IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/bocoec/1094.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Disclosing Effort in Dynamic Team Contests with Effort Complementarity

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Arbatskaya

    (Emory University)

  • Hideo Konishi

    (Boston College)

Abstract

This paper studies strategic effort disclosure in dynamic team contests. Two teams of two players compete in a Tullock contest with teammates' sequential efforts aggregated across two periods using a Cobb-Douglas production function. We examine how equilibrium efforts and winning probabilities are affected by the teams' communication policies: no communication, private communication (efforts shared internally with stage-2 teammates), and public communication (efforts disclosed to stage-2 rivals as well. To describe asymmetric information generated by privately observable efforts for each communication policy profile, we use perfect Bayesian equilibrium with an appropriate belief refinement for multi-stage complete information games. In the unique positive-effort equilibrium,the optimal choice of a communication strategy dff§ers for the favorite (the strong team) and the underdog (the weak team). Private communication only benefits the underdog team, fostering effort complementarity and improving their chances of winning and payoffs. In contrast, the favorite team prefers either public or no communication to deter rival efforts or avoid intra-team free-riding. Importantly,endogenous communication policies reshape competitive dynamics, with private disclosure of efforts serving as a strategic equalizer for weaker teams.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Arbatskaya & Hideo Konishi, 2025. "Disclosing Effort in Dynamic Team Contests with Effort Complementarity," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 1094, Boston College Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:boc:bocoec:1094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/EC-P/wp1094.pdf
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:bocoec:1094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/debocus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.