IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Was the Russian Financial Crisis Contagious?

  • Ulugbek Olimov

    (Center for Economic Research)

Using daily data from the stock markets of nine European transition economies, this paper tests for stock market contagion during the 1998 Russian financial crisis by utilizing both univariate and bivariate correlation analysis. The results of the linear model indicate that there is no evidence of contagion, while the bivariate analysis, based on the newly developed Corsetti-Pericoli-Sbracia (CPS) test, reveals the presence of structural breaks between the Russian and Czech stock markets. Moreover, crisis-post crisis comparison analysis shows that contagion occurred after the Russian crisis. This paper proposes to label such an effect as a 'reverse' contagion. The results of Monte Carlo experiments show that the linear model performs poorly under the null hypothesis of interdependence and systematically under-rejects in the case of small test sizes. In sum, at least for the examined parameter values, it appears that the CPS test has less size distortion than the linear model.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://128.118.178.162/eps/if/papers/0409/0409003.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by EconWPA in its series International Finance with number 0409003.

as
in new window

Length: 17 pages
Date of creation: 08 Sep 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpif:0409003
Note: Type of Document - pdf; pages: 17
Contact details of provider: Web page: http://128.118.178.162

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpif:0409003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (EconWPA)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.