IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2510.23669.html

What Work is AI Actually Doing? Uncovering the Drivers of Generative AI Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Peeyush Agarwal
  • Harsh Agarwal
  • Akshat Rana

Abstract

Purpose: The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) systems like ChatGPT, Claude AI, etc., has a deep impact on how work is done. Predicting how AI will reshape work requires understanding not just its capabilities, but how it is actually being adopted. This study investigates which intrinsic task characteristics drive users' decisions to delegate work to AI systems. Methodology: This study utilizes the Anthropic Economic Index dataset of four million Claude AI interactions mapped to O*NET tasks. We systematically scored each task across seven key dimensions: Routine, Cognitive, Social Intelligence, Creativity, Domain Knowledge, Complexity, and Decision Making using 35 parameters. We then employed multivariate techniques to identify latent task archetypes and analyzed their relationship with AI usage. Findings: Tasks requiring high creativity, complexity, and cognitive demand, but low routineness, attracted the most AI engagement. Furthermore, we identified three task archetypes: Dynamic Problem Solving, Procedural & Analytical Work, and Standardized Operational Tasks, demonstrating that AI applicability is best predicted by a combination of task characteristics, over individual factors. Our analysis revealed highly concentrated AI usage patterns, with just 5% of tasks accounting for 59% of all interactions. Originality: This research provides the first systematic evidence linking real-world generative AI usage to a comprehensive, multi-dimensional framework of intrinsic task characteristics. It introduces a data-driven classification of work archetypes that offers a new framework for analyzing the emerging human-AI division of labor.

Suggested Citation

  • Peeyush Agarwal & Harsh Agarwal & Akshat Rana, 2025. "What Work is AI Actually Doing? Uncovering the Drivers of Generative AI Adoption," Papers 2510.23669, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.23669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.23669
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Trammell & Anton Korinek, 2023. "Economic Growth under Transformative AI," NBER Working Papers 31815, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Ed Felten & Manav Raj & Robert Seamans, 2023. "How will Language Modelers like ChatGPT Affect Occupations and Industries?," Papers 2303.01157, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    3. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2019. "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 3-30, Spring.
    4. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Nov.
    5. Erik Brynjolfsson & Danielle Li & Lindsey Raymond, 2025. "Generative AI at Work," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(2), pages 889-942.
    6. Bonney, Kathryn & Breaux, Cory & Buffington, Catherine & Dinlersoz, Emin & Foster, Lucia & Goldschlag, Nathan & Haltiwanger, John & Kroff, Zachary & Savage, Keith, 2024. "The impact of AI on the workforce: Tasks versus jobs?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    7. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin & David J. Deming, 2026. "The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(10), pages 8440-8456, October.
    8. David Card & John E. DiNardo, 2002. "Skill-Biased Technological Change and Rising Wage Inequality: Some Problems and Puzzles," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(4), pages 733-783, October.
    9. Edward Felten & Manav Raj & Robert Seamans, 2021. "Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(12), pages 2195-2217, December.
    10. James Bessen, 2019. "Automation and jobs: when technology boosts employment," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 34(100), pages 589-626.
    11. David H. Autor, 2015. "Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(3), pages 3-30, Summer.
    12. Pelin Ozgul & Marie-Christine Fregin & Michael Stops & Simon Janssen & Mark Levels, 2024. "High-skilled Human Workers in Non-Routine Jobs are Susceptible to AI Automation but Wage Benefits Differ between Occupations," Papers 2404.06472, arXiv.org.
    13. Emilio Colombo & Fabio Mercorio & Mario Mezzanzanica & Antonio Serino, 2024. "Towards the Terminator Economy: Assessing Job Exposure to AI through LLMs," DISEIS - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo dis2401, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo (DISEIS).
    14. Acemoglu, Daron & Autor, David, 2011. "Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings," Handbook of Labor Economics, in: O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (ed.), Handbook of Labor Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 12, pages 1043-1171, Elsevier.
    15. Riikka M. Sarala & Corinne Post & Jonathan Doh & Daniel Muzio, 2025. "Advancing Research on the Future of Work in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (AI)," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 1863-1884, July.
    16. David J. Deming, 2017. "The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(4), pages 1593-1640.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soohyoung Lee & Dawoon Jeong & Jeong-Dong Lee, 2026. "Contrasting pathways of automation: routine task substitution vs. AI complementarity," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Prashant Garg & Tommaso Crosta & Jasmin Baier, 2026. "Global Automation Atlas," Papers 2605.17086, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2026.
    3. repec:ces:ceswps:_12072 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Caselli, Mauro & Fracasso, Andrea & Scicchitano, Sergio & Traverso, Silvio & Tundis, Enrico, 2025. "What workers and robots do: An activity-based analysis of the impact of robotization on changes in local employment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    5. Kiran Tomlinson & Sonia Jaffe & Will Wang & Scott Counts & Siddharth Suri, 2025. "Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations," Papers 2507.07935, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2026.
    6. Du, Junhong & He, Jiajia & Yang, Jing & Chen, Xiaohong, 2024. "How industrial robots affect labor income share in task model: Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    7. Jensen, Mathias Fjællegaard & Schneider, Cédric, 2026. "Digital skill adoption and employment dynamics: Evidence from matched vacancy-employer–employee data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    8. Venkat Ram Reddy Ganuthula & Krishna Kumar Balaraman, 2025. "The Paradox of Professional Input: How Expert Collaboration with AI Systems Shapes Their Future Value," Papers 2504.12654, arXiv.org.
    9. Al khatib, Abdullah Mohammad Ghazi & Alshaib, Bayan Mohamad, 2026. "The heterogeneous effects of artificial intelligence on labor markets: A calibrated simulation of skills, tasks, and wages," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. Graetz, Georg, 2020. "Technological change and the Swedish labor market," Working Paper Series 2020:19, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    11. Fangyan Wang & Zaiyan Wei & Yang Wang, 2026. "Generative AI and the Reorganization of Labor Demand," Papers 2605.23159, arXiv.org.
    12. Ma, Bianjing & Chen, Lei & Wang, Xiaohui & Ding, Song, 2024. "Who benefits more from the digital economy: (Non-)Cognitive ability and the labor income premium," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    13. Egana-delSol, Pablo & Bravo-Ortega, Claudio, 2026. "Artificial intelligence exposure and labor market transformations in Latin America," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. Stephany, Fabian & Teutloff, Ole, 2024. "What is the price of a skill? The value of complementarity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    15. Anastasiia Pustovalova & Priit Vahter, 2024. "Automation-Skill Complementarity: The Changing Returns To Soft Skills In Different Stages Of Technology Adoption," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 146, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    16. Katz, Raúl & Jung, Juan, 2026. "The Macroeconomic effects of generative AI," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 400-411.
    17. Egana-delSol, Pablo & Bravo-Ortega, Claudio, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence and Labor Market Transformations in Latin America," IZA Discussion Papers 17746, IZA Network @ LISER.
    18. Benjamin Meindl & Morgan R. Frank & Joana Mendonc{c}a, 2021. "Exposure of occupations to technologies of the fourth industrial revolution," Papers 2110.13317, arXiv.org.
    19. Stefan Jestl, 2022. "Industrial Robots, and Information and Communication Technology: The Employment Effects in EU Labour Markets," wiiw Working Papers 215, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    20. Xiliu He & Haoxiang Zhao & Mingyi Ma & Edward Wen Chuan Lai & Koei Enomoto & Anni Hu & Jiatong Li & Lingyun Chu & Yuan Lai, 2026. "Generative AI impacts on intra-urban inequality and skill premium in Beijing," Papers 2605.25505, arXiv.org.
    21. Bhalotra, Sonia & Fernandez, Manuel & Wang, Fan, 2022. "The Distribution of the Gender Wage Gap: An Equilibrium Model," CEPR Discussion Papers 17253, Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.23669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.