IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v28y2026i2p577-593.html

Tides Need STEMMED: A Locally Operating Spatiotemporal Mutually Exciting Point Process with Dynamic Network for Improving Opioid Overdose Death Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Che-Yi Liao

    (H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Zheng Dong

    (Amazon.com, Inc., Seattle, Washington 98109)

  • Gian-Gabriel P. Garcia

    (Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195)

  • Kamran Paynabar

    (H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Yao Xie

    (H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Mohammad S. Jalali

    (MGH Institute for Technology Assessment, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114; and Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

Abstract

Problem definition : Efforts to mitigate the U.S. opioid crisis have been complicated by ever-changing trends in opioid overdose deaths (OODs) across communities and drug types. Public health surveillance efforts are hampered by these challenges, making prediction of local OOD trends and coordination across communities critical. In this research, we design a model-based public health surveillance system capable of leveraging implicit connections between past and future OODs, thereby operating across locales and providing accurate local and global forecasts and unique insights of OOD trends. Methodology/results : We develop a spatiotemporal mutually exciting point process with dynamic network (STEMMED): a point process network wherein each node models a unique community–drug event stream with a dynamic mutually exciting structure, accounting for influences from other nodes. STEMMED can be decomposed node-by-node, suggesting that it can be tractably parameterized via distributed learning. Leveraging this decomposability, we outline an online cooperative forecasting procedure among local communities and characterize data-sharing approaches among local entities, including strategies based on drug types, geographical affiliations, and proximity. We then conduct a numerical study wherein we parameterize STEMMED using individual-level OOD data and city-level demographics in Massachusetts. In our off-line analysis, we identify a notable cluster formation process of OODs centered around Boston. Additionally, our analysis indicates a growing link between fentanyl and psychostimulants over time. Then, in the online model deployment setting, we find that STEMMED outperforms well-established forecasting models and that drug-based data-sharing policies across cities offer advantages over distance-based county-based and distance-based data-sharing policies. Further, a STEMMED-based OOD surveillance system achieves more than 40% improvement in detection delays relative to evidence-based surveillance systems that are currently hindered by considerable data lags. Managerial implications : STEMMED provides accurate forecasts of local OOD trends and highlights complex interactions between OODs across communities and drug types, informing the design and facilitating the timing of impactful policy interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Che-Yi Liao & Zheng Dong & Gian-Gabriel P. Garcia & Kamran Paynabar & Yao Xie & Mohammad S. Jalali, 2026. "Tides Need STEMMED: A Locally Operating Spatiotemporal Mutually Exciting Point Process with Dynamic Network for Improving Opioid Overdose Death Prediction," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 577-593, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:28:y:2026:i:2:p:577-593
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2024.0946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2024.0946
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2024.0946?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan G. Hawkes, 2018. "Hawkes processes and their applications to finance: a review," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 193-198, February.
    2. Tse Yang Lim & Erin J. Stringfellow & Celia A. Stafford & Catherine DiGennaro & Jack B. Homer & Wayne Wakeland & Sara L. Eggers & Reza Kazemi & Lukas Glos & Emily G. Ewing & Calvin B. Bannister & Keit, 2022. "Modeling the evolution of the US opioid crisis for national policy development," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 119(23), pages 2115714119-, June.
    3. Sebastian Meyer & Johannes Elias & Michael Höhle, 2012. "A Space–Time Conditional Intensity Model for Invasive Meningococcal Disease Occurrence," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 607-616, June.
    4. Mohler, G. O. & Short, M. B. & Brantingham, P. J. & Schoenberg, F. P. & Tita, G. E., 2011. "Self-Exciting Point Process Modeling of Crime," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 100-108.
    5. Sean F Altekruse & Candace M Cosgrove & William C Altekruse & Richard A Jenkins & Carlos Blanco, 2020. "Socioeconomic risk factors for fatal opioid overdoses in the United States: Findings from the Mortality Disparities in American Communities Study (MDAC)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Che-Yi Liao & Peiliang Bai & Lance A. Waller & Kamran Paynabar, 2025. "Estimating Hidden Epidemic: A Bayesian Spatiotemporal Compartmental Modeling Approach," INFORMS Joural on Data Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 230-247, July.
    7. Eric W. Fox & Martin B. Short & Frederic P. Schoenberg & Kathryn D. Coronges & Andrea L. Bertozzi, 2016. "Modeling E-mail Networks and Inferring Leadership Using Self-Exciting Point Processes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 564-584, April.
    8. Chiang, Wen-Hao & Liu, Xueying & Mohler, George, 2022. "Hawkes process modeling of COVID-19 with mobility leading indicators and spatial covariates," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 505-520.
    9. Alex Reinhart & Joel Greenhouse, 2018. "Self‐exciting point processes with spatial covariates: modelling the dynamics of crime," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1305-1329, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Álvaro Briz-Redón & Jorge Mateu, 2026. "A self-exciting spatio-temporal model with a smooth space-time-varying productivity parameter," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 110(1), pages 65-89, March.
    2. Mercuri, Lorenzo & Perchiazzo, Andrea & Rroji, Edit, 2024. "A Hawkes model with CARMA(p,q) intensity," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 1-26.
    3. Pierfrancesco Alaimo Di Loro & Marco Mingione & Paolo Fantozzi, 2025. "Semi-parametric Spatio-Temporal Hawkes Process for Modelling Road Accidents in Rome," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 30(1), pages 8-38, March.
    4. Giada Adelfio & Marcello Chiodi, 2021. "Including covariates in a space-time point process with application to seismicity," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(3), pages 947-971, September.
    5. Andrew P. Wheeler & Wouter Steenbeek, 2021. "Mapping the Risk Terrain for Crime Using Machine Learning," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 445-480, June.
    6. Chenlong Li & Zhanjie Song & Wenjun Wang, 2020. "Space–time inhomogeneous background intensity estimators for semi-parametric space–time self-exciting point process models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(4), pages 945-967, August.
    7. Zhang, Zhehao & Xing, Ruina, 2025. "Multivariate Hawkes process allowing for common shocks," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    8. Sobin Joseph & Shashi Jain, 2023. "A neural network based model for multi-dimensional nonlinear Hawkes processes," Papers 2303.03073, arXiv.org.
    9. Grames, Eliza M. & Stepule, Piper L. & Herrick, Susan Z. & Ranelli, Benjamin T. & Elphick, Chris S., 2022. "Separating acoustic signal into underlying behaviors with self-exciting point process models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
    10. John Leverso & Youness Diouane & George Mohler, 2025. "Measuring Online–Offline Spillover of Gang Violence Using Bivariate Hawkes Processes," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 103-131, March.
    11. Santitissadeekorn, Naratip & Lloyd, David J.B. & Short, Martin B. & Delahaies, Sylvain, 2020. "Approximate filtering of conditional intensity process for Poisson count data: Application to urban crime," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Jing Chen, 2025. "Editorial A Tribute to Professor Geoffrey Alan Hawkes (19 September 1938–9 November 2023)," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 30(1), pages 1-7, March.
    13. Masoumeh Fallahi & Reza Pourtaheri & Farzad Eskandari, 2024. "The Multivariate Generalized Linear Hawkes Process in High Dimensions with Applications in Neuroscience," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Tomlinson, Matthew F. & Greenwood, David & Mucha-Kruczyński, Marcin, 2024. "2T-POT Hawkes model for left- and right-tail conditional quantile forecasts of financial log returns: Out-of-sample comparison of conditional EVT models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 324-347.
    15. Youngsoo Seol, 2023. "Large Deviations for Hawkes Processes with Randomized Baseline Intensity," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-10, April.
    16. Peter Boyd & James Molyneux, 2021. "Assessing the contagiousness of mass shootings with nonparametric Hawkes processes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Rummens, Anneleen & Hardyns, Wim, 2021. "The effect of spatiotemporal resolution on predictive policing model performance," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 125-133.
    18. Baichuan Yuan & Frederic P. Schoenberg & Andrea L. Bertozzi, 2021. "Fast estimation of multivariate spatiotemporal Hawkes processes and network reconstruction," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 73(6), pages 1127-1152, December.
    19. Alex Reinhart & Joel Greenhouse, 2018. "Self‐exciting point processes with spatial covariates: modelling the dynamics of crime," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(5), pages 1305-1329, November.
    20. Francesco Serafini & Finn Lindgren & Mark Naylor, 2023. "Approximation of Bayesian Hawkes process with inlabru," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(5), August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:28:y:2026:i:2:p:577-593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.