IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_12791.html

Modern Difference-in-Differences, Same Old Answer: What Event-Study Estimates Really Tell Us About the Effects of Minimum Wages on Jobs

Author

Listed:
  • David Neumark
  • Antonio Rodriguez-Lopez

Abstract

Two prominent publications in the recent minimum wage literature argue that estimation of the employment effects of minimum wages should use "clean" event-study designs, and that doing so leads to the conclusion that minimum wages have very limited, if any, effects on employment. We explore the use of event-study designs in this context, using the event-study stacked design of Cengiz, Dube, Lindner and Zipperer (2019a) and the related local projections difference-in-differences approach in Dube and Lindner (2024), along with their same data sources and period coverage. We generally find negative and significant employment effects of minimum wages in the United States, both overall and - more strongly - in the restaurant industry. The null results in these two papers are fragile and depend critically on a number of choices regarding variables, events, sample definitions, and weighting; they are not attributable to using an event-study design.

Suggested Citation

  • David Neumark & Antonio Rodriguez-Lopez, 2026. "Modern Difference-in-Differences, Same Old Answer: What Event-Study Estimates Really Tell Us About the Effects of Minimum Wages on Jobs," CESifo Working Paper Series 12791, CESifo.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp12791.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand
    • J38 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_12791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.