European Union Pharmaceutical Markets: A Case for Differential Pricing?," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 263-275, July.
    14. Government of India, 2017. "National Health Policy 2017," Working Papers id:11664, eSocialSciences.
    15. Wouters, Olivier J. & Sandberg, Dale M. & Pillay, Anban & Kanavos, Panos G., 2019. "The impact of pharmaceutical tendering on prices and market concentration in South Africa over a 14-year period," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 362-370.
    16. Patricia M. Danzon, 2018. "Differential Pricing of Pharmaceuticals: Theory, Evidence and Emerging Issues," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 36(12), pages 1395-1405, December.
    17. Y. Wang, 2006. "Price competition in the chinese pharmaceutical market," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 119-129, June.
    18. Hu, Jia & Mossialos, Elias, 2016. "Pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement in China: When the whole is less than the sum of its parts," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(5), pages 519-534.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adrian Towse & Michele Pistollato & Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz & Zeba Khan & Satyin Kaura & Louis Garrison, 2015. "European Union Pharmaceutical Markets: A Case for Differential Pricing?," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 263-275, July.
    2. Patricia Danzon & Adrian Towse & Jorge Mestre‐Ferrandiz, 2015. "Value‐Based Differential Pricing: Efficient Prices for Drugs in a Global Context," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(3), pages 294-301, March.
    3. Patricia M. Danzon & Eric L. Keuffel, 2014. "Regulation of the Pharmaceutical-Biotechnology Industry," NBER Chapters, in: Economic Regulation and Its Reform: What Have We Learned?, pages 407-484, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Braouezec, Yann, 2012. "Customer-class pricing, parallel trade and the optimal number of market segments," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 605-614.
    5. Sebastian Weinand, 2022. "Measuring spatial price differentials at the basic heading level: a comparison of stochastic index number methods," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(1), pages 117-143, March.
    6. Patricia M. Danzon & Andrew W. Mulcahy & Adrian K. Towse, 2015. "Pharmaceutical Pricing in Emerging Markets: Effects of Income, Competition, and Procurement," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 238-252, February.
    7. Ebenezer Tetteh, 2009. "Implementing differential pricing for essential medicines via country-specific bilateral negotiated discounts," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 71-89, June.
    8. Fabio Pammolli & Armando Rungi, 2016. "Access to Medicines and European Market Integration," Working Papers 01/2016, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, revised Jan 2016.
    9. Nikolaos Zevgolis & Panagiotis Fotis, 2014. "Prohibition of parallel imports as a vertical restraint: per se approach or a misunderstanding?," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 317-342, October.
    10. Robert J. Hill & Iqbal A. Syed, 2015. "Improving International Comparisons of Prices at Basic Heading Level: An Application to the Asia-Pacific Region," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 61(3), pages 515-539, September.
    11. Mahlich Jörg & Sindern Jörn & Suppliet Moritz, 2015. "Vergleichbarkeit internationaler Arzneimittelpreise," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 164-172, June.
    12. Bennato, Anna Rita & Valletti, Tommaso, 2014. "Pharmaceutical innovation and parallel trade," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 83-92.
    13. Drusilla K. Brown & George Norman, 2004. "Optimal Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Humanitarian Assistance during and International Health Emergency," Discussion Papers Series, Department of Economics, Tufts University 0416, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
    14. Shu Yan & Lizi Pan & Yan Lu & Juan Chen & Ting Zhang & Dongzi Xu & Zhaolian Ouyang, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Drug Supply in China: A Bibliometric Analysis of Drug Reform Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Einer Elhauge & Barry Nalebuff, 2017. "The Welfare Effects of Metering Ties," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 33(1), pages 68-104.
    16. Alicia Gómez-Tello & Alfonso Díez-Minguela & Julio Martinez-Galarraga & Daniel A. Tirado, 2019. "Regional prices in early twentieth-century Spain: a country-product-dummy approach," Cliometrica, Springer;Cliometric Society (Association Francaise de Cliométrie), vol. 13(2), pages 245-276, May.
    17. Erwin Diewert, 2010. "New Methodological Developments For The International Comparison Program," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 56(s1), pages 11-31, June.
    18. Brekke, Kurt R. & Holmås, Tor Helge & Straume, Odd Rune, 2015. "Price regulation and parallel imports of pharmaceuticals," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 92-105.
    19. Yann Braouezec, 2013. "The Welfare Effects of Regulating the Number of Market Segments," Working Papers 2013-ECO-11, IESEG School of Management.
    20. Robert J. Hill & Iqbal A. Syed, 2012. "Accounting for Unrepresentative Products and Urban-Rural Price Differences in International Comparisons of Real Income: An Application to the Asia-Pacific Region," Graz Economics Papers 2012-07, University of Graz, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:263:y:2020:i:c:s0277953620304664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.