``The Economics of Agency Law and Contract Formation''
This article addresses issues that arise in agency law when agents make contracts on behalf of principals. The main issue is whether the principal should be bound when the agent makes a contract with some third party on his behalf which the principal would immediately wish to disavow. The resulting tradeoffs resemble those in tort law, so the least-cost-avoider principle is useful for deciding when contracts are valid and may be the underlying logic behind a number of different legal doctrines applied to agency cases. In particular, an efficiency explanation can be found for the undisclosed principal rule, which says that the principal is generally bound even when the third party is unaware that the agent is acting as an agent for him.
|Date of creation:||14 Jun 1995|
|Note:||An 82KB LaTeX file. A postscript file is available on request from Erasmuse@Indiana.edu.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://econwpa.repec.org|
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Kathryn E. Spier, 1992. "Incomplete Contracts and Signalling," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 23(3), pages 432-443, Autumn.
- Rasmusen, Eric & Ayres, Ian, 1993.
"Mutual and Unilateral Mistake in Contract Law,"
The Journal of Legal Studies,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 309-343, June.
- Rasmusen, E., 1992. "Mutual and Unilateral Mistake in Contract Law," Papers 92-022, Indiana - Center for Econometric Model Research.
- Bengt Holmstrom, 1982. "Moral Hazard in Teams," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 13(2), pages 324-340, Autumn.