IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Spatial Monopoly Pricing in a Stochastic Environment

Registered author(s):

    This paper reexamines the welfare implications of three pricing regimes (mill, uniform and discriminatory) for a monopoly in a stochastic environment. It con-siders a risk-averse monopolist faces two markets with stochastic and linear demands. The monopolist is assumed to commit to an irreversible price in each market before the uncertainty is resolved. Several unconventional results are shown to be triggered by the presence of demand uncertainty. The reason for the reversal of orthodox intuition is the asymmetry in the risk chacteristics of the markets and the willingness of the monopolist to trade increased level of expected pro ts for reduced risk.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan in its series IEAS Working Paper : academic research with number 05-A004.

    in new window

    Length: 23 pages
    Date of creation: May 2005
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:sin:wpaper:05-a004
    Contact details of provider: Phone: 886-2-27822791
    Fax: 886-2-27853946
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Hsu, Song-ken & Mai, Chao-cheng, 1984. "Production location and random input price," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 45-62, February.
    2. Holahan, William L, 1975. "The Welfare Effects of Spatial Price Discrimination," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 65(3), pages 498-503, June.
    3. repec:cup:cbooks:9780521305525 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Martin J. Beckmann, 1976. "Spatial Price Policies Revisited," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 7(2), pages 619-630, Autumn.
    5. Beckmann, Martin J. & Ingene, Charles A., 1976. "The profit equivalence of mill and uniform pricing policies," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 327-329, September.
    6. Schwartz, Marius, 1990. "Third-Degree Price Discrimination and Output: Generalizing a Welfare Result," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(5), pages 1259-62, December.
    7. repec:cup:cbooks:9780521315647 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Lin-Ti Tan & Song-Ken Hsu, 2000. "Production location under technology uncertainty," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 32(3), pages 445-454, March.
    9. Mathur, Vijay K., 1983. "Location theory of the firm under price uncertainty," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 411-428, August.
    10. Schmalensee, Richard, 1981. "Output and Welfare Implications of Monopolistic Third-Degree Price Discrimination," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(1), pages 242-47, March.
    11. Varian, Hal R, 1985. "Price Discrimination and Social Welfare," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(4), pages 870-75, September.
    12. Anderson, Simon P & de Palma, Andre & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 1989. "Spatial Price Policies Reconsidered," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Greenhut, M L & Ohta, H, 1972. "Monopoly Output Under Alternative Spatial Pricing Techniques," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(4), pages 705-13, September.
    14. Hwang, Hong & Mai, Chao-cheng, 1990. "Effects of Spatial Price Discrimination on Output, Welfare, and Location," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(3), pages 567-75, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sin:wpaper:05-a004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (HsiaoyunLiu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.