IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Evaluation of the Transition to High-Value Agriculture Project in Moldova: Baseline Findings from the 2013-2014 Farm Operator Survey

Listed author(s):
  • Evan Borkum
  • Seth B. Morgan
  • Jane Fortson
  • Alexander Johann
  • Kenneth Fortson
Registered author(s):

    This report describes the baseline findings from the 2013-2014 Farm Operator Survey for the evaluation of the Transition to High-Value Agriculture Project in Moldova.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: https://www.mathematica-mpr.com/-/media/publications/pdfs/international/2016/moldova-agriculture-baseline-rpt.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Mathematica Policy Research in its series Mathematica Policy Research Reports with number 333d17defbb84cc4a30230e68f42d920.

    as
    in new window

    Length: 146
    Date of creation:
    Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:333d17defbb84cc4a30230e68f42d920
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications

    Fax: (609) 799-0005
    Web page: http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as
    in new window


    1. A. Colin Cameron & Jonah B. Gelbach & Douglas L. Miller, 2008. "Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 90(3), pages 414-427, August.
    2. Stephen G. Donald & Kevin Lang, 2007. "Inference with Difference-in-Differences and Other Panel Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 89(2), pages 221-233, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:333d17defbb84cc4a30230e68f42d920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joanne Pfleiderer)

    or (Joanne Lustig)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.