IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Labour Productivity in Transport and Communications: International Comparisons

Listed author(s):
  • Mary O'Mahony


We construct benchmark estimates of labour productivity covering the transport and communications sectors for the UK, Germany and the US for 1992 and 1993. The estimates are based on industry data and use physical indicators of output. In transport, UK and German productivity levels are similar though with the UK leading in air transport. The US lead is substantial, particularly in rail and trucking, even after adjusting for differences in stage length. In telecommunications the UK and Germany are again at roughly similar levels, but US productivity is twice as high. In postal services the US lead is 37% after adjusting for quality but here Germany is at only 50% of the UK level. We compare these industry-based estimates with those obtained using value added from national accounts converted at purchasing power parities and find them to be broadly similar.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by National Institute of Economic and Social Research in its series NIESR Discussion Papers with number 117.

in new window

Date of creation: Apr 1997
Handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:220
Contact details of provider: Postal:
2 Dean Trench Street Smith Square London SW1P 3HE

Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nsr:niesrd:220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Library & Information Manager)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.