IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/120450.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Универсальный Инструмент Координации
[Universal Coordination Instrument]

Author

Listed:
  • Parinov, Sergey

Abstract

Рассматривается микроуровневая детализация процессов и причинно-следственных связей, с помощью которых агенты (люди) учитывают деятельность друг друга в процессе принятия экономических решений. В качестве способа сбора распределенной между агентами информации, которая важна для принятия решений, рассматривается концепция коллективной ментальной модели (КММ). Рассмотрены способности агентов формировать КММ при трех основных вариантах коммуникаций (прямые, косвенные и предшествующие). На этой основе разработана концепция универсального инструмента координации (УИК), который присутствует у каждого социально-экономического агента. Агенты используют УИК в смешанном индивидуально-коллективном режиме для учета деятельности друг друга. Конструкция УИК определена как особого рода агентная имитационная модель, которая является для агентов средой для их информационных взаимодействий и состоит из блоков «интерфейс» и «вычислитель». Данные блоки настраиваются для каждого вида совместной деятельности агентов в процессе решения агентами некоторой оптимизационной задачи. Полученные результаты являются расширением микроэкономической теории, описывая как агенты могут переопределять все условия максимизации своих целевых функций, включая содержание самой функции, в целях наилучшего учета намерений и возможностей друг друга, а также в ответ на критические возмущения. Главные выводы исследования – экономические индивиды реализуют два вида рационального поведения, которое приводит к двум видам равновесия в экономической системе. Это позволяет экономической системе функционирования эффективно при содержательном неравновесии. Поскольку возмущения неустранимы, то рациональный экономический порядок состоит в максимально эффективном восстановлении равновесия в ответ на возмущения. Прикладным использованием полученных результатов является возможная реализация УИК в виде компьютерной системы в целях создания средств для эффективной перекоординации экономической деятельности и восстановления равновесия. The micro-level detailing of the processes and causal relationships with the help of which agents (individuals) take into account each other’s activities in the process of making economic decisions is considered. The concept of a shared (collective) mental model (SMM) is considered to collect and process information distributed among agents that is important for decision-making. The abilities of agents to form SMM are considered under three main communication options (direct, indirect, and previous). On this basis, the concept of a universal coordination instrument (UCI) has been developed, which is present in every socio-economic agent. Agents use their UCIs in a mixed individual-collective mode to account for each other’s activities. The key findings of this study are that individuals engage in two types of rational behavior that lead to two types of equilibrium in the economic system. This allows the system to operate efficiently under substantive disequilibrium.

Suggested Citation

  • Parinov, Sergey, 2024. "Универсальный Инструмент Координации [Universal Coordination Instrument]," MPRA Paper 120450, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:120450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/120450/1/MPRA_paper_120450.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hurwicz,Leonid & Reiter,Stanley, 2008. "Designing Economic Mechanisms," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521724104, October.
    2. Arthur T. Denzau & Douglass C. North, 1994. "Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 3-31, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Masahiko Aoki, 2013. "Institutions as cognitive media between strategic interactions and individual beliefs," Chapters, in: Comparative Institutional Analysis, chapter 17, pages 298-312, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Brigitte Granville & Jaume Martorell Cruz & Martha Prevezer, 2015. "Elites, Thickets and Institutions: French Resistance versus German Adaptation to Economic Change, 1945-2015," Working Papers 63, Queen Mary, University of London, School of Business and Management, Centre for Globalisation Research.
    3. Michael Stuetzer & David B. Audretsch & Martin Obschonka & Samuel D. Gosling & Peter J. Rentfrow & Jeff Potter, 2018. "Entrepreneurship culture, knowledge spillovers and the growth of regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(5), pages 608-618, May.
    4. Jan Schnellenbach, 2023. "The concept of Ordnungspolitik: rule-based economic policymaking from the perspective of the Freiburg School," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 195(3), pages 283-300, June.
    5. Terry Flew & Agata Stepnik, 2024. "The Value of News: Aligning Economic and Social Value From an Institutional Perspective," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    6. Peter Wirtz, 1999. "Évolution institutionnelle, schémas mentaux et gouvernement des entreprises:le cas Krupp-Thyssen," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 2(1), pages 117-143, March.
    7. Schnellenbach, Jan & Schubert, Christian, 2015. "Behavioral political economy: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 40(PB), pages 395-417.
    8. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Beckmann, Markus, 2008. "Corporate citizenship as stakeholder management: An ordonomic approach to business ethics," Discussion Papers 2008-4, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Chair of Economic Ethics.
    9. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Everding, Sebastian, 2020. "Do hybrids impede sustainability? How semantic reorientations and governance reforms can produce and preserve sustainability in sharing business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 174-185.
    10. Joachim Ahrens & Patrick Jünemann, 2011. "Adaptive Efficiency and Pragmatic Flexibility: Characteristics of Institutional Change in Capitalism, Chinese-style," Chapters, in: Werner Pascha & Cornelia Storz & Markus Taube (ed.), Institutional Variety in East Asia, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Colin C. Williams & Brunilda Kosta, 2019. "Evaluating Institutional Theories Of Informal Sector Entrepreneurship: Some Lessons From Albania," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Michaela Haase & Emmanuel Raufflet, 2017. "Ideologies in Markets, Organizations, and Business Ethics: Drafting a Map: Introduction to the Special Issue," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(4), pages 629-639, June.
    13. Karlson, Nils, 2012. "The Limits of Pragmatism in Institutional Change," Ratio Working Papers 194, The Ratio Institute.
    14. didier chabaud & Parthenay Claude & Yannick Perez, 2005. "Environnement institutionnel et trajectoire des entreprises : une analyse northienne de l’industrie électrique," Post-Print hal-04297605, HAL.
    15. Coyne, Christopher J. & Mathers, Rachel L., 2011. "Rituals: An economic interpretation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 74-84.
    16. Hefeker, Carsten, 2022. "Policy coordination under model disagreement and asymmetric shocks," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    17. Bo Rothstein, 2011. "Can markets be expected to prevent themselves from self‐destruction?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(4), pages 387-404, December.
    18. Piotti, Geny, 2007. "Why do companies relocate? The German discourse on relocation," MPIfG Discussion Paper 07/14, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    19. Tony Yu, 2001. "An Entrepreneurial Perspective of Institutional Change," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 217-236, September.
    20. Garofalo, Maria Rosaria, 2011. "Il volontariato può sostenere lo sviluppo? Riflessioni metodologiche per la costruzione di un frame work teorico [Can the voluntary sector sustain the development path of an economy? Suggestions fo," MPRA Paper 40008, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    микроэкономическая теория; экономическая система; вдали от равновесия; нестабильность предпочтений; процедурная рациональность; координационное равновесие;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • D47 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Market Design
    • D50 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - General
    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:120450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.