IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tcb/econot/2505.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Eight Observations on Relationship Lending in Türkiye

Author

Listed:
  • Ayse Karasoy
  • Gokce Karasoy Can
  • Emine Ozgu Ozen

Abstract

[EN]This note aims to provide an overview of “relationship lending” (RL) which represents the beneficial alliance between the lender and the borrower in terms of available funds and affordable rates for Türkiye. The examination of the data provides following findings: 1) When the relationship is measured by loan share (the weight of the bank in the overall debt of the firm), it is strongly associated with loans having longer maturities and lower interest rates. 2) These observations are even stronger for small and medium-sized firms. 3) The correlation between loan share with interest rates and maturity changes over time. 4) RL has a more pronounced effect on interest rates and maturities when the bank is the main lender. 5) The duration (length of the relationship between bank and the firm) as an RL indicator works in the same direction as loan share. 6) Duration is also strongly associated with larger amounts of new loans. 7) The number of lenders matters. A firm’s engagement with multiple banks might signal its riskiness. Having more lenders results in higher interest rates and shorter loan maturities. 8) Securing multiple new loans from the same bank within a quarter often leads to slightly higher interest rates and shorter maturities. These observations demonstrate the existence of the phenomenon of RL within the Turkish banking sector, thereby affording borrowers with strong relations access to more favorable credit conditions. The results are mostly in line with the literature on relationship lending and likely to motivate further research on credit markets and transmission channels. [TR]Bu not, Turkiye icin borc veren ve borc alan arasindaki faydali ittifak anlamina gelen "iliski bankaciligi" (iB) kavramina genel bir bakis saglamayi amaclamaktadir. Gozlemler soyle ozetlenebilir: 1) “guclu iliski”, kredi payi (bankanin firmanin toplam borcu icindeki agirligi) ile olculdugunde, daha guclu iliskiler daha uzun vadeler ve daha dusuk faiz oranlari ile dogru orantilidir. 2) Bu gozlemler kucuk ve orta olcekli firmalar icin daha da gucludur. 3) Bunlar arasindaki (kredi payi ile faiz oranlari ve vade) korelasyon zaman icinde degismektedir. 4) iliski bankaciligi, bankanin ana borc veren oldugu durumlarda faiz oranlari ve vadeler uzerinde daha belirgin bir etkiye sahiptir. 5) Bir iliski gostergesi olarak sure (banka ile firma arasindaki iliskinin uzunlugu) degiskeni, kredi payi ile benzer yonde calismaktadir. 6) Ayrica sure, daha yuksek tutarli yeni krediler ile guclu sekilde iliskilidir. 7) Kredi saglayan banka sayisi onemlidir. Birden fazla banka ile kredi iliskisine girmesi, firmalarin kredi riskliligine isaret edebilir. Daha fazla banka ile calismak daha yuksek faiz oranlari ve daha kisa kredi vadeleri ile sonuclanmaktadir. 8) Bir ceyrek icinde ayni bankadan birden fazla yeni kredi sozlesmesi daha yuksek faiz orani ve daha kisa vadeler ile dogru orantilidir. Bu gozlemler, Turk bankacilik sektorunde IB olgusunun varligini gostermekte ve boylece guclu iliskilere sahip firmalarin daha uygun kredi kosullarina erisim sagladiklarini gostermektedir. Bu gozlemler cogunlukla iliski bankaciligi literaturu ile uyumludur. Bulgularin kredi piyasalari ve aktarim kanallarina iliskin pek cok arastirmayi motive edecegi degerlendirilmektedir.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayse Karasoy & Gokce Karasoy Can & Emine Ozgu Ozen, 2025. "Eight Observations on Relationship Lending in Türkiye," CBT Research Notes in Economics 2505, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
    • Handle: RePEc:tcb:econot:2505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/4055753d-a5aa-4d7e-addc-413ca723a8ad/en202505.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-4055753d-a5aa-4d7e-addc-413ca723a8ad-pk3be.y
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allen N. Berger & Lawrence G. Goldberg & Lawrence J. White, 2001. "The Effects of Dynamic Changes in Bank Competition on the Supply of Small Business Credit," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 5(1-2), pages 115-139.
    2. Allen N. Berger & Gregory F. Udell, 2002. "Small Business Credit Availability and Relationship Lending: The Importance of Bank Organisational Structure," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(477), pages 32-53, February.
    3. Martins, Theo Cotrim & Schiozer, Rafael & Linardi, Fernando de Menezes, 2023. "The information content from lending relationships across the supply chain," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    4. Puri, Manju & Rocholl, Jörg & Steffen, Sascha, 2011. "Global retail lending in the aftermath of the US financial crisis: Distinguishing between supply and demand effects," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(3), pages 556-578, June.
    5. Berger, A.N. & Goldberg, L.G. & White, L.J., 2001. "The Effects of Dynamic Change in Bank Competition on the Supply of Small Business Credit," New York University, Leonard N. Stern School Finance Department Working Paper Seires 01-07, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business-.
    6. Mitchell A. Petersen & Raghuram G. Rajan, 1995. "The Effect of Credit Market Competition on Lending Relationships," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 407-443.
    7. Beck, Thorsten & Degryse, Hans & De Haas, Ralph & van Horen, Neeltje, 2018. "When arm's length is too far: Relationship banking over the credit cycle," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 174-196.
    8. Theo Cotrim Martins & Rafael Schiozer & Fernando de Menezes Linardi, 2023. "The Information Content from Lending Relationships Across the Supply Chain," Working Papers Series 577, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department.
    9. Petersen, Mitchell A & Rajan, Raghuram G, 1994. "The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 49(1), pages 3-37, March.
    10. Christophe CAHN & Mattia GIROTTI & Federica SALVADÈ, 2020. "The informational value of credit ratings in the bank/firm relationship [La valeur informative de la cote de crédit dans la relation banque/entreprise]," Bulletin de la Banque de France, Banque de France, issue 227.
    11. Ongena, Steven & Smith, David C., 2000. "What Determines the Number of Bank Relationships? Cross-Country Evidence," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 26-56, January.
    12. Hachem, Kinda, 2011. "Relationship lending and the transmission of monetary policy," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 590-600.
    13. Ufuk Akcigit & Unal Seven & Ibrahim Yarba & Fatih Yilmaz, 2021. "Firm-Level Impact of Credit Guarantees: Evidence from Turkish Credit Guarantee Fund," Working Papers 2110, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
    14. Berger, Allen N & Udell, Gregory F, 1992. "Some Evidence on the Empirical Significance of Credit Rationing," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 100(5), pages 1047-1077, October.
    15. Berger, Allen N & Udell, Gregory F, 1995. "Relationship Lending and Lines of Credit in Small Firm Finance," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 68(3), pages 351-381, July.
    16. Elyasiani, Elyas & Goldberg, Lawrence G., 2004. "Relationship lending: a survey of the literature," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 315-330.
    17. Enrico Sette & Giorgio Gobbi, 2015. "Relationship Lending During A Financial Crisis," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 13(3), pages 453-481, June.
    18. Abhijit Banerjee & Emily Breza & Arun G Chandrasekhar & Esther Duflo & Matthew O Jackson & Cynthia Kinnan, 2024. "Changes in Social Network Structure in Response to Exposure to Formal Credit Markets," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(3), pages 1331-1372.
    19. Boot, Arnoud W. A., 2000. "Relationship Banking: What Do We Know?," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 7-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doris Neuberger & Solvig Räthke, 2009. "Microenterprises and multiple bank relationships: The case of professionals," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 207-229, February.
    2. Tassel, Eric Van, 2006. "Relationship lending under asymmetric information: A case of blocked entry," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 915-929, September.
    3. Jalal Akhavein & Lawrence Goldberg & Lawrence White, 2004. "Small Banks, Small Business, and Relationships: An Empirical Study of Lending to Small Farms," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 26(3), pages 245-261, December.
    4. Gajewski, Krzysztof & Pawłowska, Małgorzata & Rogowski, Wojciech, 2012. "Relacje firm z bankami w Polsce w świetle danych ze sprawozdawczości bankowej [Bank-firm relationships in Poland in the light of data from bank reporting]," MPRA Paper 42544, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 29 Oct 2012.
    5. Beck, Thorsten & Ongena, Steven & Şendeniz-Yüncü, İlkay, 2019. "Keep walking? Geographical proximity, religion, and relationship banking," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 49-68.
    6. Eugene Kang & Asghar Zardkoohi & Ramona Paetzold & Donald Fraser, 2013. "Relationship banking and escalating commitments to bad loans," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 899-910, May.
    7. Ergungor, O. Emre, 2005. "The profitability of bank-borrower relationships," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 485-512, October.
    8. Berger, Allen N. & Klapper, Leora F. & Udell, Gregory F., 2001. "The ability of banks to lend to informationally opaque small businesses," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(12), pages 2127-2167, December.
    9. Beck, Thorsten & Degryse, Hans & De Haas, Ralph & van Horen, Neeltje, 2018. "When arm's length is too far: Relationship banking over the credit cycle," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 174-196.
    10. David P. Ely & Kenneth J. Robinson, 2004. "The impact of banks' expanded securities powers on small‐business lending," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1-2), pages 79-102.
    11. Banerjee, Ryan N. & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Sette, Enrico, 2021. "The real effects of relationship lending✰," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    12. Ryan Banerjee & Enrico Sette & Leonardo Gambacorta, 2017. "The real effects of relationship lending," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1133, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    13. Choudhary, M. Ali & Jain, Anil, 2022. "Finance and inequality: The distributional impacts of bank credit rationing," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    14. Allen N. Berger & Christa H. S. Bouwman & Lars Norden & Raluca A. Roman & Gregory F. Udell & Teng Wang, 2024. "Piercing through Opacity: Relationships and Credit Card Lending to Consumers and Small Businesses during Normal Times and the COVID-19 Crisis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 132(2), pages 484-551.
    15. Beatriz, Mikael & Coffinet, Jérôme & Nicolas, Théo, 2022. "Relationship lending and SMEs’ funding costs over the cycle: Why diversification of borrowing matters," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. Song Zhang & Liang Han & Konstantinos Kallias & Antonios Kallias, 2021. "The value of in-person banking: evidence from U.S. small businesses," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1393-1435, November.
    17. Paolo Emilio Mistrulli & Valerio Vacca & Gennaro Corbisiero & Silvia del Prete & Luciano Esposito & Marco Gallo & Mariano Graziano & Maurizio Lozzi & Vincenzo Maffione & Daniele Marangoni & Andrea Mig, 2011. "Mutual Guarantee Institutions (MGIs) and small business credit during the crisis," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 105, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    18. Pierluigi Murro & Valentina Peruzzi, 2022. "Relationship lending and the use of trade credit: the role of relational capital and private information," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 327-360, June.
    19. Acosta-Henao, Miguel & Pratap, Sangeeta & Taboada, Manuel, 2023. "Four facts about relationship lending: The case of Chile 2012-2019," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    20. Cerqueiro, Geraldo & Degryse, Hans & Ongena, Steven, 2011. "Rules versus discretion in loan rate setting," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 503-529, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tcb:econot:2505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tcmgvtr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.