IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp17029.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Female Experts Face an Authority Gap? Evidence from Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Sievertsen, Hans Henrik

    (University of Bristol)

  • Smith, Sarah

    (University of Bristol)

Abstract

This paper reports results from a survey experiment comparing the effect of (the same) opinions expressed by male versus female experts. Members of the public were asked for their opinions on topical issues and shown the opinion of either a male or a female economist, all professors at leading US universities. We find, first, that experts can persuade members of the public - the opinions of individual expert economists have an effect on public opinion - and, second, that the opinions expressed by female economists are more persuasive than the same opinions expressed by male economists.

Suggested Citation

  • Sievertsen, Hans Henrik & Smith, Sarah, 2024. "Do Female Experts Face an Authority Gap? Evidence from Economics," IZA Discussion Papers 17029, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp17029.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heather Sarsons & Klarita Gërxhani & Ernesto Reuben & Arthur Schram, 2021. "Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(1), pages 101-147.
    2. J. Aislinn Bohren & Alex Imas & Michael Rosenberg, 2019. "The Dynamics of Discrimination: Theory and Evidence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(10), pages 3395-3436, October.
    3. Francesco D’Acunto & Andreas Fuster & Michael Weber, 2021. "Diverse Policy Committees Can Reach Underrepresented Groups," NBER Working Papers 29275, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 535-566.
    5. Marcella Alsan & Owen Garrick & Grant Graziani, 2019. "Does Diversity Matter for Health? Experimental Evidence from Oakland," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(12), pages 4071-4111, December.
    6. Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2023. "Designing Information Provision Experiments," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 3-40, March.
    7. Paola Sapienza & Luigi Zingales, 2013. "Economic Experts versus Average Americans," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(3), pages 636-642, May.
    8. Stefano DellaVigna & Matthew Gentzkow, 2010. "Persuasion: Empirical Evidence," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 643-669, September.
    9. Mathijs de Vaan & Toby Stuart, 2022. "Gender in the Markets for Expertise," American Sociological Review, , vol. 87(3), pages 443-477, June.
    10. Oscar Stolper & Andreas Walter, 2019. "Birds of a Feather: The Impact of Homophily on the Propensity to Follow Financial Advice," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 32(2), pages 524-563.
    11. Heather Sarsons & Guo Xu, 2021. "Confidence Men? Evidence on Confidence and Gender among Top Economists," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 111, pages 65-68, May.
    12. Markus Eberhardt & Giovanni Facchini & Valeria Rueda, 2023. "Gender Differences in Reference Letters: Evidence from the Economics Job Market," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(655), pages 2676-2708.
    13. Klein, Galit & Shtudiner, Zeev & Zwilling, Moti, 2021. "Uncovering gender bias in attitudes towards financial advisors," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 257-273.
    14. Roger Gordon & Gordon B. Dahl, 2013. "Views among Economists: Professional Consensus or Point-Counterpoint?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(3), pages 629-635, May.
    15. Boring, Anne, 2017. "Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 27-41.
    16. William D. Nordhaus & Douglas Rivers, 2023. "The People and the Experts," NBER Working Papers 31217, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. repec:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:8569-8574 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. William Nordhaus & Douglas Rivers, 2023. "The People and the Experts: Alternative Views on Economic Affairs," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2361, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    19. Ayalew, Shibiru & Manian, Shanthi & Sheth, Ketki, 2021. "Discrimination from below: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Margaret Samahita & Martina Zanella, 2025. "Confident, but Undervalued: Evidence from the Irish Economic Association Conference," Trinity Economics Papers tep0325, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics, revised Apr 2025.
    2. Gangadharan, Lata & Maitra, Pushkar & Vecci, Joseph & Veettil, Prakashan Chellattan & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2025. "Do Advisors’ Status and Identity Shape Adherence to Advice?," IZA Discussion Papers 18280, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margaret Samahita & Martina Zanella, 2025. "Confident, but Undervalued: Evidence from the Irish Economic Association Conference," Trinity Economics Papers tep0325, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics, revised Apr 2025.
    2. Niels Johannesen & Simon Muchardt, 2024. "Is the Bar Higher for Female Scholars? Evidence from Career Steps in Economics," CESifo Working Paper Series 11101, CESifo.
    3. Margaret Samahita & Kevin Devereux, 2024. "Are Economics Conferences Gender‐Neutral? Evidence from Ireland," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 86(1), pages 101-118, February.
    4. Ayllón, Sara, 2022. "Online teaching and gender bias," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. Ayllón, Sara & Lefgren, Lars & Patterson, Richard & Stoddard, Olga B. & Urdaneta, Nicolas, 2025. "‘Sorting’ Out Gender Discrimination and Disadvantage: Evidence from Student Evaluations of Teaching," IZA Discussion Papers 18040, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Baltrunaite, Audinga & Casarico, Alessandra & Rizzica, Lucia, 2025. "Women in economics: The role of gendered references at entry in the profession," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    7. Francesco D’Acunto & Andreas Fuster & Michael Weber, 2021. "Diverse Policy Committees Can Reach Underrepresented Groups," NBER Working Papers 29275, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Ryo Takahashi, 2022. "Gender differences in tolerance for women's opinions and the role of social norms," Working Papers 2123, Waseda University, Faculty of Political Science and Economics.
    9. Boumans, Dorine & Gründler, Klaus & Potrafke, Niklas & Ruthardt, Fabian, 2024. "Political leaders and macroeconomic expectations: Evidence from a global survey experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    10. Ayalew, Shibiru & Manian, Shanthi & Sheth, Ketki, 2021. "Discrimination from below: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    11. Peter Andre & Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2021. "Narratives about the Macroeconomy," CEBI working paper series 21-18, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    12. Judit Vall-Castello & Lídia Farré, 2025. "Promoting Female Talent in Science: Evidence from an Affirmative Action Policy," Working Papers 1478, Barcelona School of Economics.
    13. Abel, Martin & Bomfim, Emma & Cisneros, Izzy & Coyle, Jackson & Eraou, Song & Gebeyehu, Martha & Hernandez, Gerardo & Juantorena, Julian & Kaplan, Lizzy & Marquez, Danielle & Mullen, Jack & Mulhern, P, 2024. "Are women blamed more for giving incorrect financial advice?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    14. Peter Andrebriq & Carlo Pizzinelli & Christopher Roth & Johannes Wohlfart, 2022. "Subjective Models of the Macroeconomy: Evidence From Experts and Representative Samples," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(6), pages 2958-2991.
    15. Priyanka Chakraborty & Danila Serra, 2021. "Gender and leadership in organizations: Promotions, demotions and angry workers," Working Papers 20210104-001, Texas A&M University, Department of Economics.
    16. Erkal, Nisvan & Gangadharan, Lata & Koh, Boon Han, 2023. "Do women receive less blame than men? Attribution of outcomes in a prosocial setting," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 441-452.
    17. Martin Abel, 2024. "Do Workers Discriminate against Female Bosses?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 59(2), pages 470-501.
    18. Babin, J. Jobu & Hussey, Andrew, 2023. "Gender penalties and solidarity — Teaching evaluation differentials in and out of STEM," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    19. Nisvan Erkal & Lata Gangadharan & Boon Han Koh, 2021. "Gender Biases in Performance Evaluation: The Role of Beliefs Versus Outcomes," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2021-09, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    20. Ductor, Lorenzo & Prummer, Anja, 2024. "Gender homophily, collaboration, and output," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 477-492.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Holger Hinte (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.