IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/73947.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Methods for regionalizing input-output tables

Author

Listed:
  • Szabó, Norbert

Abstract

The present paper introduces the most common methods of regionalizing national input-output tables. First we describe the different groups of methods based on our review of the international literature regarding regionalization. Then we focus on particular methods that can be applied for Hungarian counties highlighting their advantages and disadvantages and synthetize the empirical results of them again based on the literature. On the basis of these experiences we attempt to create a complex method fitted to the available Hungarian regional data. For better understanding in the end we apply our method on an illustrative example consisting of three regions with hypothetical sectors and data.

Suggested Citation

  • Szabó, Norbert, 2015. "Methods for regionalizing input-output tables," MPRA Paper 73947, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:73947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/73947/1/MPRA_paper_73947.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greenstreet, David, 1989. "A conceptual framework for construction of hybrid regional input-output models," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 283-289.
    2. Mike N. Patriquin & William A. White & Janaki R. R. Alavalapati & Adam M. Wellstead, 2002. "A comparison of impact measures from hybrid and synthetic techniques: A case study of the Foothills Model Forest," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 36(2), pages 265-278.
    3. Xuemei Jiang & Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los, 2012. "Improved Estimation of Regional Input--Output Tables Using Cross-regional Methods," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(5), pages 621-637, August.
    4. Timo Tohmo, 2004. "New Developments in the Use of Location Quotients to Estimate Regional Input-Output Coefficients and Multipliers," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 43-54.
    5. Philip Mccann & John H. LL. Dewhurst, 1998. "Regional Size, Industrial Location and Input-Output Expenditure Coefficients," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 435-444.
    6. A. T. Flegg & C. D. Webber, 2000. "Regional Size, Regional Specialization and the FLQ Formula," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 563-569.
    7. Jan Oosterhaven & Ed C van der Knijff & Gerard J Eding, 2003. "Estimating Interregional Economic Impacts: An Evaluation of Nonsurvey, Semisurvey, and Full-Survey Methods," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(1), pages 5-18, January.
    8. Geoff Riddington & Hervey Gibson & John Anderson, 2006. "Comparison of Gravity Model, Survey and Location Quotient-based Local Area Tables and Multipliers," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(9), pages 1069-1081.
    9. Andrea Bonfiglio & Francesco Chelli, 2008. "Assessing the Behaviour of Non-Survey Methods for Constructing Regional Input-Output Tables through a Monte Carlo Simulation," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 243-258.
    10. Randall Jackson, 1998. "Regionalizing National Commodity-by-Industry Accounts," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 223-238.
    11. Michael Lahr & Louis de Mesnard, 2004. "Biproportional Techniques in Input-Output Analysis: Table Updating and Structural Analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 115-134.
    12. Roberto Mínguez & Jan Oosterhaven & Fernando Escobedo, 2009. "Cell‐Corrected Ras Method (Cras) For Updating Or Regionalizing An Input–Output Matrix," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 329-348, May.
    13. Gunnar Lindberg, 2011. "On the appropriate use of (input-output) coefficients to generate non-survey regional input-output tables: Implications for the determination of output multipliers," ERSA conference papers ersa10p800, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Anthony T. Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2013. "Regional Input--Output Tables and the FLQ Formula: A Case Study of Finland," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 703-721, May.
    15. Theo Junius & Jan Oosterhaven, 2003. "The Solution of Updating or Regionalizing a Matrix with both Positive and Negative Entries," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 87-96, March.
    16. Kowalewski, Julia, 2012. "Regionalization of national input-output tables: Empirical evidence on the use of the FLQ formula," HWWI Research Papers 126, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    17. Patrick Canning & Zhi Wang, 2005. "A Flexible Mathematical Programming Model to Estimate Interregional Input–Output Accounts," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 539-563, August.
    18. Jeffery I. Round, 1983. "Nonsurvey Techniques: A Critical Review of the Theory and the Evidence," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 8(3), pages 189-212, December.
    19. McDougall, Robert A., 1999. "Entropy Theory and RAS are Friends," Working papers 283439, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. Ralston, Scott N & Hastings, Steven E & Brucker, Sharon M, 1986. "Improving Regional I-O Models: Evidence against Uniform Regional Purchase Coefficients across Rows," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 20(1), pages 65-80, March.
    21. McDougall, Robert, 1999. "Entropy Theory and RAS are Friends," GTAP Working Papers 300, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alastair Greig & Katerina Lisenkova & Graeme Roy, 2018. "A Data Map of Existing UK Data Sources Related to Regional Trade," Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2018-03, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Umed Temursho & Manuel Alejandro Cardenete & Krzysztof Wojtowicz & Luis Rey & Matthias Weitzel & Toon Vandyck & Bert Saveyn, 2020. "Projecting input-output tables for model baselines," JRC Research Reports JRC120513, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Kristinn Hermannsson, 2016. "Beyond Intermediates: The Role of Consumption and Commuting in the Construction of Local Input–Output Tables," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 315-339, July.
    3. Johannes Többen & Tobias Heinrich Kronenberg, 2015. "Construction Of Multi-Regional Input--Output Tables Using The Charm Method," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 487-507, December.
    4. Lankhuizen, Maureen & Boonstra, Harm Jan & de Blois, Chris, 2020. "Unpacking freight – Identifying conditions driving regional freight transport in statistics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 415-435.
    5. Gunnar Lindberg, 2011. "On the appropriate use of (input-output) coefficients to generate non-survey regional input-output tables: Implications for the determination of output multipliers," ERSA conference papers ersa10p800, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Anthony T. Flegg & Leonardo J. Mastronardi & Carlos A. Romero, 2016. "Evaluating the FLQ and AFLQ formulae for estimating regional input coefficients: empirical evidence for the province of Córdoba, Argentina," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 21-37, March.
    7. Anthony T. Flegg & Yongming Huang & Timo Tohmo, 2015. "Using Charm to Adjust for Cross-Hauling: The Case of the Province of Hubei, China," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 391-413, September.
    8. Georgios Lampiris & Christos Karelakis & Efstratios Loizou, 2020. "Comparison of non-survey techniques for constructing regional input–output tables," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 225-266, November.
    9. Anthony Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2011. "Regional Input-Output Tables and the FLQ Formula: A Case Study of Finland," ERSA conference papers ersa11p334, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Anthony T Flegg & Yongming Huang & Timo Tohmo, 2013. "Cross-hauling and regional input-output tables: the case of the province of Hubei, China," Working Papers 20131310, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    11. Natalie Stoeckl, 2012. "Comparing Multipliers from Survey and Non-Survey Based IO Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 35(4), pages 367-388, October.
    12. Cristian Mardones & Darling Silva, 2023. "Evaluation of Non-survey Methods for the Construction of Regional Input–Output Matrices When There is Partial Historical Information," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 1173-1205, March.
    13. Anthony T. Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2013. "Estimating regional input coefficients and multipliers: The Use of the FLQ is not a Gamble," Working Papers 20131302, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    14. Xesús Pereira-López & Napoleón Guillermo Sánchez-Chóez & Melchor Fernández-Fernández, 2021. "Performance of bidimensional location quotients for constructing input–output tables," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Kowalewski Julia, 2013. "Inter-industrial Relations and Sectoral Employment Development in German Regions," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 233(4), pages 486-504, August.
    16. Cristian Mardones & Darling Silva, 2021. "Estimation of regional input coefficients and output multipliers for the regions of Chile," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(4), pages 875-889, August.
    17. Andrea Bonfiglio & Francesco Chelli, 2008. "Assessing the Behaviour of Non-Survey Methods for Constructing Regional Input-Output Tables through a Monte Carlo Simulation," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 243-258.
    18. Jakub Boratyński, 2016. "A Bayesian Approach to Matrix Balancing: Transformation of Industry-Level Data under NACE Revision," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 8(4), pages 219-239, December.
    19. Casiano A. Manrique-de-Lara-Peñate & Dolores R. Santos-Peñate, 2017. "SAM updating using multi-objective optimization techniques," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(3), pages 647-667, August.
    20. Anthony T. Flegg & Yongming Huang & Timo Tohmo, 2015. "Using CHARM to adjust for cross-hauling: the case of the Province of Hubei, China," Working Papers 20151506, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    input-output table; regionalization; interregional trade;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • P33 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - International Trade, Finance, Investment, Relations, and Aid
    • P45 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - International Linkages
    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • R15 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Methods

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:73947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.