IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eid/wpaper/58181.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Maternity leave take-up in UK academia. Why are they hurrying back?

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Clifton-Sprigg

    (University of Bath)

  • Eleonora Fichera

    (University of Bath)

  • Simona Bejenariu Tudor

    (Stockholm University)

Abstract

In this paper we explore the effects of terms of maternity leave policy on the duration of leave taken by mothers, focusing on the higher education sector in the United Kingdom, where there is a wide variation in financial coverage of the packages offered by employers. We use unique newly collected individual level data for over 13,000 academic and professional services staff at Higher Education Institutions (HEI) in the UK and add to it data on university characteristics from the Higher Education Statistics Agency and area-level characteristics from the Office for National Statistics. Using an instrumental variable approach, we find that on average academics take 2 additional weeks of leave for every additional week of full pay provided within the maternity leave package, when professional services staff take 2.7 additional weeks. Academics respond positively to the financial terms of the policy in departments with a lower proportion of teaching-only contracts, higher proportion of female employees and in institutions with above median generosity of the maternity leave package. These results may suggest the culture, research and teaching environment within

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Clifton-Sprigg & Eleonora Fichera & Simona Bejenariu Tudor, 2023. "Maternity leave take-up in UK academia. Why are they hurrying back?," Department of Economics Working Papers 97/23, University of Bath, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:eid:wpaper:58181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/files/275338190/CliftonSpriggFicheraTudor_2023.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eid:wpaper:58181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Scholarly Communications Librarian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/debatuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.