IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cep/cepdps/dp2177.html

Sentencing severity, victim behaviour, and the prevention of domestic violence

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Costa
  • Olivia Masi
  • Beatriz Ribeiro
  • Matteo Sandi

Abstract

Can harsher criminal sanctions reduce violence inside intimate relationships? We study Brazil's 2015 Femicide Law, which reclassified femicide as a heinous crime and raised expected penalties for gender-based killings. Using ten years of linked administrative records for the universe of individuals in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, we compare women born in municipalities with different pre-reform exposure to men with a history of violence against women. We find that the reform reduced domestic violence, with effects concentrated in serious non-fatal offences: bodily injuries, threats, and fighting. The decline does not appear to be explained by reporting changes or incapacitation. Instead, the evidence points to deterrence reinforced by victims' use of the state: after the reform, women requested protective measures more often and did so earlier in the sequence of abuse. The results show that criminal law can reduce domestic violence before the fatal margin, not only by threatening offenders, but by making protection a more credible option for victims.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Costa & Olivia Masi & Beatriz Ribeiro & Matteo Sandi, 2026. "Sentencing severity, victim behaviour, and the prevention of domestic violence," CEP Discussion Papers dp2177, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
  • Handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp2177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp2177.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp2177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cep.lse.ac.uk/_new/publications/discussion-papers/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.