IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucl/cepeob/33.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What are the evidence-based ways to equalise opportunities?

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Outhwaite

    (UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities)

  • Lindsey Macmillan

    (UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities)

Abstract

Britain is not a socially mobile country. 50% of the variation in earnings can be explained by the circumstances in which individuals grew up. This is higher than in most other developed countries (Corak, 2013; Jerrim and Macmillan, 2015). This is a waste of talent: not fully harnessing the talent of individuals from all backgrounds hampers productivity and economic growth (Hsieh et al., 2019). The UK Government's Opportunities Mission seeks to address this, underpinned by the principle that where you end up in life should not be determined by your parents' financial circumstances. This can be measured using the link between relative incomes across generations - or, more specifically, intergenerational income mobility. This is, therefore, focused on the concept of equality of opportunities; the idea that by equalising young people's life chances, the link between their parental circumstances in childhood and their adult outcomes can be weakened for children from all backgrounds. So, what is the evidence base for this focus?

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Outhwaite & Lindsey Macmillan, 2025. "What are the evidence-based ways to equalise opportunities?," CEPEO Briefing Note Series 33, UCL Centre for Education Policy and Equalising Opportunities, revised May 2025.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucl:cepeob:33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-cepeo.ucl.ac.uk/cepeob/cepeobn33.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    equalising opportunities;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucl:cepeob:33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Anders (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/epucluk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.