IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/idb/brikps/13565.html

Does Reluctance to Share Personal Data Reduce Citizen Demand for Personalized Services? Evidence from a Survey Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Aguirre De Mora, Florencia
  • Roseth, Benjamin
  • Santamaria, Julieth

Abstract

Two seemingly contradictory trends have accompanied the rise of digital transformation: a demand for better and more customized services, which require the use of personal data, and a concern for data protection. How do we reconcile these divergent trends? The answer to this question may influence not only the design of personalized services but also the strategies for their widespread adoption. This study explores how to mitigate the impact of citizens reluctance to share data on the uptake of personalized public services. Through a survey experiment, we offered two hypothetical personalized services: one educational service (a scholarship) and one health-related service (a checkup). Each respondent was randomly assigned to one of three possible intervention groups, receiving different types of information: (i) a summary outlining the service benefits; (ii) details on benefits with a data usage disclosure; and (iii) a data usage disclosure. The findings reveal that citizens exhibit a strong baseline interest in personalized services. However, a requirement to share personal data had an adverse impact on interest in both the educational and health-related services, resulting in declines of 2.6 to 3.0 percentage points. There are indications that the decrease in interest may be more pronounced for the health service. Providing detailed service descriptions increased interest by 4.5 and 5.5 percentage points for education and health services, respectively. This suggests that offering information about the benefits of the service can offset concerns about data privacy. These effects remained consistent among different population groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Aguirre De Mora, Florencia & Roseth, Benjamin & Santamaria, Julieth, 2024. "Does Reluctance to Share Personal Data Reduce Citizen Demand for Personalized Services? Evidence from a Survey Experiment," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13565, Inter-American Development Bank.
    • Handle: RePEc:idb:brikps:13565
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0012990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Does-Reluctance-to-Share-Personal-Data-Reduce-Citizen-Demand-for-Personalized-Services-Evidence-from-a-Survey-Experiment.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0012990?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armin Falk & James J. Heckman, 2009. "Lab Experiments are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences," Working Papers 200935, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    2. Tamara Dinev & Massimo Bellotto & Paul Hart & Vincenzo Russo & Ilaria Serra & Christian Colautti, 2006. "Privacy calculus model in e-commerce – a study of Italy and the United States," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 389-402, August.
    3. Beresford, Alastair R. & Kübler, Dorothea & Preibusch, Sören, 2012. "Unwillingness to pay for privacy: A field experiment," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 25-27.
    4. Athina Ioannou & Iis Tussyadiah & Graham Miller & Shujun Li & Mario Weick, 2021. "Privacy nudges for disclosure of personal information: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-29, August.
    5. -, 2022. "Capital flows to Latin America and the Caribbean: A slowdown in 2022," Oficina de la CEPAL en Washington (Estudios e Investigaciones) 48572, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    6. Omar Al-Ubaydli & John List, 2012. "On the Generalizability of Experimental Results in Economics," Artefactual Field Experiments 00467, The Field Experiments Website.
    7. Jeffrey T. Prince & Scott Wallsten, 2022. "How much is privacy worth around the world and across platforms?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 841-861, November.
    8. Phillip Keefer & Carlos Scartascini, 2022. "Trust, Social Cohesion, and Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Book Chapters), in: Phillip Keefer & Carlos Scartascini (ed.), Trust: The Key to Social Cohesion and Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean, edition 1, chapter 1, pages 1-26, Inter-American Development Bank.
    9. -, 2022. "Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean 2022," La Inversión Extranjera Directa en América Latina y el Caribe, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 48521 edited by Eclac.
    10. Avi Goldfarb & Verina F. Que, 2023. "The Economics of Digital Privacy," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 15(1), pages 267-286, September.
    11. Martínez Villarreal, Déborah & Parilli, Cristina & Rojas Méndez, Ana María & Scartascini, Carlos & Simpser, Alberto, 2021. "Do You Have COVID-19?: How to Increase the Use of Diagnostic and Contact-Tracing Apps," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 11121, Inter-American Development Bank.
    12. Alessandro Acquisti & Curtis Taylor & Liad Wagman, 2016. "The Economics of Privacy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 442-492, June.
    13. Phillip Keefer & Carlos Scartascini, 2022. "Trust, Social Cohesion, and Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Book Chapters), in: Phillip Keefer & Carlos Scartascini (ed.), Trust: The Key to Social Cohesion and Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean, edition 1, chapter 1, pages 1-26, Inter-American Development Bank.
    14. Tamara Dinev & Paul Hart, 2006. "An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 61-80, March.
    15. Susan Athey & Christian Catalini & Catherine Tucker, 2017. "The Digital Privacy Paradox: Small Money, Small Costs, Small Talk," NBER Working Papers 23488, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Reyes, Angela & Roseth, Benjamin & Vera-Cossio, Diego A., 2021. "Technology, Identification, and Access to Social Programs: Experimental Evidence from Panama," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 11535, Inter-American Development Bank.
    17. Viviana Celli, 2022. "Causal mediation analysis in economics: Objectives, assumptions, models," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 214-234, February.
    18. Keefer, Philip & Scartascini, Carlos, 2022. "Trust: The Key to Social Cohesion and Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 11771.
    19. Gallegos, Sebastian & Roseth, Benjamin & Cuesta, Ana & Sánchez, Mario, 2023. "Increasing the take-up of public health services: An at-scale experiment on digital government," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiadong Gu, 2024. "Data Trade and Consumer Privacy," Papers 2406.12457, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    2. Biener, Christian & Eling, Martin & Lehmann, Martin, 2020. "Balancing the desire for privacy against the desire to hedge risk," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 608-620.
    3. Jeffrey T. Prince & Scott Wallsten, 2022. "How much is privacy worth around the world and across platforms?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 841-861, November.
    4. Te Bao & John Duffy & Nobuyuki Hanaki, 2024. "Paying to Avoid the Spotlight," ISER Discussion Paper 1238, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    5. Olivier Armantier & Sebastian Doerr & Jon Frost & Andreas Fuster & Kelly Shue, 2024. "Nothing to hide? Gender and age differences in willingness to share data," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 24-99, Swiss Finance Institute.
    6. Leopoldo Fergusson, 2025. "Colombia’s Missing Fiscal Pact: The Political and Cultural Foundations of Weak Taxation," Documentos CEDE 2025-39, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    7. Altube, Matias Guizzo & Scartascini, Carlos & Tommasi, Mariano, 2023. "The political economy of redistribution and (in)efficiency in Latin America and the Caribbean," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120678, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Helia Marreiros & Mirco Tonin & Michael Vlassopoulos & M.C. Schraefel, 2016. "“Now that you mention it”: A Survey Experiment on Information, Salience and Online Privacy," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS34, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    9. Bleier, Alexander & Goldfarb, Avi & Tucker, Catherine, 2020. "Consumer privacy and the future of data-based innovation and marketing," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 466-480.
    10. Busso, Matias & Ibáñez, Ana María & Messina, Julián & Quigua, Juliana, 2023. "Preferences for redistribution in Latin America," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120687, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Heiny, Friederike & Li, Tianchi & Tolksdorf, Michel, 2025. "We value your privacy: Behavior-based pricing under endogenous privacy," VfS Annual Conference 2025 (Cologne): Revival of Industrial Policy 325415, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Syngjoo Choi & Bongseop Kim & Young Sik Kim & Ohik Kwon, 2025. "Central Bank Digital Currency And Privacy: A Randomized Survey Experiment," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 66(2), pages 823-847, May.
    13. Morlok, Tina & Matt, Christian & Hess, Thomas, 2017. "Privatheitsforschung in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften: Entwicklung, Stand und Perspektiven," Working Papers 1/2017, University of Munich, Munich School of Management, Institute for Information Systems and New Media.
    14. Nicole Jonker & Hans Brits, 2025. "Rational disclosure or privacy paradox? Consumer data-sharing in financial app ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Guy Aridor & Rafael Jiménez-Durán & Ro'ee Levy & Lena Song, 2024. "The Economics of Social Media," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(4), pages 1422-1474, December.
    16. Nam, Sangjun & Kwon, Youngsun, 2024. "Is pay-or-consent for privacy justifiable? Evidence from different users' privacy attitudes toward behavioral data collection in South Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7).
    17. Freddi, Eleonora & Wasenden, Ole Christian, 2024. "Privacy during pandemics: Attitudes to public use of personal data," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    18. Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2025. "Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for data privacy in automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Paliński, Michał & Jusypenko, Bartosz & Hardy, Wojciech, 2025. "Behind the screens. Privacy and advertising preferences in VoD —the role of privacy concerns, persuasion knowledge, and experience," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    20. Hamid Reza Nikkhah & Frederic Schlackl & Rajiv Sabherwal, 2025. "Does Culture Affect Post-Adoption Privacy Concerns of Mobile Cloud Computing App Users? Insights from the US, the UK, and India," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 2059-2080, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
    • D90 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - General
    • H41 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Public Goods
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idb:brikps:13565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Felipe Herrera Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iadbbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.