IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/q59dr.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Integrating Spatio-temporal Diffusion into Statistical Forecasting Models of Armed Conflict via Non-parametric Smoothing

Author

Listed:
  • Racek, Daniel
  • Thurner, Paul
  • Kauermann, Goeran

Abstract

Political armed conflict is responsible for thousands of fatalities every year. Facilitated by advancements in conflict event databases, research studies have moved towards predicting conflict and understanding its determinants subnationally. However, existing statistical and predictive models do not (fully) account for the diffusion and thus dependence of armed conflict across both time and space. As a result, predictive performance deteriorates, and predictors of interest are potentially biased. To address these shortcomings, this paper introduces a statistical regression model that captures both the spatial as well as temporal dimension of conflict diffusion, while its effects remain fully interpretable. Using conflict data from Africa, we demonstrate the importance of accounting for conflict diffusion and quantify its effects. We observe that conflict exhibits relevant dependence up to a distance of 522.5 km. Studying more complex diffusion patterns, we find that conflict tends to originate in high population areas and from there diffuses to lower population areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Racek, Daniel & Thurner, Paul & Kauermann, Goeran, 2024. "Integrating Spatio-temporal Diffusion into Statistical Forecasting Models of Armed Conflict via Non-parametric Smoothing," OSF Preprints q59dr, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:q59dr
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/q59dr
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/65e71b44e5e51c030bbc576c/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/q59dr?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Chadefaux, 2022. "A shape-based approach to conflict forecasting," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 633-648, July.
    2. Paola Vesco & Håvard Hegre & Michael Colaresi & Remco Bastiaan Jansen & Adeline Lo & Gregor Reisch & Nils B. Weidmann, 2022. "United they stand: Findings from an escalation prediction competition," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 860-896, July.
    3. Samuel Bazzi & Robert A. Blair & Christopher Blattman & Oeindrila Dube & Matthew Gudgeon & Richard Peck, 2022. "The Promise and Pitfalls of Conflict Prediction: Evidence from Colombia and Indonesia," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(4), pages 764-779, October.
    4. Patrick T. Brandt & Vito D’Orazio & Latifur Khan & Yi-Fan Li & Javier Osorio & Marcus Sianan, 2022. "Conflict forecasting with event data and spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 800-822, July.
    5. Cook, Scott J. & Hays, Jude C. & Franzese, Robert J., 2023. "STADL Up! The Spatiotemporal Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model for TSCS Data Analysis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 117(1), pages 59-79, February.
    6. Vito D’Orazio & Yu Lin, 2022. "Forecasting conflict in Africa with automated machine learning systems," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 714-738, July.
    7. Alex Reinhart & Joel Greenhouse, 2018. "Self‐exciting point processes with spatial covariates: modelling the dynamics of crime," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1305-1329, November.
    8. Babatunde Abidoye & Massimiliano Calì, 2021. "Income Shocks and Conflict: Evidence from Nigeria," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 30(5), pages 480-509.
    9. Cornelius Fritz & Marius Mehrl & Paul W. Thurner & Göran Kauermann, 2022. "The role of governmental weapons procurements in forecasting monthly fatalities in intrastate conflicts: A semiparametric hierarchical hurdle model," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 778-799, July.
    10. Frederic Paik Schoenberg & Marc Hoffmann & Ryan J. Harrigan, 2019. "A recursive point process model for infectious diseases," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(5), pages 1271-1287, October.
    11. Cook, Scott J. & Hays, Jude C. & Franzese, Robert J., 2023. "STADL Up! The Spatio-Temporal Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model for TSCS Data Analysis—CORRIGENDUM," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 117(1), pages 362-364, February.
    12. Jonas Vestby & Jürgen Brandsch & Vilde Bergstad Larsen & Peder Landsverk & Andreas Forø Tollefsen, 2022. "Predicting (de-)escalation of sub-national violence using gradient boosting: Does it work?," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 841-859, July.
    13. Simon N. Wood, 2003. "Thin plate regression splines," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 65(1), pages 95-114, February.
    14. Hannes Mueller & Dominic Rohner & David Schönholzer, 2022. "Ethnic Violence Across Space," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(642), pages 709-740.
    15. Andreas Lindholm & Johannes Hendriks & Adrian Wills & Thomas B. Schön, 2022. "Predicting political violence using a state-space model," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 759-777, July.
    16. Mohler, George, 2014. "Marked point process hotspot maps for homicide and gun crime prediction in Chicago," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 491-497.
    17. Benjamin J. Radford, 2022. "High resolution conflict forecasting with spatial convolutions and long short-term memory," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 739-758, July.
    18. Quansheng Ge & Mengmeng Hao & Fangyu Ding & Dong Jiang & Jürgen Scheffran & David Helman & Tobias Ide, 2022. "Modelling armed conflict risk under climate change with machine learning and time-series data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    19. David Randahl & Johan Vegelius, 2022. "Predicting escalating and de-escalating violence in Africa using Markov models," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 597-613, July.
    20. Racek, Daniel & Thurner, Paul W. & Davidson, Brittany I. & Zhu, Xiao Xiang & Kauermann, Göran, 2024. "Conflict forecasting using remote sensing data: An application to the Syrian civil war," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 373-391.
    21. Sendhil Mullainathan & Jann Spiess, 2017. "Machine Learning: An Applied Econometric Approach," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 87-106, Spring.
    22. Maconga, Carson W., 2023. "Arid fields where conflict grows: How drought drives extremist violence in Sub-Saharan Africa," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    23. Håvard Hegre & Paola Vesco & Michael Colaresi, 2022. "Lessons from an escalation prediction competition," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 521-554, July.
    24. Schutte, Sebastian, 2017. "Regions at Risk: Predicting Conflict Zones in African Insurgencies," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 447-465, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mueller, H. & Rauh, C. & Seimon, B., 2024. "Introducing a Global Dataset on Conflict Forecasts and News Topics," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2404, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Daisuke Miyakawa & Kohei Shintani, 2020. "Disagreement between Human and Machine Predictions," IMES Discussion Paper Series 20-E-11, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan.
    3. Grames, Eliza M. & Stepule, Piper L. & Herrick, Susan Z. & Ranelli, Benjamin T. & Elphick, Chris S., 2022. "Separating acoustic signal into underlying behaviors with self-exciting point process models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    4. de Blasio, Guido & D'Ignazio, Alessio & Letta, Marco, 2022. "Gotham city. Predicting ‘corrupted’ municipalities with machine learning," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Hannes Mueller & Christopher Rauh, 2022. "The Hard Problem of Prediction for Conflict Prevention," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(6), pages 2440-2467.
    6. Mark Musumba & Naureen Fatema & Shahriar Kibriya, 2021. "Prevention Is Better Than Cure: Machine Learning Approach to Conflict Prediction in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Rummens, Anneleen & Hardyns, Wim, 2021. "The effect of spatiotemporal resolution on predictive policing model performance," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 125-133.
    8. Kieran Kalair & Colm Connaughton & Pierfrancesco Alaimo Di Loro, 2021. "A non‐parametric Hawkes process model of primary and secondary accidents on a UK smart motorway," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 80-97, January.
    9. Tobias Ruttenauer, 2024. "Spatial Data Analysis," Papers 2402.09895, arXiv.org.
    10. M.L. Nores & M.P. Díaz, 2016. "Bootstrap hypothesis testing in generalized additive models for comparing curves of treatments in longitudinal studies," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 810-826, April.
    11. Sophie-Charlotte Klose & Johannes Lederer, 2020. "A Pipeline for Variable Selection and False Discovery Rate Control With an Application in Labor Economics," Papers 2006.12296, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    12. Georgios Gioldasis & Antonio Musolesi & Michel Simioni, 2020. "Model uncertainty, nonlinearities and out-of-sample comparison: evidence from international technology diffusion," Working Papers hal-02790523, HAL.
    13. Shoshan, Vered & Hazan, Tamir & Plonsky, Ori, 2023. "BEAST-Net: Learning novel behavioral insights using a neural network adaptation of a behavioral model," OSF Preprints kaeny, Center for Open Science.
    14. Juergen Deppner & Marcelo Cajias, 2024. "Accounting for Spatial Autocorrelation in Algorithm-Driven Hedonic Models: A Spatial Cross-Validation Approach," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 235-273, February.
    15. Stephane Helleringer & Chong You & Laurence Fleury & Laetitia Douillot & Insa Diouf & Cheikh Tidiane Ndiaye & Valerie Delaunay & Rene Vidal, 2019. "Improving age measurement in low- and middle-income countries through computer vision: A test in Senegal," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 40(9), pages 219-260.
    16. Naguib, Costanza, 2019. "Estimating the Heterogeneous Impact of the Free Movement of Persons on Relative Wage Mobility," Economics Working Paper Series 1903, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    17. Philippe Goulet Coulombe & Maxime Leroux & Dalibor Stevanovic & Stéphane Surprenant, 2022. "How is machine learning useful for macroeconomic forecasting?," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(5), pages 920-964, August.
    18. Akash Malhotra, 2018. "A hybrid econometric-machine learning approach for relative importance analysis: Prioritizing food policy," Papers 1806.04517, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2020.
    19. Thiemo Fetzer & Stephan Kyburz, 2018. "Cohesive Institutions and Political Violence," HiCN Working Papers 271, Households in Conflict Network.
    20. Tobias Götze & Marc Gürtler & Eileen Witowski, 2020. "Improving CAT bond pricing models via machine learning," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 428-446, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:q59dr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.