IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2605.25438.html

Agentic Delegation and the Language Frontier of Software Developers: A Model and Evidence from Claude Code on GitHub

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Quispe
  • Kevin Xu

Abstract

We develop and test a model of agentic delegation in software production. Developers face language-specific entry thresholds; conversational AI mainly augments work in languages they already know, while agentic AI adds delegated execution under developer specification and verification. The model predicts an activation band of unfamiliar languages that become feasible only with an agent, expanding the observed language-production frontier of the developer. We test this prediction in a monthly GitHub panel of 5,346 developers, dating adoption by first Claude Code co-authorship and constructing commit-level language outcomes from 57 million changed files. Doubly robust staggered-adoption event studies with not-yet-treated comparisons show sharp expansion at adoption: active languages rise by 2.5 relative to a 0.9 baseline, newly used languages by 1.2, entropy by 0.38, and cumulative breadth continues to grow afterward. The pattern survives removing the treatment-defining language, excluding all Claude-coauthored commits, conditioning on activity, and screening users of competing agents. Consistent with the model, first uses of unfamiliar languages concentrate among narrow pre-adoption specialists at each activity level. Because adoption is voluntary and may coincide with project shocks, the estimates are event-time associations rather than definitive causal effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Quispe & Kevin Xu, 2026. "Agentic Delegation and the Language Frontier of Software Developers: A Model and Evidence from Claude Code on GitHub," Papers 2605.25438, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.25438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.25438
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2019. "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 3-30, Spring.
    2. Goodman-Bacon, Andrew, 2021. "Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 254-277.
    3. Clément de Chaisemartin & Xavier D'Haultfœuille, 2020. "Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(9), pages 2964-2996, September.
    4. Erik Brynjolfsson & Danielle Li & Lindsey Raymond, 2025. "Generative AI at Work," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(2), pages 889-942.
    5. Kirill Borusyak & Xavier Jaravel & Jann Spiess, 2024. "Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(6), pages 3253-3285.
    6. Bresnahan, Timothy F. & Trajtenberg, M., 1995. "General purpose technologies 'Engines of growth'?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 83-108, January.
    7. Patrick Bolton & Christopher Harris, 1999. "Strategic Experimentation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 67(2), pages 349-374, March.
    8. Drew Fudenberg & David K. Levine, 1998. "The Theory of Learning in Games," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262061945, December.
    9. Jovanovic, Boyan & Nyarko, Yaw, 1996. "Learning by Doing and the Choice of Technology," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 64(6), pages 1299-1310, November.
    10. Sun, Liyang & Abraham, Sarah, 2021. "Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 175-199.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ozge Demirci & Jonas Hannane & Xinrong Zhu, 2024. "Who Is AI Replacing? The Impact of Generative AI on Online Freelancing Platforms," CESifo Working Paper Series 11276, CESifo.
    2. Hahm, Dong Woo, 2026. "From curriculum to career: Early-career labor market effects of the Common Core," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Li, Daiyue & Jin, Yanhong & Cheng, Mingwang, 2024. "Unleashing the power of industrial robotics on firm productivity: Evidence from China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 500-520.
    4. Brehm, Johannes & Pestel, Nico & Schaffner, Sandra & Schmitz, Laura, 2025. "From Low Emission Zone to academic track: Environmental policy effects on educational achievement in elementary school," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Hu, Changyu & Zhao, Qicheng & Ma, Ruiyun & Yin, Yugang, 2025. "Civil recognition and urban entrepreneurship: Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1395-1414.
    6. Coraggio, Luca & Pagano, Marco & Scognamiglio, Annalisa & Tåg, Joacim, 2025. "JAQ of all trades: Job mismatch, firm productivity and managerial quality," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    7. Burton, Anne M. & Churchill, Brandyn F., 2025. "Supply-side opioid restrictions and the retail pharmacy market," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    8. Martin Huber & Sarina Joy Oberhansli, 2026. "Difference-in-differences for mediation analysis using double machine learning," Papers 2602.23877, arXiv.org.
    9. Padilla-Romo, María & Peluffo, Cecilia & Viollaz, Mariana, 2025. "Parents’ effective time endowment and divorce: Evidence from extended school days," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    10. Huang, Wei & Luo, Mi & Ta, Yuqi & Wang, Boxian, 2024. "Land expropriation, household behaviors, and health outcomes: Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    11. Li, Pei & Liu, Kaihao & Lu, Yi & Peng, Lu, 2025. "Organizing regulatory structure and local air quality: Evidence from the environmental vertical management reform in China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 139-164.
    12. Kang, Yankun & Liu, Ruiming & Yang, Bingyan, 2025. "Bridging the ivory tower and industry: How university science parks promote university-industry collaboration?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(6).
    13. Umblijs, Janis & Hermansen, Are Skeie, 2025. "Can A New Name Open Closed Doors? Foreign-Sounding Names and Immigrant Earnings," SocArXiv rd3gv_v1, Center for Open Science.
    14. Jaworski, Krystian & Olipra, Jakub, 2025. "Cutting VAT rate on food products in a high-inflation environment. Does it work out?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    15. Yibo Li & Haonan Li, 2026. "The benefits share of digital infrastructure," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 1-45, January.
    16. Kim, Yoonjung, 2025. "The effects of universal free lunch provision on student achievement: Evidence from South Korea," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    17. Zhu, Junjie & Guo, Hongfeng, 2025. "Does the development of high-speed rail benefit carbon emissions reduction?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    18. Paul Bingley & Lorenzo Cappellari & Marco Ovidi, 2023. "When it hurts the most: timing of parental job loss and a child’s education," LISER Working Paper Series 2023-12, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    19. Shen, Zhenyu & Si, Ruichao & Xu, Gang, 2026. "Anti-corruption shocks, political incentives, and regional economic development in a developmental state," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    20. Acosta, Miguel & Mueller, Andreas I. & Nakamura, Emi & Steinsson, Jon, 2023. "Macroeconomic Effects of UI Extensions at Short and Long Durations," CEPR Discussion Papers 18534, Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.25438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.