IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uto/dipeco/202604.html

Who Is to Blame (or Praise)? Information, Responsibility Attribution, and Service Quality in Multilevel Government

Author

Abstract

In multilevel systems, decentralization can improve accountability only if citizens can identify which level of government is responsible for public services. We conduct a survey experiment with a nationally representative sample of 5,000 Italian citizens to study responsibility attribution and service quality perceptions. We find widespread misattribution of responsibility across local, regional, and central government, especially where responsibilities overlap. We then randomly provide a subset of respondents with correct information about the responsible level of government. When this feedback shifts perceived responsibility toward a politically aligned government, respondents report higher service quality. Providing feedback to respondents who answered correctly also increases reported service quality, especially for the non-aligned, suggesting a confirmation effect. Additional evidence from the order manipulation suggests that selective quality evaluation may represent the stronger bias. These findings highlight the importance of institutional clarity and the politically motivated quality assessments that can arise when responsibility is poorly understood.

Suggested Citation

  • Capezzone, Tommaso & Conzo, Pierluigi & Sas, Willem & Vorobyev, Dmitriy & Zotti, Roberto, 2026. "Who Is to Blame (or Praise)? Information, Responsibility Attribution, and Service Quality in Multilevel Government," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 202604, University of Turin.
  • Handle: RePEc:uto:dipeco:202604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.est.unito.it/do/home.pl/Download?doc=/allegati/wp2026dip/wp_04_2026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uto:dipeco:202604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Laura Ballestra or Cinzia Carlevaris (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/detorit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.