IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cel/dpaper/55.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Enhancing the Effectiveness of Social Dialogue Articulation in Europe: Conceptual and Analytical Framework in a Multi-Level Governance Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Kahancová
  • Monika Martišková
  • Carl Nordlund

Abstract

This paper elaborates a conceptual and analytical framework to study social dialogue articulation and its effectiveness in the EU. The framework derives from a multi-level governance perspective that seeks to account for the diversity of state and non-state actors involved at various levels of social dialogue. Effectiveness of social dialogue is conceptualized as the ability of social dialogue committees to deliver specific outcomes, while the effectiveness of social dialogue articulation in conceptualized as the ability to transpose social dialogue outcomes achieved at one level of social dialogue to another level of social dialogue and to implement EU-level social dialogue outcomes in nationally specific institutional and legislative conditions of diverse EU members states. The framework for analysis also includes three interrelated methodological suggestions for empirical study, including a quantitative survey among social partners, qualitative interviews for in-depth insights as well as network analysis in order to identify strong ties between involved actors that inform expectations on effective articulation of social dialogue between national and EU-level social dialogue structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Kahancová & Monika Martišková & Carl Nordlund, 2019. "Enhancing the Effectiveness of Social Dialogue Articulation in Europe: Conceptual and Analytical Framework in a Multi-Level Governance Perspective," Discussion Papers 55, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    • Handle: RePEc:cel:dpaper:55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://celsi.sk/media/discussion_papers/DP55.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenworthy, Lane. & Kittel, Bernhard., 2003. "Indicators of social dialogue : concepts and measurements," ILO Working Papers 993631843402676, International Labour Organization.
    2. repec:ilo:ilowps:363184 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Colin Hay, 2009. "King Canute and the ‘Problem’ of Structure and Agency: On Times, Tides and Heresthetics," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(2), pages 260-279, June.
    4. Klaus Doerre & Hajo Holst & Oliver Nachtwey, 2009. "Organizing – A Strategic Option for Trade Union Renewal?," International Journal of Action Research, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 5(1), pages 33-67.
    5. Colin Hay, 2009. "King Canute and the 'Problem' of Structure and Agency: On Times, Tides and Heresthetics," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57, pages 260-279, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akg��, Mehtap & Baiocco, Sara, 2019. "Comparative policy recommendations on improving social dialogue articulation and effectiveness in Europe," CEPS Papers 25974, Centre for European Policy Studies.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nigel Pleasants, 2009. "Structure, Agency and Ontological Confusion: A Response to Hay," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(4), pages 885-891, December.
    2. Wolfgang Ochel, 2009. "Employment Protection: Concepts and Measurement," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 7(02), pages 30-38, July.
    3. repec:ces:ifodic:v:3:y:2005:i:4:p:14567599 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Colin Hay, 2009. "Your Ontology, My Ontic Speculations ... On the Importance of Showing One's (Ontological) Working," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(4), pages 892-898, December.
    5. Mia Mahmudur RAHIM & Sk Samidul ISLAM, 2020. "Freedom of association in the Bangladeshi garment industry: A policy schizophrenia in labour regulation," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(3), pages 423-446, September.
    6. Wolfgang Ochel, 2005. "Concepts and Measurement of Labour Market Institutions," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 3(04), pages 40-55, January.
    7. Tzehainesh TEKLÈ, 2021. "Delving into the past – Looking to the future," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 160(4), pages 12-31, December.
    8. Simms, Melanie & Eversberg, Dennis & Dupuy, Camille & Hipp, Lena, 2018. "Organizing Young Workers Under Precarious Conditions: What Hinders or Facilitates Union Success," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 45(4), pages 420-450.
    9. Marco Marrone & Paolo Borghi, 2023. "Ai margini del sindacato, il sindacato nei margini: democratizzazione, demercificazione e disinquinamento tra alleanze possibili e nuove pratiche," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(3), pages 35-52.
    10. Barbara Samaluk & Kairit Kall, 2023. "Trade union project-based revitalization strategies in Central and Eastern Europe: The Case of Slovenia and Estonia," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 29(1), pages 7-24, March.
    11. Wolfgang Ochel, 2005. "Concepts and Measurement of Labour Market Institutions," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 3(4), pages 40-55, 01.
    12. Nada Matta, 2024. "Public Workers’ Mobilizations in Egypt: Perceptions of Sector Potential in Textile and Transport," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(1), pages 62-87, January.
    13. Dong-One Kim & Yoon-Ho Kim & Paula Voos & Hiromasa Suzuki & Young Doo Kim, 2015. "Evaluating Industrial Relations Systems of OECD Countries from 1993 to 2005: A Two-Dimensional Approach," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(4), pages 645-663, December.
    14. Kota Kitagawa & Arata Uemura, 2015. "General statutory minimum wage debate in Germany: Degrees of political intervention in collective bargaining autonomy," Discussion papers e-14-015, Graduate School of Economics Project Center, Kyoto University.
    15. repec:ces:ifodic:v:7:y:2009:i:2:p:14567123 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Mária Sedláková & Mykhailo Slukvin & Monika Martišková, 2020. "Trade unions and professional associations as civil society actors working on the issues of labour rights and social dialogue in Ukraine," Research Reports 39, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    17. Wolfgang Ochel, 2009. "Employment Protection: Concepts and Measurement," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 7(2), pages 30-38, 07.
    18. Marta Kahancová & Monika Martišková, 2023. "Strengthening legislation, weakening collective bargaining? Two faces of trade union strategies in Czechia and Slovakia," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 29(1), pages 63-81, March.
    19. Lisa Dorigatti, 2014. "Organizzare i non organizzati," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 129-141.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social dialogue; articulation; EU-level social dialogue; multi-level governance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J08 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - Labor Economics Policies
    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General
    • J51 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - Trade Unions: Objectives, Structure, and Effects
    • J81 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Standards - - - Working Conditions
    • P52 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Comparative Economic Systems - - - Comparative Studies of Particular Economies
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cel:dpaper:55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Martin Kahanec (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/celsisk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.