IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20260019.html

Tier count in traffic-light eco-labels

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Ansink

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

  • Frederic Klapwijk

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Abstract

We study whether the number of tiers in a traffic-light eco-label affects consumer welfare. We develop a model in which consumers observe price, quality, and the label tier, but infer a product's environmental quality ("greenness'") imperfectly. In that setting, adding a tier can improve the information content of the label while still lowering welfare near newly created cutoffs. We then use a discrete choice experiment on trash bags with two-tier and three-tier traffic-light labels to test the behavioral ingredients of the model. Estimated treatment effects in the choice experiment show that adding a middle tier makes respondents more likely to choose the highest label tier, increases price sensitivity, and reduces the use of price as a cue for greenness. We interpret these results as evidence that tier count changes both the choice response to the highest label tier and price-based inference. A structural interpretation also yields a positive estimate of the price-proxy parameter, and the three-tier choice data imply a positive but modest separation between the yellow and green tiers under transparent normalizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Ansink & Frederic Klapwijk, 2026. "Tier count in traffic-light eco-labels," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 26-019/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20260019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/26019.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Marette & L. Nabec & F. Durieux, 2019. "Improving Nutritional Quality of Consumers’ Food Purchases With Traffic-Lights Labels: An Experimental Analysis," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 377-395, September.
    2. Sofia B. Villas‐Boas & Kristin Kiesel & Joshua P. Berning & Hayley H. Chouinard & Jill J. McCluskey, 2020. "Consumer and Strategic Firm Response to Nutrition Shelf Labels," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(2), pages 458-479, March.
    3. Hunt Allcott & Dmitry Taubinsky, 2015. "Evaluating Behaviorally Motivated Policy: Experimental Evidence from the Lightbulb Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(8), pages 2501-2538, August.
    4. Mika Kortelainen & Jibonayan Raychaudhuri & Beatrice Roussillon, 2016. "Effects Of Carbon Reduction Labels: Evidence From Scanner Data," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(2), pages 1167-1187, April.
    5. Julia Cage & Dorothée Rouzet, 2015. "Improving “National Brands”: Reputation for Quality and Export Promotion Strategies," SciencePo Working papers hal-01167909, HAL.
    6. Charles Mason, 2011. "Eco-Labeling and Market Equilibria with Noisy Certification Tests," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(4), pages 537-560, April.
    7. Rodolfo Sejas-Portillo & Mirko Moro & Till Stowasser, 2025. "The Simpler the Better? Threshold Effects of Energy Labels on Property Prices and Energy Efficiency Investments," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 41-89, January.
    8. Laurent Muller & Anne Lacroix & Bernard Ruffieux, 2019. "Environmental Labelling and Consumption Changes: A Food Choice Experiment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(3), pages 871-897, July.
    9. Amacher, Gregory S. & Koskela, Erkki & Ollikainen, Markku, 2004. "Environmental quality competition and eco-labeling," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 284-306, March.
    10. Cagé, Julia & Rouzet, Dorothée, 2015. "Improving “national brands”: Reputation for quality and export promotion strategies," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 274-290.
    11. Brenna Ellison & Jayson L. Lusk & David Davis, 2014. "The Impact Of Restaurant Calorie Labels On Food Choice: Results From A Field Experiment," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 52(2), pages 666-681, April.
    12. Tongzhe Li & Maik Kecinski & Kent D. Messer, 2018. "Behavioural responses to science-based eco-labelling: gold, silver, or bronze," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(39), pages 4250-4263, August.
    13. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2si2or72bc8ed899298h75877i is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Roth, Katharina P. & Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, 2009. "Advancing the country image construct," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 726-740, July.
    15. Lusk Jayson L. & Marette Stéphan, 2012. "Can Labeling and Information Policies Harm Consumers?," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Robert J. Johnston & Kevin J. Boyle & Wiktor (Vic) Adamowicz & Jeff Bennett & Roy Brouwer & Trudy Ann Cameron & W. Michael Hanemann & Nick Hanley & Mandy Ryan & Riccardo Scarpa & Roger Tourangeau & Ch, 2017. "Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(2), pages 319-405.
    17. Costanigro, Marco & Scozzafava, Gabriele & Casini, Leonardo, 2019. "Vertical differentiation via multi-tier geographical indications and the consumer perception of quality: The case of Chianti wines," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 246-259.
    18. Nadar, Emre & Ertürk, Mine Su, 2021. "Eco-design of eco-labels with coarse grades," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Hallstein, Eric & Villas-Boas, Sofia B., 2013. "Can household consumers save the wild fish? Lessons from a sustainable seafood advisory," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 52-71.
    20. Fredrik Carlsson & Mitesh Kataria & Elina Lampi & Erik Nyberg & Thomas Sterner, 2022. "Red, yellow, or green? Do consumers’ choices of food products depend on the label design?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(5), pages 1005-1026.
    21. Carolyn Fischer & Thomas P. Lyon, 2014. "Competing Environmental Labels," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 692-716, September.
    22. Carolyn Fischer & Thomas P. Lyon, 2019. "A Theory of Multitier Ecolabel Competition," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(3), pages 461-501.
    23. K. Roth & A. Diamantopoulos, 2009. "Advancing the country image construct," Post-Print hal-00787417, HAL.
    24. Larissa Drescher & Jutta Roosen & Stephan Marette, 2014. "The effects of traffic light labels and involvement on consumer choices for food and financial products," Post-Print hal-01173022, HAL.
    25. Li, Yuanhao & van 't Veld, Klaas, 2015. "Green, greener, greenest: Eco-label gradation and competition," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 164-176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cole, Matthew T. & Doremus, Jacqueline M. & Hamilton, Stephen F., 2021. "Import restrictions by eco-certification: Quantity effects on tropical timber production," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Frank Wijen & Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2019. "Controversy Over Voluntary Environmental Standards: A Socioeconomic Analysis of the Marine Stewardship Council," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02071504, HAL.
    3. Li, Yi, 2020. "Competing eco-labels and product market competition," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Yokessa, Maïmouna & Marette, Stéphan, 2019. "A Review of Eco-labels and their Economic Impact," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 13(1-2), pages 119-163, April.
    5. Carattini, Stefano & Dvorak, Fabian & Logar, Ivana & Ozdemir-Oluk, Begum, 2025. "Demand for Carbon-Neutral Products," CEPR Discussion Papers 20843, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    6. Matthew T. Cole & Jacqueline Doremus & Stephen Hamilton, 2019. "Market Segmentation by Certification: Quantity effects on tropical timber production," Working Papers 1902, California Polytechnic State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Haitao CHENG & Jota ISHIKAWA & Nori TARUI, 2025. "Green Consumption and Corporate Environmental Responsibility in North-South Trade," Discussion papers 25043, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    8. Alexander J. Stein & Marcelo Lima, 2022. "Sustainable food labelling: considerations for policy-makers," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 103(2), pages 143-160, June.
    9. Heidelmeier, Lisa & Sahm, Marco, 2025. "Environmental awards in a duopoly with green consumers," BERG Working Paper Series 207, Bamberg University, Bamberg Economic Research Group.
    10. Cecilia Castaldo & Matilde Giaccherini & Giacomo Pallante & Alessandro Palma, 2024. "Unveiling Shades of Green Food beyond Labels. Evidence from an Online Experiment to Climate Adaptation," CESifo Working Paper Series 11161, CESifo.
    11. Hend Ghazzai & R Lahmandi-Ayed, 2018. "Ecolabels: Is More Information Better?," Working Papers hal-01877934, HAL.
    12. Poret, Sylvaine, 2019. "Label wars: Competition among NGOs as sustainability standard setters," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1-18.
    13. Caroline Orset & Marco Monnier, 2020. "How do lobbies and NGOs try to influence dietary behaviour?," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 47-66, October.
    14. Bonneton, Nicolas, 2025. "The market for ethical goods," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    15. Doremus, Jacqueline, 2020. "How does eco-label competition affect environmental benefits? The case of Central Africa's forests," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    16. Li, Yuanhao & van 't Veld, Klaas, 2015. "Green, greener, greenest: Eco-label gradation and competition," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 164-176.
    17. Anthony Heyes & Sandeep Kapur & Peter W. Kennedy & Steve Martin & John W. Maxwell, 2020. "But What Does It Mean? Competition between Products Carrying Alternative Green Labels When Consumers Are Active Acquirers of Information," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 7(2), pages 243-277.
    18. Philippe Mahenc, 2017. "Honest versus Misleading Certification," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 454-483, June.
    19. Fritz, Qi Gao, 2023. "Label to match - Firms’ signaling decisions when not everyone cares," SocArXiv ay8rq, Center for Open Science.
    20. Thomas de Haan & Magnus Våge Knutsen, 2026. "Product Ratings and Externalities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(5), pages 4282-4297, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • L15 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Information and Product Quality
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20260019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.