An alleged weakness of heuristic optimisation methods is the stochastic character of their solutions. That is, instead of finding a truly optimal solution, they only provide a stochastic approximation of this optimum. In this paper we look into a particular application, portfolio optimisation. We demonstrate two points: firstly, the randomness of the ‘optimal’ solution obtained from the algorithm can be made so small that for all practical purposes it can be neglected. Secondly, and more importantly, we show that the remaining randomness is swamped by the uncertainty coming from the data. In particular, we show that as a result of the bad conditioning of the problem, minor changes in the solution lead to economically meaningful changes in the solution’s out-of-sample performance. The relationship between in-sample fit and out-of-sample performance is not monotonous, but still, we observe that up to a point better solutions in-sample lead to better solutions out-of-sample. Beyond this point, however, there is practically no more cause for improving the solution any further, since any improvement will only lead to unpredictable changes (noise) out-of-sample.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Manfred Gilli & Evis Këllezi & Hilda Hysi, .
"A Data-Driven Optimization Heuristic for Downside Risk Minimization,"
Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series
06-02, Swiss Finance Institute.
- M. Gilli & E. Kellezi & H. Hysi, 2006. "A Data-Driven Optimization Heuristic for Downside Risk Minimization," Computing in Economics and Finance 2006 355, Society for Computational Economics.
- Moshe Leshno & Haim Levy, 2002. "Preferred by "All" and Preferred by "Most" Decision Makers: Almost Stochastic Dominance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1074-1085, August.
- Bertsimas, Dimitris & Lauprete, Geoffrey J. & Samarov, Alexander, 2004. "Shortfall as a risk measure: properties, optimization and applications," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 28(7), pages 1353-1381, April.
- Manfred GILLI & Enrico SCHUMANN, 2009. "An Empirical Analysis of Alternative Portfolio Selection Criteria," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 09-06, Swiss Finance Institute.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:com:wpaper:010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Anil Khuman)The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Anil Khuman to update the entry or send us the correct address
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.