IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mnh/vpaper/1049.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Chancengleichheit, Statusmobilität und öffentliche Bildungsinvestitionen

Author

Listed:
  • Weizsäcker, Robert K. von

Abstract

Der Begriff der Chancengleichheit spielt eine maßgebliche Rolle in der wirtschafts- und finanzpolitischen Diskussion, findet regelmäßig Eingang in sozial- und bildungspolitische Reformvorhaben und erfreut sich als Kriterium einer staatlichen Politik der sozialen Gerechtigkeit breiter Akzeptanz. Dennoch ist weder klar, was unter Chancengleichheit exakt zu verstehen ist, noch gibt es einen Konsens über die gegebenenfalls zu ergreifenden Maßnahmen. Besonders deutlich wird dies im Bereich der Bildungspolitik. Öffentliche Bildungsinvestitionen üben als intergenerationelle Transfers großen Einfluß auf die Einkommenskorrelation zwischen den Generationen aus. Bildungspolitik stellt somit ein Bindeglied zwischen Chancengleichheit und intergenerationeller ökonomischer Mobilität dar. Dies eröffnet eine bisher wenig beachtete bildungs- und verteilungspolitische Perspektive, die über das statische Konzept der ökonomischen Ungleichheit hinausgeht. Es wird ein formales Modell entwickelt, das einige Kernaspekte des Begriffs der Chancengleichheit im Kontext der intergenerationellen Einkommensmobilität präzisiert. Prinzipielle Absicht ist es, die verbal geführte Auseinandersetzung um den Begriff der Chancengleichheit analytisch zu strukturieren und die Logik einiger aktueller Thesen auf dem Feld der Bildungspolitik zu hinterfragen.

Suggested Citation

  • Weizsäcker, Robert K. von, 1997. "Chancengleichheit, Statusmobilität und öffentliche Bildungsinvestitionen," Discussion Papers 557, Institut fuer Volkswirtschaftslehre und Statistik, Abteilung fuer Volkswirtschaftslehre.
  • Handle: RePEc:mnh:vpaper:1049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ub-madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/1049/1/557.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George J. Borjas, 1992. "Ethnic Capital and Intergenerational Mobility," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 107(1), pages 123-150.
    2. Thomas Piketty, 1995. "Social Mobility and Redistributive Politics," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 110(3), pages 551-584.
    3. Bowles, Samuel, 1973. "Understanding Unequal Economic Opportunity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 63(2), pages 346-356, May.
    4. Goldberger, Arthur S, 1989. "Economic and Mechanical Models of Intergenerational Transmission," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(3), pages 504-513, June.
    5. Corak, Miles & Heisz, Andrew, 1996. "The Intergenerational Income Mobility of Canadian Men," Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 1996089e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
    6. Gary S. Becker & Nigel Tomes, 1994. "Human Capital and the Rise and Fall of Families," NBER Chapters,in: Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education (3rd Edition), pages 257-298 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Solon, Gary, 1992. "Intergenerational Income Mobility in the United States," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(3), pages 393-408, June.
    8. Peters, H Elizabeth, 1992. "Patterns of Intergenerational Mobility in Income and Earnings," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 74(3), pages 456-466, August.
    9. Becker, Gary S & Tomes, Nigel, 1979. "An Equilibrium Theory of the Distribution of Income and Intergenerational Mobility," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 87(6), pages 1153-1189, December.
    10. Durlauf, Steven N, 1996. "A Theory of Persistent Income Inequality," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 75-93, March.
    11. A. B. Atkinson, 1981. "On Intergenerational Income Mobility in Britain," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 194-218, January.
    12. Zimmerman, David J, 1992. "Regression toward Mediocrity in Economic Stature," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 82(3), pages 409-429, June.
    13. Bjorklund, Anders & Jantti, Markus, 1997. "Intergenerational Income Mobility in Sweden Compared to the United States," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(5), pages 1009-1018, December.
    14. Conlisk, John, 1974. "Can Equalization of Opportunity Reduce Social Mobility?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 64(1), pages 80-90, March.
    15. Checchi, Daniele & Ichino, Andrea & Rustichini, Aldo, 1996. "More Equal but Less Mobile? Education Financing and Intergenerational Mobility in Italy and in the United States," CEPR Discussion Papers 1496, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. John Conlisk, 1984. "Four Invalid Propositions about Equality, Efficiency, and Intergenerational Transfers through Schooling," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 19(1), pages 3-21.
    17. Wolfgang HÄRDLE & J. MARRON & L. YANG, 1996. "Discussion," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 1996,65, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H52 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Education
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mnh:vpaper:1049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Katharina Rautenberg). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ivmande.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.