IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2602.01963.html

Forecasting Oil Consumption: The Statistical Review of World Energy Meets Machine Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Ditzen
  • Erkal Ersoy
  • Haoyang Li
  • Francesco Ravazzolo

Abstract

This paper studies whether a small set of dominant countries can account for most of the dynamics of regional oil demand and improve forecasting performance. We focus on dominant drivers within the OECD and a broad GVAR sample covering over 90\% of world GDP. Our approach identifies dominant drivers from a high-dimensional concentration matrix estimated row by row using two complementary variable-selection methods, LASSO and the one-covariate-at-a-time multiple testing (OCMT) procedure. Dominant countries are selected by ordering the columns of the concentration matrix by their norms and applying a criterion based on consecutive norm ratios, combined with economically motivated restrictions to rule out pseudo-dominance. The United States emerges as a global dominant driver, while France and Japan act as robust regional hubs representing European and Asian components, respectively. Including these dominant drivers as regressors for all countries yields statistically significant forecast gains over autoregressive benchmarks and country-specific LASSO models, particularly during periods of heightened global volatility. The proposed framework is flexible and can be applied to other macroeconomic and energy variables with network structure or spatial dependence.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Ditzen & Erkal Ersoy & Haoyang Li & Francesco Ravazzolo, 2026. "Forecasting Oil Consumption: The Statistical Review of World Energy Meets Machine Learning," Papers 2602.01963, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.01963
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.01963
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Bo & Liu, Jiahao & Lin, Renda & Chevallier, Julien, 2021. "Cross-border systemic risk spillovers in the global oil system: Does the oil trade pattern matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Pesaran, M. Hashem & Smith, Ron P., 2024. "High-Dimensional Forecasting With Known Knowns And Known Unknowns," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 267, pages 1-25, February.
    3. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2006. "Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 967-1012, July.
    4. Jan Ditzen & Francesco Ravazzolo, 2022. "Dominant Drivers of National Inflation," Working Papers No 08/2022, Centre for Applied Macro- and Petroleum economics (CAMP), BI Norwegian Business School.
    5. Achim Ahrens & Christian B. Hansen & Mark E. Schaffer, 2020. "lassopack: Model selection and prediction with regularized regression in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 20(1), pages 176-235, March.
    6. Brownlees, Christian & Mesters, Geert, 2021. "Detecting granular time series in large panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 544-561.
    7. Victor Chernozhukov & Wolfgang Härdle & Chen Huang & Weining Wang, 2018. "LASSO-driven inference in time and space," CeMMAP working papers CWP36/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    8. Mohamad Husam Helmi & Abdurrahman Nazif Çatık & Çağla Bucak & Esra Ballı & Coşkun Akdeniz, 2024. "Time-Varying Income and Price Elasticities of Oil Demand in OECD Countries," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 303-311, November.
    9. Jianqing Fan & Yuan Liao & Han Liu, 2016. "An overview of the estimation of large covariance and precision matrices," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 19(1), pages 1-32, February.
    10. Pesaran, M. Hashem & Yang, Cynthia Fan, 2021. "Estimation and inference in spatial models with dominant units," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 591-615.
    11. Matteo Barigozzi & Haeran Cho & Dom Owens, 2024. "FNETS: Factor-Adjusted Network Estimation and Forecasting for High-Dimensional Time Series," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 890-902, July.
    12. Diebold, Francis X & Mariano, Roberto S, 2002. "Comparing Predictive Accuracy," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(1), pages 134-144, January.
    13. Alexander Chudik & M. Hashem Pesaran & Elisa Tosetti, 2011. "Weak and strong cross‐section dependence and estimation of large panels," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 14, pages 45-90, February.
    14. Alexandre Belloni & Victor Chernozhukov & Christian Hansen & Damian Kozbur, 2016. "Inference in High-Dimensional Panel Models With an Application to Gun Control," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 590-605, October.
    15. Gao, Jiti & Peng, Bin & Smyth, Russell, 2021. "On income and price elasticities for energy demand: A panel data study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    16. Kapetanios, G. & Pesaran, M.H. & Reese, S., 2021. "Detection of units with pervasive effects in large panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 510-541.
    17. Paramati, Sudharshan Reddy & Shahzad, Umer & Doğan, Buhari, 2022. "The role of environmental technology for energy demand and energy efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    18. Peter R. Hansen & Asger Lunde & James M. Nason, 2011. "The Model Confidence Set," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 453-497, March.
    19. Xavier Gabaix, 2011. "The Granular Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 733-772, May.
    20. Bo Zhu & Jiahao Liu & Renda Lin & Julien Chevallier, 2021. "Cross-border systemic risk spillovers in the global oil system: Does the oil trade pattern matter?," Post-Print halshs-04250280, HAL.
    21. Seung C. Ahn & Alex R. Horenstein, 2013. "Eigenvalue Ratio Test for the Number of Factors," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 1203-1227, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yigit Aydede & Jan Ditzen, 2022. "Identifying the regional drivers of influenza-like illness in Nova Scotia with dominance analysis," Papers 2212.06684, arXiv.org.
    2. Bailey, N. & Ditzen, J. & Holly, S., 2025. "My neighbour's neighbour is not my neighbour: Instrumentation and causality in spatial models," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2501, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    3. Chuliá, Helena & Garrón, Ignacio & Uribe, Jorge M., 2024. "Daily growth at risk: Financial or real drivers? The answer is not always the same," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 762-776.
    4. Liddle, Brantley & Parker, Steven, 2022. "One more for the road: Reconsidering whether OECD gasoline income and price elasticities have changed over time," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    5. Hansen, Christian & Liao, Yuan, 2019. "The Factor-Lasso And K-Step Bootstrap Approach For Inference In High-Dimensional Economic Applications," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(3), pages 465-509, June.
    6. Hyungsik Roger Moon & Martin Weidner, 2015. "Linear Regression for Panel With Unknown Number of Factors as Interactive Fixed Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83(4), pages 1543-1579, July.
    7. repec:cam:camjip:2429 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Mundt, Philipp & Alfarano, Simone & Milaković, Mishael, 2020. "Exploiting ergodicity in forecasts of corporate profitability," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    9. Vasilis Sarafidis & Tom Wansbeek, 2012. "Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel Data Analysis," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 483-531, September.
    10. Hyungsik Roger Roger Moon & Martin Weidner, 2014. "Linear regression for panel with unknown number of factors as interactive fixed effects," CeMMAP working papers 35/14, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    11. Simon Freyaldenhoven, 2017. "A Generalized Factor Model with Local Factors," 2017 Papers pfr361, Job Market Papers.
    12. Sebastian Kripfganz & Vasilis Sarafidis, 2026. "Chasing Opportunity: Spillovers and Drivers of U.S. State Population Growth," Papers 2601.10444, arXiv.org.
    13. Yoshimasa Uematsu & Takashi Yamagata, 2019. "Estimation of Weak Factor Models," ISER Discussion Paper 1053r, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka, revised Mar 2020.
    14. Ge, Shuyi & Li, Shaoran & Linton, Oliver, 2023. "News-implied linkages and local dependency in the equity market," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 779-815.
    15. Alexander Chudik & M. Hashem Pesaran, 2013. "Large panel data models with cross-sectional dependence: a survey," Globalization Institute Working Papers 153, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.
    16. Brownlees, Christian & Mesters, Geert, 2021. "Detecting granular time series in large panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 544-561.
    17. Natalia Bailey & George Kapetanios & M. Hashem Pesaran, 2016. "Exponent of Cross‐Sectional Dependence: Estimation and Inference," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 929-960, September.
    18. Jörg Breitung & Philipp Hansen, 2021. "Correction to: Alternative estimation approaches for the factor augmented panel data model with small T," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 3557-3558, December.
    19. Ergemen, Yunus Emre, 2023. "Parametric estimation of long memory in factor models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1483-1499.
    20. Wei Shi & Lung-fei Lee, 2018. "The effects of gun control on crimes: a spatial interactive fixed effects approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 233-263, August.
    21. Freyaldenhoven, Simon, 2022. "Factor models with local factors — Determining the number of relevant factors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 80-102.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.01963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.