IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/shs/wpaper/1406.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Supply-Side Barriers to Maternity-Care Provision in India: A Facility-Based Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Santosh Kumar

    (Department of Economics and International Business, Sam Houston State University)

  • Emily Dansereau

    (University of Washington)

Abstract

Background: Health facilities in many low- and middle-income countries face several types of barriers in delivering quality health services. Availability of resources at the facility may significantly affect the volume and quality of services. We aim to investigate the effect of supply-side determinants of delivery care in India. Methods: Facility data from the District-Level Household Survey (DLHS-3) collected in 2007-2008 were analyzed to explore the effect of supply-side factors on the volume of delivery care at Indian health facilities. A Negative Binomial regression model was fit to the data due to the count and over-dispersion property of the outcome variable (number of deliveries performed at the facility). Results: Availability of a labor room (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR]: 1.81; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.68-1.95) and facility opening hours (IRR: 1.43; CI: 1.35-1.51) were the most significant predictors of the volume of delivery care at the health facilities. Implementation of quality measures was not associated with more deliveries. Statistically significant but very small increases in the IRR were associated with increases in the types of medical (IRR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01-1.08) and paramedical (IRR: 1.06; CI: 1.04-1.08) staff available, and relevant staff trainings (IRR: 1.05; CI: 1.00-1.11). The volume of deliveries was also higher if adequate beds, essential obstetric drugs, medical equipment, communications infrastructure, and electricity were available at the clinic. Findings were robust to the inclusion of a catchment area population size, and district-level controls for education, insurance, religion, wealth, and fertility. Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of supply-side barriers to health services utilization. To meet the Millennium Development Goal of reducing maternal mortality, policymakers should make additional investment in improving the availability of infrastructure at the primary-care level, including labor rooms and hours of operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Santosh Kumar & Emily Dansereau, 2014. "Supply-Side Barriers to Maternity-Care Provision in India: A Facility-Based Analysis," Working Papers 1406, Sam Houston State University, Department of Economics and International Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:shs:wpaper:1406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.shsu.edu/academics/economics-and-international-business/documents/wp_series/wp14-06_paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sisira Sarma, 2009. "Demand for outpatient healthcare," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 265-277, December.
    2. Peabody, John W. & Gertler, Paul J. & Leibowitz, Arleen, 1998. "The policy implications of better structure and process on birth outcomes in Jamaica," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Bijan J. Borah, 2006. "A mixed logit model of health care provider choice: analysis of NSS data for rural India," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(9), pages 915-932, September.
    4. Kara Hanson & M. Kent Ranson & Valeria Oliveira-Cruz & Anne Mills, 2003. "Expanding access to priority health interventions: a framework for understanding the constraints to scaling-up," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(1), pages 1-14.
    5. World Bank, 2012. "World Development Report 2012 [Rapport sur le développement dans le monde 2012]," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 4391, December.
    6. A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (ed.), 2000. "Handbook of Health Economics," Handbook of Health Economics, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 1, number 1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alinda George & Pritee Sharma, 2023. "Spatial disparities in health status and access to health-related interventions in Madhya Pradesh," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 865-902, September.
    2. Xiaotian Zhang & Lvlin Zhou & Henry Asante Antwi, 2019. "The impact of China's latest population policy changes on maternity insurance—a case study in Jiangsu Province," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 617-633, January.
    3. Joshua Amo-Adjei & Kofi Aduo-Adjei & Christiana Opoku-Nyamah & Chimaroake Izugbara, 2018. "Analysis of socioeconomic differences in the quality of antenatal services in low and middle-income countries (LMICs)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Mampi Bose, 2019. "Determinants of Choice of Care Providers During Childbirth in Rural West Bengal, India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 13(1), pages 47-70, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Santosh Kumar & Emily Dansereau, 2014. "Supply-Side Barriers to Maternity-Care in India: A Facility-Based Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-9, August.
    2. Raza, W.A. & Panda, P. & Van de Poel, E. & Dror, D.M. & Bedi, A.S., 2013. "Healthcare Seeking Behavior among Self-help Group Households in Rural Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, India," ISS Working Papers - General Series 50172, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    3. Xuefeng Li & Yong Zhang & Mingyang Du, 2018. "Analysis of Travel Decision-Making for Urban Elderly Healthcare Activities under Temporal and Spatial Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Kumar, Santosh & Dansereau, Emily & Murray, Chris, 2012. "Does Distance matter for Institutional Delivery in Rural India? An Instrumental Variable Approach," MPRA Paper 45762, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Jan 2013.
    5. Srivastava, Divya & McGuire, Alistair, 2015. "Patient access to health care and medicines across low-income countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 21-27.
    6. Finn McGuire & Noemi Kreif & Peter C. Smith, 2021. "The effect of distance on maternal institutional delivery choice: Evidence from Malawi," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(9), pages 2144-2167, September.
    7. Wendy Janssens & Jann Goedecke & Godelieve J de Bree & Sunday A Aderibigbe & Tanimola M Akande & Alice Mesnard, 2016. "The Financial Burden of Non-Communicable Chronic Diseases in Rural Nigeria: Wealth and Gender Heterogeneity in Health Care Utilization and Health Expenditures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    9. Joan Costa-Fonta & Montserrat Font-Vilalta, "undated". "The limits on the Design of Long-Term Care Insurance Schemes in Spain stas," Studies on the Spanish Economy 201, FEDEA.
    10. Felix Meier Zu Selhausen & Jacob Weisdorf, 2016. "A colonial legacy of African gender inequality? Evidence from Christian Kampala, 1895–2011," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 69(1), pages 229-257, February.
    11. Stephanie Barrientos & Adwoa Owusuaa Bobie, 2016. "Promoting Gender equality in the cocoa-chocolate value chain: opportunities and challenges in Ghana," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 062016, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    12. Taylor, Sebastian A.J. & Perez-Ferrer, Carolina & Griffiths, Andrew & Brunner, Eric, 2015. "Scaling up nutrition in fragile and conflict-affected states: The pivotal role of governance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 119-127.
    13. Scheurlen, Elena, 2015. "Time allocation to energy resource collection in rural Ethiopia: Gender-disaggregated household responses to changes in firewood availability:," IFPRI discussion papers 1419, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Astrid Sneyers & Anneleen Vandeplas, 2013. "Girl Power in Agricultural Production: How Much Does it Yield? A Case-Study on the Dairy Sector in India," LICOS Discussion Papers 34113, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
    15. Picarelli, Nathalie, 2016. "Who really benefits from export processing zones? Evidence from Nicaraguan municipalities," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 318-332.
    16. Grönqvist, Hans & Niknami, Susan, 2014. "Alcohol availability and crime: Lessons from liberalized weekend sales restrictions," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 77-84.
    17. Baltagi, Badi H. & Yen, Yin-Fang, 2014. "Hospital treatment rates and spillover effects: Does ownership matter?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 193-202.
    18. Xavier Oudin & Laure Pasquier-Doumer & Thai Pham Minh & François Roubaud & Dat Vu Hoang, 2014. "Adjustment of the Vietnamese Labour Market in Time of Economic fluctuations and Structural Changes," Working Papers DT/2014/04, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    19. G�ng�r KARAKAYA, 2009. "Long-Term Care: Regional Disparities In Belgium," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 4(1(7)_ Spr).
    20. Kai Hong & Peter A. Savelyev & Kegon T. K. Tan, 2020. "Understanding the Mechanisms Linking College Education with Longevity," Journal of Human Capital, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(3), pages 371-400.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:shs:wpaper:1406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Raschke (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deshsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.