Have Renewable Portfolio Standards Raised Electricity Rates? Evidence from U.S. Electric Utilities
Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) have been a contentious issue amongst policymakers in recent years. Neoclassical theory would suggest that, in the short-run, RPS mandates will raise electricity rates if the cost of electricity generation via renewable energy technologies exceeds that of convention fossil fuel technologies. This study uses a quasi-experimental approach to investigate the effect of RPS policies on retail residential electricity rates. The study provides one of the first econometric investigations of the economic effect of RPS mandates. The empirical approach uses a panel dataset of 2,602 U.S. electric utilities from 1990 to 2006. The empirical findings provide several policy insights on the effect of RPS mandates. First, a state RPS mandate, on average, positively affects the average residential electricity rate. Second, no spillover effect exists for the RPS effect on electricity rates. In other words, utilities that operate in a RPS state, but are not subject to an RPS requirement, do not experience a significant increase in electric rates. Third, the RPS effect on residential electricity rates is significantly lower in states with a higher wind and solar energy potential. Finally, the magnitude of the RPS effect on residential electricity rates increases for utilities subject to higher requirements. The estimated elasticity of residential electricity rates with respect to an RPS requirement equals roughly 0.3.
|Date of creation:||Jun 2009|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Phone: (702) 895-3776|
Fax: (702) 895-1354
Web page: http://business.unlv.edu/econ/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Palmer, Karen & Burtraw, Dallas, 2005.
"Cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity policies,"
Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 873-894, November.
- Burtraw, Dallas & Palmer, Karen, 2005. "Cost-Effectiveness of Renewable Electricity Policies," Discussion Papers dp-05-01, Resources For the Future.
- Christopher R. Knittel, 2004. "Regulatory Restructuring and Incumbent Price Dynamics: The Case of U.S. Local Telephone Markets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 86(2), pages 614-625, May.
- Rose, Kenneth, 2004. "The State of Retail Electricity Markets in the U.S," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 26-36.
- Michaels, Robert J., 2008. "A National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Politically Correct, Economically Suspect," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 9-28, April.
- Kira R. Fabrizio & Nancy L. Rose & Catherine D. Wolfram, 2007.
"Do Markets Reduce Costs? Assessing the Impact of Regulatory Restructuring on US Electric Generation Efficiency,"
American Economic Review,
American Economic Association, vol. 97(4), pages 1250-1277, September.
- Kira Markiewicz & Nancy L. Rose & Catherine Wolfram, 2004. "Do Markets Reduce Costs? Assessing the Impact of Regulatory Restructuring on U.S. Electric Generation Efficiency," NBER Working Papers 11001, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Green, Richard & Newbery, David M G, 1991.
"Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
557, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Green, Richard J & Newbery, David M, 1992. "Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 100(5), pages 929-53, October.
- Hausman, Jerry, 2015.
"Specification tests in econometrics,"
Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS", vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
- Paul L. Joskow, 1997. "Restructuring, Competition and Regulatory Reform in the U.S. Electricity Sector," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 119-138, Summer.
- Fischer, Carolyn, 2006. "How Can Renewable Portfolio Standards Lower Electricity Prices?," Discussion Papers dp-06-20, Resources For the Future.
- Michael Greenstone & Ted Gayer, 2007.
"Quasi-Experimental and Experimental Approaches to Environmental Economics,"
0713, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.
- Greenstone, Michael & Gayer, Ted, 2009. "Quasi-experimental and experimental approaches to environmental economics," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 21-44, January.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nlv:wpaper:0923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bill Robinson)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.