IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/139007.html

The effects of the reform of the judicial map on the functioning of civil justice

Author

Listed:
  • Mocetti, Sauro
  • Pesenti, Ottavia
  • Roma, Giacomo

Abstract

The paper evaluates the impact of the reform of the judicial map on the functioning of Italian civil justice. Implemented between 2013 and 2014, the reform abolished all branch offices and merged several small first-instance courts, substantially increasing the size of judicial districts and the scale at which civil justice services are provided. According to our findings, the reform led to a reduction in the demand for justice, plausibly due to higher access costs associated with increased distances to the courts. This decline was particularly pronounced in case types characterized by greater claimant discretion and lower expected stakes. On the supply side, the reform increased the number of cases resolved and reduced their average duration. These improvements were more pronounced in initially less efficient courts and in more complex case types, which benefited the most from the increased scale and specialization.

Suggested Citation

  • Mocetti, Sauro & Pesenti, Ottavia & Roma, Giacomo, 2026. "The effects of the reform of the judicial map on the functioning of civil justice," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 139007, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:139007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://researchonline.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/139007/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Voigt, 2016. "Determinants of judicial efficiency: a survey," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 183-208, October.
    2. Decio Coviello & Andrea Ichino & Nicola Persico, 2019. "Measuring the Gains from Labor Specialization," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 62(3), pages 403-426.
    3. Jappelli, Tullio & Pagano, Marco & Bianco, Magda, 2005. "Courts and Banks: Effects of Judicial Enforcement on Credit Markets," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(2), pages 223-244, April.
    4. La Porta, Rafael & Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes & Andrei Shleifer & Robert W. Vishny, 1997. "Legal Determinants of External Finance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(3), pages 1131-1150, July.
    5. Dmitry Arkhangelsky & Susan Athey & David A. Hirshberg & Guido W. Imbens & Stefan Wager, 2021. "Synthetic Difference-in-Differences," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(12), pages 4088-4118, December.
    6. Silvia Giacomelli & Carlo Menon, 2017. "Does weak contract enforcement affect firm size? Evidence from the neighbour’s court," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(6), pages 1251-1282.
    7. Reingewertz, Yaniv, 2012. "Do municipal amalgamations work? Evidence from municipalities in Israel," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 240-251.
    8. Stephen Knack & Philip Keefer, 1995. "Institutions And Economic Performance: Cross‐Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(3), pages 207-227, November.
    9. Per J. Agrell & Pontus Mattsson & Jonas Månsson, 2020. "Impacts on efficiency of merging the Swedish district courts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(2), pages 653-679, May.
    10. Giulia Canzian & Antonella Rita Ferrara, 2025. "Judicial Reform and Banks Credit Risk Exposure," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 87(2), pages 414-447, April.
    11. Blesse, Sebastian & Baskaran, Thushyanthan, 2016. "Do municipal mergers reduce costs? Evidence from a German federal state," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 54-74.
    12. Massimo Finocchiaro Castro & Calogero Guccio, 2018. "Measuring Potential Efficiency Gains from Mergers of Italian First Instance Courts through Nonparametric Model," Public Finance Review, , vol. 46(1), pages 83-116, January.
    13. Omar Bamieh & Decio Coviello & Andrea Ichino & Nicola Persico, 2025. "Effect of Business Uncertainty on Turnover," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(2), pages 319-348.
    14. Veda Narasimhan & Jeffrey Weaver, 2024. "Polity Size and Local Government Performance: Evidence from India," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(11), pages 3385-3426, November.
    15. Vincenzo Pezone, 2023. "The Real Effects of Judicial Enforcement," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 27(3), pages 889-933.
    16. Chappe, Nathalie & Obidzinski, Marie, 2014. "The impact of the number of courts on the demand for trials," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 121-125.
    17. Giacomo Rodano, 2021. "Judicial efficiency and bank credit to firms," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1322, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    18. Mocetti, Sauro & Pesenti, Ottavia & Roma, Giacomo, 2025. "Measuring office productivity: A model accounting for the dependence of outflows on inflows," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    19. Knack, Stephen & Keefer, Philip, 1995. "Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Indicators," MPRA Paper 23118, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Duncombe, William & Yinger, John, 1993. "An analysis of returns to scale in public production, with an application to fire protection," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 49-72, August.
    21. Marciano, Alain & Melcarne, Alessandro & Ramello, Giovanni B., 2019. "The economic importance of judicial institutions, their performance and the proper way to measure them," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 81-98, February.
    22. Alain Marciano & Alessandro Melcarne & Giovanni Battista Ramello, 2019. "The economic importance of judicial institutions, their performance and the proper way to measure them," Post-Print hal-02005900, HAL.
    23. Blom-Hansen, Jens & Houlberg, Kurt & Serritzlew, Søren & Treisman, Daniel, 2016. "Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Policy Expenditure: Assessing the Effect of Municipal Amalgamation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 110(4), pages 812-831, November.
    24. Cirulli, Vanessa & Marini, Giorgia & Marini, Marco A. & Straume, Odd Rune, 2025. "Do hospital mergers reduce waiting times? Theory and evidence from the English NHS," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    25. George L. Priest & Benjamin Klein, 1984. "The Selection of Disputes for Litigation," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 13(1), pages 1-56, January.
    26. Juan Luis Gómez‐Reino & Santiago Lago‐Peñas & Jorge Martinez‐Vazquez, 2023. "Evidence on economies of scale in local public service provision: A meta‐analysis," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(4), pages 793-819, September.
    27. Romain Espinosa & Claudine Desrieux & Hengrui Wan, 2017. "Fewer courts, less justice? Evidence from the 2008 French reform of labor courts," Post-Print halshs-01634211, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Daria Denti & Marco Di Cataldo, 2026. "Justice Efficiency and Crime Deterrence," Working Papers 2026: 06, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    3. Tommaso Giommoni & Luigi Guiso & Claudio Michelacci & Massimo Morelli, 2025. "The Economic Costs of Ambiguous Laws," CESifo Working Paper Series 11929, CESifo.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daria Denti & Marco Di Cataldo, 2026. "Justice Efficiency and Crime Deterrence," Working Papers 2026: 06, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    2. Sila Mishra, 2023. "‘Cyclic syndrome’ of arrears and efficiency of Indian judiciary," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Inmaculada Aguiar‐Díaz & Ewelina Monica Mruk & María Victoria Ruiz‐Mallorquí, 2024. "Judicial efficiency, debt structure, and cost of debt," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(6), pages 3541-3563, September.
    4. Lucia Errico & Andrea Mosca & Sandro Rondinella, 2023. "University-Court Proximity: What are the effects on the legal system performance?," Regional Economy, , vol. 7(Q1), pages 21-33.
    5. Xin Zhang & Decai Tang & Xiejun Cheng, 2025. "The inverted U-shaped relationship between judicial development and economic growth: evidence from China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Giuseppe Vita & Paolo Lorenzo Ferrara & Alessandra Patti, 2025. "Analysis of time duration of civil disputes in Italy: a case study with microdata from Sicilian courts," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(1), pages 1-30, March.
    7. Mendoza, Ronald U. & Canare, Tristan A. & Ang, Alvin, 2015. "Doing Business: A Review of Literature and Its Role in APEC 2015," Research Paper Series DP 2015-37, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    8. Khalid Sekkat & Pierre-Guillaume Méon, 2015. "The formal and informal institutional framework of capital accumulation," Post-Print CEB, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, August.
    9. Umberto Nizza, 2023. "The expertise effect: the impact of legal specialists’ intervention on the timely delivery of laymen's judgments," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(2), pages 589-614, July.
    10. Giacalone, Massimiliano & Nissi, Eugenia & Cusatelli, Carlo, 2020. "Dynamic efficiency evaluation of Italian judicial system using DEA based Malmquist productivity indexes," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Giulia Canzian & Antonella Rita Ferrara, 2021. "Judicial Efficiency and Banks Credit Risk Exposure," CESifo Working Paper Series 8930, CESifo.
    12. Alessandro Sovera, 2025. "When Integration Backfires: Examining the Effects of Mandatory Inter-Municipal Cooperation on Local Housing Markets," Working Papers 40, Finnish Centre of Excellence in Tax Systems Research.
    13. Shah, Muhammad Hashim & Xiao, Zuoping & Abdullah, & Quresh, Shakir & Ahmad, Mushtaq, 2020. "Internal pyramid structure, contract enforcement, minority investor protection, and firms’ performance: Evidence from emerging economies," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    14. Ang, Alvin & Mendoza, Ronald U. & Canare, Tristan A., 2015. "Doing Business: A Review of Literature and Its Role in APEC 2015," Discussion Papers DP 2015-37, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    15. Samantha Bielen & Peter Grajzl & Wim Marneffe, 2017. "Understanding the Time to Court Case Resolution: A Competing Risks Analysis Using Belgian Data," CESifo Working Paper Series 6450, CESifo.
    16. Masayoshi Hayashi & Takafumi Suzuki, 2018. "Municipal Mergers and Capitalization: Evaluating the Heisei Territorial Reform in Japan," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-1105, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    17. Belarouci, Matthieu & Vaillant, Nicolas & Wolff, François-Charles, 2024. "Did the French reform of the judicial map affect conciliation activities?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Miloš Božović, 2021. "Judicial efficiency and loan performance: micro evidence from Serbia," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 33-56, August.
    19. Falavigna, G. & Ippoliti, R. & Ramello, G.B., 2025. "Financial constraints, institutional quality and import trade flows: An empirical investigation on Italian manufacturing SMEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(4).
    20. Giuseppe Arcuri & Nadine Levratto & Marianna Succurro, 2023. "Does commercial court organisation affect firms’ bankruptcy rate? evidence from the french judicial reform," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 573-601, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:139007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.