Disagreement between human and machine predictions

We document how professional analysts' predictions of firm exits disagree with machine-based predictions. First, on average, human predictions underperform machine predictions. Second, however, the relative performance of human to machine predictions improves for firms with specific characteristics, such as less observable information, possibly due to the unstructured information used only in human predictions. Third, for firms with less information, reallocating prediction tasks from machine to analysts reduces type I error while simultaneously increasing type II error. Under certain conditions, human predictions can outperform machine predictions.(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)