IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tcb/econot/2603.html

Inter-Industry Labor Reallocation in Türkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Barbaros Eris
  • Sureyya Guder Kosgeroglu
  • Zeynep Yilmaz

Abstract

[EN] This study examines patterns of inter-industry worker mobility in Türkiye using a structural gravity model framework. The study focuses on two key dimensions of mobility frictions: “Task Distance”, which measures the dissimilarity in skill requirements across industries, and “Transaction Index”, which captures the intensity of input–output relationships between sectors. Leveraging administrative matched employer-employee data from the Social Security Institution and firm-level trade data from the Revenue Administration, bilateral worker flows across industries between 2014 and 2023 are analyzed. Our results show that worker transitions are more likely to occur between industries with similar task structures and stronger transactional ties. In contrast, sector-specific performance indicators such as earning levels and job creation or destruction rates contribute only marginally to explaining worker flows. Only job creation in destination industries and job destruction in source industries exhibit significant effects. These findings underscore the importance of structural compatibility between industries in shaping worker mobility, and present significant implications for the design of labor adjustment programs in the process of sectoral transformation. [TR] Bu calisma, Turkiye’de sektorler arasi isgucu hareketliligi dinamiklerini yapisal bir cekim modeli cercevesinde incelemektedir. Calisma isgucu gecislerinin iki temel boyutu uzerinde odaklanmaktadir: sektorler arasi beceri gereksinimi farkliliklarini olcen "Gorev Mesafesi" ve sektorler arasi girdi-cikti iliskilerinin yogunlugunu yansitan "Ticaret Endeksi". Sosyal Guvenlik Kurumunun isveren–calisan eslestirilmis idari verileri ile Gelir Idaresi Baskanliginin firma duzeyindeki ticaret verilerini kullanarak, 2014–2023 doneminde sektor ciftleri arasindaki isgucu akislari analiz edilmektedir. Sonuclarimiz, en benzer gorev yapilarina sahip olmasi ve daha guclu ticari baglantilara sahip sektorler arasinda isgucu gecislerinin meydana gelme olasiliginin daha yuksek oldugunu gostermektedir. Buna karsilik, kazanc seviyeleri ya da is yaratma ve yok etme oranlari gibi sektore ozgu performans gostergelerinin aciklayici gucu sinirlidir. Yalnizca hedef sektorlerde is yaratma ve kaynak sektorlerdeki is yok etme anlamli etkiler gostermektedir. Bu bulgular, sektorler arasi isgucu hareketliligini sekillendirmede yapisal uyumun oneminin altini cizmekte ve sektorel donusum surecinde isgucu uyum programlarinin tasarimi acisindan onemli cikarimlar sunmaktadir.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbaros Eris & Sureyya Guder Kosgeroglu & Zeynep Yilmaz, 2026. "Inter-Industry Labor Reallocation in Türkiye," CBT Research Notes in Economics 2603, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
  • Handle: RePEc:tcb:econot:2603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/05959b1d-99c5-4e2e-8e32-f10102c007b7/en2603.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-05959b1d-99c5-4e2e-8e32-f10102c007b7-pR2ztnA
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacob A. Mincer, 1974. "The Human Capital Earnings Function," NBER Chapters, in: Schooling, Experience, and Earnings, pages 83-96, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
    3. Jovanovic, Boyan, 1979. "Job Matching and the Theory of Turnover," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 87(5), pages 972-990, October.
    4. Neffke, Frank M.H. & Otto, Anne & Weyh, Antje, 2017. "Inter-industry labor flows," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 275-292.
    5. Kondo, Ayako & Naganuma, Saori, 2015. "Inter-industry labor reallocation and task distance," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 127-147.
    6. Christina Gathmann & Uta Schönberg, 2010. "How General Is Human Capital? A Task-Based Approach," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 28(1), pages 1-49, January.
    7. Acemoglu, Daron & Autor, David, 2011. "Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 12, pages 1043-1171, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicole Bosch & Bas ter Weel, 2013. "Labour-market outcomes of older workers in the Netherlands: Measuring job prospects using the occupational age structure," CPB Discussion Paper 234.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    2. Nicole Bosch & Bas ter Weel, 2013. "Labour-Market Outcomes of Older Workers in the Netherlands: Measuring Job Prospects Using the Occupational Age Structure," De Economist, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 199-218, June.
    3. Carl Sanders & Christopher Taber, 2012. "Life-Cycle Wage Growth and Heterogeneous Human Capital," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 4(1), pages 399-425, July.
    4. Ljubica Nedelkoska & Frank Neffke, 2019. "Skill Mismatch and Skill Transferability: Review of Concepts and Measurements," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1921, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jun 2019.
    5. Ljubica Nedelkoska & Dario Diodato & Frank Neffke, 2018. "Is Our Human Capital General Enough to Withstand the Current Wave of Technological Change?," Growth Lab Working Papers 115, Harvard's Growth Lab.
    6. Kondo, Ayako & Naganuma, Saori, 2015. "Inter-industry labor reallocation and task distance," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 127-147.
    7. Catherine Laffineur & Charlie Joyez & Raja Kali, 2023. "Occupational Coherence and the Geography of Unemployment," GREDEG Working Papers 2023-20, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France, revised Jul 2025.
    8. Nicole Bosch & Bas ter Weel, 2013. "Labour-market outcomes of older workers in the Netherlands: Measuring job prospects using the occupational age structure," CPB Discussion Paper 234, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    9. Battisti, Michele & Gatto, Massimo Del & Parmeter, Christopher F., 2022. "Skill-biased technical change and labor market inefficiency," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. David Deming & Lisa B. Kahn, 2018. "Skill Requirements across Firms and Labor Markets: Evidence from Job Postings for Professionals," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(S1), pages 337-369.
    11. Speer, Jamin D., 2016. "How bad is occupational coding error? A task-based approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 166-168.
    12. Theodore Koutmeridis, 2013. "The Market for "Rough Diamonds": Information, Finance and Wage Inequality," CDMA Working Paper Series 201307, Centre for Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis, revised 14 Oct 2013.
    13. Pedros Silos & Eric Smith, 2015. "Human Capital Portfolios," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 18(3), pages 635-652, July.
    14. Virginia Minni, 2023. "Making the invisible hand visible: Managers and the allocation of workers to jobs," STICERD - Economic Organisation and Public Policy Discussion Papers Series 72, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    15. Zsolt Csáfordi & László Lőrincz & Balázs Lengyel & Károly Miklós Kiss, 2020. "Productivity spillovers through labor flows: productivity gap, multinational experience and industry relatedness," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 86-121, February.
    16. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2vteelu0n785l82j764n6ul273 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Ross, Matthew B., 2017. "Routine-biased technical change: Panel evidence of task orientation and wage effects," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 198-214.
    18. Ariu, Andrea & Müller, Tobias & Nguyen, Tuan, 2023. "Immigration and the Slope of the Labor Demand Curve: The Role of Firm Heterogeneity in a Model of Regional Labor Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 18091, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    19. Simon Eisele & Martin R. Schneider, 2020. "What Do Unions Do to Work Design? Computer Use, Union Presence, and Tayloristic Jobs in Britain," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 604-626, October.
    20. Lex Borghans & Bas Ter Weel & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2014. "People Skills and the Labor-Market Outcomes of Underrepresented Groups," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 67(2), pages 287-334, April.
    21. Andrew Yizhou Liu, 2026. "The EITC and occupational mobility," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 1-25, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tcb:econot:2603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tcmgvtr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.