IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v468y2022ics0304380022000837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Separating acoustic signal into underlying behaviors with self-exciting point process models

Author

Listed:
  • Grames, Eliza M.
  • Stepule, Piper L.
  • Herrick, Susan Z.
  • Ranelli, Benjamin T.
  • Elphick, Chris S.

Abstract

In animal communication, signals can arise endogenously or in response to cues, such as signals by conspecifics. When one signal serves dual functions, such as in birds that use the same song for mate attraction and territorial defense, the underlying reason for a vocalization cannot be determined without direct observations, and even then, may be hard to discern. We present an inhomogeneous, self-exciting point process model to estimate the underlying reasons for why an individual initiates a signal. In our application of these models, endogenous signals are assumed to arise at a constant rate, but each signal can also instigate (“self-excite”) additional signals by conspecific individuals. When applied to bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) calls and ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilla) songs, our model performs as well as a homogeneous point process model typically used to describe count data, while providing additional detail on the underlying motivations for signals. Although we apply the models to acoustic signals, our model can be applied to any self-exciting process and can be extended to include spatiotemporal dynamics in signals.

Suggested Citation

  • Grames, Eliza M. & Stepule, Piper L. & Herrick, Susan Z. & Ranelli, Benjamin T. & Elphick, Chris S., 2022. "Separating acoustic signal into underlying behaviors with self-exciting point process models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:468:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022000837
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022000837
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109965?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce E. Byers, 2007. "Extrapair paternity in chestnut-sided warblers is correlated with consistent vocal performance," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(1), pages 130-136, January.
    2. Emmanuel Bacry & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Jean-Franc{c}ois Muzy, 2015. "Hawkes processes in finance," Papers 1502.04592, arXiv.org, revised May 2015.
    3. Bowsher, Clive G., 2007. "Modelling security market events in continuous time: Intensity based, multivariate point process models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 876-912, December.
    4. Chavez-Demoulin, V. & McGill, J.A., 2012. "High-frequency financial data modeling using Hawkes processes," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 3415-3426.
    5. Alex Reinhart & Joel Greenhouse, 2018. "Self‐exciting point processes with spatial covariates: modelling the dynamics of crime," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1305-1329, November.
    6. Frederic Paik Schoenberg & Marc Hoffmann & Ryan J. Harrigan, 2019. "A recursive point process model for infectious diseases," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(5), pages 1271-1287, October.
    7. Sebastian Meyer & Johannes Elias & Michael Höhle, 2012. "A Space–Time Conditional Intensity Model for Invasive Meningococcal Disease Occurrence," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 607-616, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kyungsub Lee, 2022. "Application of Hawkes volatility in the observation of filtered high-frequency price process in tick structures," Papers 2207.05939, arXiv.org.
    2. Francine Gresnigt & Erik Kole & Philip Hans Franses, 2017. "Specification Testing in Hawkes Models," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 139-171.
    3. Anatoliy Swishchuk & Aiden Huffman, 2018. "General Compound Hawkes Processes in Limit Order Books," Papers 1812.02298, arXiv.org.
    4. Hainaut, Donatien & Goutte, Stephane, 2018. "A switching microstructure model for stock prices," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2018014, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    5. Anatoliy Swishchuk, 2021. "Modelling of Limit Order Books by General Compound Hawkes Processes with Implementations," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 399-428, March.
    6. Hai-Chuan Xu & Wei-Xing Zhou, 2020. "Modeling aggressive market order placements with Hawkes factor models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
    7. Anatoliy Swishchuk & Bruno Remillard & Robert Elliott & Jonathan Chavez-Casillas, 2017. "Compound Hawkes Processes in Limit Order Books," Papers 1712.03106, arXiv.org.
    8. Hyun Jin Jang & Kiseop Lee & Kyungsub Lee, 2020. "Systemic risk in market microstructure of crude oil and gasoline futures prices: A Hawkes flocking model approach," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(2), pages 247-275, February.
    9. Schatz, Michael & Wheatley, Spencer & Sornette, Didier, 2022. "The ARMA Point Process and its Estimation," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 164-182.
    10. Yang Shen & Bin Zou, 2021. "Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection in Contagious Markets," Papers 2110.09417, arXiv.org.
    11. Anatoliy Swishchuk, 2017. "General Compound Hawkes Processes in Limit Order Books," Papers 1706.07459, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2017.
    12. Rachele Foschi & Francesca Lilla & Cecilia Mancini, 2020. "Warnings about future jumps: properties of the exponential Hawkes model," Working Papers 13/2020, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    13. Anatoliy Swishchuk & Aiden Huffman, 2020. "General Compound Hawkes Processes in Limit Order Books," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Ivan Jericevich & Patrick Chang & Tim Gebbie, 2021. "Simulation and estimation of a point-process market-model with a matching engine," Papers 2105.02211, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    15. Ulrich Horst & Wei Xu, 2019. "Functional Limit Theorems for Marked Hawkes Point Measures ," Working Papers hal-02443841, HAL.
    16. Lucio Maria Calcagnile & Giacomo Bormetti & Michele Treccani & Stefano Marmi & Fabrizio Lillo, 2015. "Collective synchronization and high frequency systemic instabilities in financial markets," Papers 1505.00704, arXiv.org.
    17. Swishchuk, Anatoliy & Zagst, Rudi & Zeller, Gabriela, 2021. "Hawkes processes in insurance: Risk model, application to empirical data and optimal investment," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PA), pages 107-124.
    18. Xiaofei Lu & Frédéric Abergel, 2017. "Limit order book modelling with high dimensional Hawkes processes," Working Papers hal-01512430, HAL.
    19. Omar Euch & Masaaki Fukasawa & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2018. "The microstructural foundations of leverage effect and rough volatility," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 241-280, April.
    20. Nikolaus Graf von Luckner & Rüdiger Kiesel, 2021. "Modeling Market Order Arrivals on the German Intraday Electricity Market with the Hawkes Process," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-31, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:468:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022000837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.